on ferrocene derivatives.8 However, the full potential of
substituted [2.2]paracyclophanes for asymmetric synthesis has
only been realized since ca. the 1990s.9,10 These compounds
are not only highly rigid, but also stable during exposure to
high temperatures (up to 200 °C), light, acids, and bases.9,11
PhanePHOS achieved higher activity and enantioselectivity than
BINAP in the preparation of the HIV protease inhibitor
Crixivan.12 N,O-ligands derived from FHPC, AHPC, and BHPC
have also been successfully applied to the addition of organozinc
reagents to aldehydes and imines.13 Compared to these suc-
cessful analogues, P,N-[2.2]paracyclophane ligands are still at
an early stage. Pseudo-gem-phosphinyl-oxazolinyl[2.2]para-
cyclophane14 was the first to be reported, and the pseudo-ortho-
and ortho-counterparts15 were subsequently prepared. All of
these ligands were employed in the Pd-catalyzed allylic
substitution of 1,3-diphenyl-2-propenyl acetate with dimethyl
malonate and exhibited widely differing activities and enanti-
oselectivities, among which the pseudo-ortho-ligand gave the
best result.
[2.2]Paracyclophane-Derived Chiral P,N-Ligands:
Design, Synthesis, and Application in
Palladium-Catalyzed Asymmetric Allylic
Alkylation
Biao Jiang,* Yang Lei, and Xiao-Long Zhao
Laboratory of Modern Synthetic Organic Chemistry,
Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy
of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, People’s Republic of China
ReceiVed June 30, 2008
We reasoned that if the structural rigidity and flexibility could
be further regulated,16 the performance of the ligands might be
improved. Thus P,N-[2.2]paracyclophane ligands 1-6, which
use the pyridine or quinoline nitrogen as a donor atom, were
(4) (a) Matt, P. v.; Pfaltz, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1993, 32, 566–568. (b)
Matt, P. v.; Loiseleur, O.; Koch, G.; Pfaltz, A.; Lefeber, C.; Feucht, T.; Helmchen,
G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5, 573–584. (c) Matt, P. V.; Lloyd-Jones,
G. C.; Minidis, A. B. E.; Pfaltz, A.; Macko, L.; Neuburger, M.; Zehnder, M.;
Ru¨egger, H.; Pregosin, P. S. HelV. Chim. Acta 1995, 78, 265–284. (d) Sprinz,
J.; Helmchen, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 1769–1772. (e) Sprinz, J.; Kiefer,
M.; Helmchen, G.; Reggelin, M.; Huttner, G.; Walter, O.; Zsolnai, L. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1994, 35, 1523–1526.
(5) For examples, see: (a) Mino, T.; Saito, A.; Tanaka, Y.; Hasegawa, S.;
Sato, Y.; Sakamoto, M.; Fujita, T. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 1937–1940. (b) Mino,
T.; Sato, Y.; Saito, A.; Tanaka, Y.; Saotome, H.; Sakamoto, M.; Fujita, T. J.
Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 7979–7984. (c) Jiang, B.; Huang, Z.-G.; Cheng, K.-J.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2006, 17, 942–951.
With the idea of tuning structural flexibility and rigidity,
several [2.2]paracyclophane-derived P,N-ligands were de-
signed and synthesized. A full investigation of the relation-
ship between the ligands’ structures and their abilities to
induce asymmetry in palladium-catalyzed asymmetric allylic
alkylations of malonates with 1,3-diphenyl 2-propenyl acetate
was carried out, and high yields and enantioselectivities (i.e.,
99% yield, 97% ee) were observed while using ligands
bearing matched planar and central chirality.
(6) For examples, see: (a) Bourghida, M.; Widhalm, M. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1998, 9, 1073–1083. (b) Imai, Y.; Zhang, W.; Kida, T.; Nakatsuji,
Y.; Ikeda, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 4343–4346. (c) Stranne, R.; Vasse,
J. L.; Moberg, C. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2525–2528.
(7) Doucet, H.; Brown, J. M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 3775–3784.
(8) For reviews, see: (a) Togni, A. In Metallocenes; Togni, A., Halterman,
R. L., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1998; pp 685-721. (b) Atkinson, R. C. J.; Gibson,
V. C.; Long, N. J. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2004, 33, 313–328. (c) Colacot, T. J. Chem.
ReV. 2003, 103, 3101–3118.
(9) For reviews, see: (a) Gibson, S. E.; Knight, J. D. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2003, 1, 1256–1269. (b) Rozenberg, V.; Sergeeva, E.; Hopf, H. In Modern
Cyclophane Chemistry; Gleiter, R., Hopf, H., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
Germany, 2004; pp 435-462.
(10) Examples of chiral [2.2]paracyclophane structrues: (a) Rowlands, G. J.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 1527-1534. (b) Vorontsova, N. V.; Rozenberg,
V. I.; Sergeeva, E. V.; Vorontsov, E. V.; Starikova, Z. A.; Lyssenko, K. A.;
Hopf, H. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 4600–4617.
(11) Reich, H. J.; Cram, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 3505–3516.
(12) Pye, P. J.; Rossen, K.; Reamer, R. A.; Tsou, N. N.; Volante, R. P.;
Reider, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6207–6208.
Palladium-catalyzed asymmetric allylic alkylation has proven
to be a powerful tool for stereoselective C-C bond-formation.1
Among many chiral ligands designed for this reaction, chiral
P,N-ligands have played an important role owing to their steric
and electronic asymmetry.2,3
Extensive research has been conducted on centrally and
axially chiral P,N-ligands, of which representative examples are
the PHOX ligands,2,4 prolinol derived ligands,5 binaphthyl-based
ligands,6 and the QUINAP-type ligand.7 Most investigations
dealing with ligands possessing planar chirality have focused
(1) For reviews, see: (a) Pfaltz, A.; Lautens, M. In ComprehensiVe Asymmetric
Catalysis; Jacobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A., Yamamoto, H., Eds.; Springer-Verlag:
Berlin, Germany, 1999; Vol. 2. (b) Trost, B. M.; Lee, C. In Catalytic Asymmetric
Synthesis; Ojima, I., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 2000; pp 593-649. (c)
Nishibayashi, Y.; Uemura, S. In ComprehensiVe Organometallic Chemistry;
Mingos, D. M. P., Crabtree, R. H., Eds.; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The
Netherlands, 2003; Vol. 11, pp 75-122. (d) Tsuji, J. In Palladium Reagents
and Catalysts; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2004. (e) Zhan Lu, S. M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 258–297.
(2) Helmchen, G.; Pfaltz, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 336–345.
(3) (a) Guiry, P. J.; Saunders, C. P. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 497–537.
(b) Pfaltz, A.; Drury, W. J., III. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 5723–
5726. (c) Togni, A.; Burckhardt, U.; Gramlich, V.; Pregosin, P. S.; Salzmann,
R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1031–1037.
(13) (a) Dahmen, S. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2113–2116. (b) Dahmen, S.; Bra¨se,
S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 2845–2850. (c) Dahmen, S.; Bra¨se, S.
Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 4119–4122. (d) Dahmen, S.; Bra¨se, S. Chem. Commun. 2002,
26–27. (e) Dahmen, S.; Bra¨se, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5940–5941. (f)
Danilova, T. I.; Rozenberg, V. I.; Sergeeva, E. V.; Starikova, Z. A.; Bra¨se, S.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 2013–2019. (g) Danilova, T. I.; Rozenberg,
V. I.; Starikova, Z. A.; Bra¨se, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15, 223–229.
(h) Hermanns, N.; Dahmen, S.; Bolm, C.; Bra¨se, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 3692–3694. (i) Rozenberg, V. I.; Danilova, T. I.; Sergeeva, E. V.;
Shouklov, I. A.; Starikova, Z. A.; Hopf, H.; Ku¨hlein, K. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 432–440.
(14) Wu, X.-W.; Yuan, K.; Sun, W.; Zhang, M.-J.; Hou, X.-L. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2003, 14, 107–112.
(15) Whelligan, D. K.; Bolm, C. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 4609–4618.
10.1021/jo801373r CCC: $40.75
Published on Web 08/23/2008
2008 American Chemical Society
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 7833–7836 7833