954
D. Gerlach, J. Wagler / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 10 (2007) 952–955
solution, however, may arise from through-bond substitu-
ent effects and does not necessarily indicate any hypercoor-
dination of the Si-atom of 2 in solution.
benzene to act as a bidentate ligand by formation of
six-membered chelates, a chelating pattern typical for Schiff
base ligands. In silicon complexes, however, this ligand
system exhibits noticeable differences and gives rise to com-
pounds with capped-tetrahedral coordination spheres
under formation of five-membered pseudo-chelates.
As known from studies of Kano et al. [4], phenyldiazo-
benzene ligands can undergo cis–trans-isomerization upon
UV-irradiation. Irradiation of 2 with UV revealed that
the phenyldiazophenolate ligand is also susceptible to
photo-induced isomerization [10]. However, due to the
presence of four phenyldiazophenolate ligands a mixture
of various compounds has been detected by 29Si NMR
spectroscopy after irradiation.
As the hypercoordinate Si-compounds of Kano et al. [4]
bear Si-bound fluorine atoms as electron withdrawing
substituents, we examined the effect of Si-bound fluorine
atoms on our ligand system by partial replacement of dia-
zophenolate ligands by F-atoms to yield 3 (Scheme 3). So
far, we have not been able to isolate compound 3 as a solid,
but its 29Si NMR data in solution (d À110.2, triplet,
1JSi–F = 174.1 Hz) indicates both the successful twofold
fluorination and the presence of a still four-coordinate,
potentially [4+2]-coordinate, Si nucleus.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
CCDC 641409, 641407 and 641408 contain the supple-
mentary crystallographic data for 1, 2 and 4. These data
lographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2
1EZ, UK; fax: (+44) 1223-336-033; or e-mail: deposit@
ccdc.cam.ac.uk. Supplementary data associated with this
article can be found, in the online version, at
References
[1] D. Kost, I. Kalikhman, Adv. Organomet. Chem. 50 (2004) 1;
J. Yang, J.G. Verkade, J. Organomet. Chem. 651 (2002) 15;
J. Wagler, M. Schley, D. Gerlach, U. Bo¨hme, E. Brendler, G. Roewer,
Z. Naturforsch. B 60 (2005) 1054;
J. Wagler, D. Gerlach, G. Roewer, Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 474
(2006) 1826.
[2] M. Schley, J. Wagler, G. Roewer, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 631 (2005)
2914;
The byproduct of this transformation, boron complex 4,
crystallized from the reaction mixture. This compound has
already been described by Hohaus and Wessendorf [11].
However, a CSD search indicated that there are currently
no structural data for BF2-complexes with 2-phenyldiazo-
phenolate ligands available. Therefore, the structure of 4
is briefly described here (Fig. 3).
J. Wagler, U. Bo¨hme, E. Brendler, G. Roewer, Organometallics 24
(2005) 1348;
O. Seiler, C. Burschka, M. Fischer, M. Penka, R. Tacke, Inorg.
Chem. 44 (2005) 2337.
The two crystallographically independent molecules of 4
have similar conformations, therefore only one is discussed
here. As a result of the coordination of the B-atom, the
bond N1@N2 is significantly stretched with respect to the
corresponding bond length in compound 1. The boron
[3] K. Maeda, Y. Nakamura, N. Suzuki, Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho
(2002), JP 2002088664 A 20020327;
K. Maeda, Y. Nakamura, N. Suzuki, Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho
(2001), JP 2001316600 A 20011116;
˚
atom is located 0.387(3) A out-of-plane from the least-
squares-plane (O1, C1, C6, N1, N2). In contrast to 1, there
is a notable tilt of the phenyl group at N2 out of the plane
of the chelate in 4 (torsion N1–N2–C8–C9: 25.9(3)°).
The structures of the free ligand acid 1 and the boron
complex 4 demonstrate the ability of 2-oxy-5-methylazo-
S. Yamanaka, S. Sugawara, Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho (1991), JP
03149568 A 19910626;
M.A. Pujar, K. Sidappa, Nat. Acad. Sci. Lett. (India) 18 (1995) 99;
S.N. Chavan, V.E. Inamdar, S.V. Sunthankar, Ind. J. Chem. 13
(1975) 808.
[4] N. Kano, F. Komatsu, M. Yamamura, T. Kawashima, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 128 (2006) 7097;
M. Yamamura, N. Kano, T. Kawashima, J. Organomet. Chem. 692
(2007) 313.
C10
[5] Ligand 1 has been prepared according to a general literature method
(e.g., J. Song, C. Guo, L. Zhu, Z. Sun, Huaxue Shiji, 26 (2004) 89.)
from a solution of p-cresol and Na2CO3 and a solution of aniline,
HCl and NaNO2. The product has been recrystallized from ethanol.
Preparations of 2, 3 and 4 have been carried out under an atmosphere
of dry argon in dry solvents. Compound 2: A solution of 1 (5.00 g,
23.6 mmol) in 25 ml THF was added dropwise to a À78 °C cold
solution of SiCl4 (1.00 g, 5.90 mmol) and Et3N (2.86 g, 28.3 mmol) in
5 ml THF, then stirred at room temperature. The hydrochloride
precipitate was filtered after 1 d and washed with 25 ml THF. The
solvent was removed from the filtrate under vacuum and the red solid
was recrystallized from toluene (5 ml). Red crystals of 2 were filtered
off, washed with toluene : hexane (1:1) and dried in vacuum. Yield:
3.90 g (4.47 mmol, 76%). Mp: 125 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz):
C9
C8
C11
C12
C7
C5
C4
N1
C6
N2
C3
C13
B1
C1
C2
O1
F2
F1
Fig. 3. Molecular structure of one of the two crystallographically
independent molecules of 4 in the crystal (ORTEP plot with 50%
probability displacement ellipsoids, hydrogen atoms omitted). Selected
3
d = 2.22 (s, 12H, CH3), 6.89 (d, 4H, ar, JHH = 8.2 Hz), 7,10 (d, 4H,
3
ar, JHH = 8.2 Hz), 7.25–7.32 (m, 12H, ar), 7.42 (s, 4H, ar), 7.76 (d,
3
8H, ar, JHH = 7.2 Hz). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 101 MHz): d = 20.6
˚
bond lengths [A]: B1–O1 1.449(3), B1–N2 1.616(3), B1–F1 1.373(3), B1–
(CH3), 116.3, 121.4, 123.2, 128.5, 130.3, 132.1, 132.9, 142.3, 149.8,
F2 1.372(3), N1–N2 1.281(3), C1–O1 1.334(3).