Communications
Organometallics, Vol. 27, No. 19, 2008 4823
Ethylene polymerization results for 3, 4a, and 4b at 25 °C
and 60-300 psi of ethylene pressure are summarized in Table
1. Comparison of entry 1 versus 2 and entry 4 versus 5 shows
that 4a is ca. 4 times more active and produces polymers with
slightly higher Mn compared to 3. Both 3 and 4a produce
polyethylenes with ca. 10 methyl branches per 1000 carbon
atoms, which corresponds to 0.5-1 Me branch/chain. Longer
branches were not observed by 13C NMR.25 The polymers
produced by 3 and 4a contain terminal and internal olefin units,
1
with the terminal/internal ratio being higher for 3 than 4a. H
and 13C NMR analysis of polymers produced by 3 shows that
the internal olefins are mainly 2-olefins (85%), with small
amounts of 2+-olefins (15%), and that the E/Z ratio is ca. 1/1.16b
For the polymers produced by 4a, 67% of the internal olefins
are 2-olefins (E/Z ) 1/1). Increasing the ethylene pressure from
60 to 300 psi results in a higher yield and Mn for 3 but has
little influence on the performance of 4a (entries 7 and 8). The
polymer microstructures are not influenced by the pressure in
either case. The ethylene polymerization behavior of 4a is very
similar to that of (2-PAr2-benzenesulfonate)Ni(Ph)(PPh3) com-
plexes in the presence of phosphine scavengers.12
Comparison of entry 2 versus 3 and entry 5 versus 6 shows
that 4b is ca. 10 times less active but produces polymer with
higher Mn compared to 4a. The polymer produced by 4b is
highly linear (1 Me branch/1000 C) with a high level (91%) of
terminal unsaturation. The small fraction of internal olefins
contains only 2-olefins.
NMR monitoring of the reaction of 4a with ethylene (30
equiv) at 25 °C shows that ethylene is immediately and rapidly
polymerized but that a minimal amount of 4a is consumed,
showing that the initial insertion is slower than subsequent
insertions. For all three catalysts, polymer yields increase by
only a factor of 2-3 when the polymerization time is extended
from 2 to 18 h (entries 1-3 vs 4-6), indicating that significant
catalyst deactivation occurs under these conditions.
These results are consistent with the mechanism in Scheme
3, which is analogous to that established for related (phosphi-
nosulfonamide)nickel catalysts.26 The lack of a pressure de-
pendence of the polymer yield, Mn, and microstructure for 4a
suggests that the catalyst resting state is the alkyl olefin adduct
II and that chain transfer occurs by ꢀ-H transfer to metal
followed by associative olefin exchange of III or ꢀ-H transfer
to monomer and olefin exchange of IV. 2,1-Insertion of III
would generate secondary alkyl species V, which can insert
ethylene to form Me branches, undergo chain transfer to form
internal olefins, or undergo further chain walking, leading to
2+-olefins.
Figure 2. Molecular structure of 4b. Hydrogen atoms are omitted.
Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (deg): Ni(1)-P(1) 2.149(1),
Ni(1)-O(1) 1.922(3), Ni(1)-C(1) 1.919(4), Ni(1)-C(2) 2.023(4),
Ni(1)-C(3) 2.260(4), S(1)-O(1) 1.477(3), S(1)-O(2) 1.442(3),
S(1)-O(3) 1.442(3); O(1)-Ni(1)-P(1) 98.10 (8), P(1)-Ni(1)-C(1)
98.9 (1), O(1)-Ni(1)-C(3) 96.1(1), C(1)-Ni(1)-C(3) 69.8(2).
The methoxy group of the axial 2-OMe-Ph ring [O(5)] sits above
an axial coordination site, but the NisO distance (Ni(1)-O(5),
3.25 Å) is too long for a significant Ni-O interaction.20 The
benzyl group is coordinated in a η3 fashion with the methylene
group cis to the phosphine. The Ni-Cmethylene distance is ca.
0.24 Å shorter than the Ni-Cortho distance, as expected based
on the greater trans influence of the phosphine compared to the
sulfonate ligand and the greater negative charge on the meth-
ylene carbon compared to the o-carbon of the benzyl anion.21
Similar features were observed for other η3-benzyl nickel
complexes.18a,22 The structure of 4b is similar to that of 4a
except that the [PO]Ni chelate ring in 4b adopts an envelope
conformation, with O(1) lying 0.81 Å out of the Ni(1)-P(1)-
C(13)-C(8)-S(1) plane.
The NMR spectra of 4a and 4b show that the η3-benzyl
structures are retained in solution. The 13C NMR -CH2Ph
resonances (4a, δ 25.8, JCP ) 8 Hz; 4b, δ 18.1, JCP ) 9 Hz)
are typical for η3-benzyl nickel complexes (δ 15-35) and are
downfield from the position expected for η1-benzyl nickel
1
complexes (ca. δ 10).18,22,23 Additionally, the JCH value (157
Hz) for the -CH2Ph groups of 4a and 4b is indicative of η3
coordination. The ambient temperature 13C NMR spectra contain
one set of 2-OMe-Ph resonances for 4a and one set of Cy
resonances for 4b, indicative of fast inversion of the [PO]Ni
1
rings. Also, the ambient temperature H NMR spectra of both
complexes contain one doublet for the -CH2Ph hydrogens (4a,
JHP ) 5.0 Hz; 4b, JHP ) 3.5 Hz) and one set of -CH2Ph
resonances, which shows that in both cases the edges of the
benzyl ligand are equivalent on the NMR time scale. These
observations can be accounted for by fast η3/η1-benzyl isomer-
ization or fast suprafacial shifting of the [PO]Ni unit across the
η3-benzyl ligand.22c,23,24
(25) Galland, G. B.; de Souza, R. F.; Mauler, R. S.; Nunes, F. F.
Macromolecules 1999, 32, 1620.
(26) Rachita, M. J.; Huff, R. L.; Bennett, J. L.; Brookhart, M. J. Polym.
Sci., Part A 2000, 38, 4627.
(27) PPh3 might also induce chain transfer by the formation of
[PO]Ni(R)(ethylene)(PPh3) species as suggested in refs 14d and 14i.
(28) Two isomers and two modes of insertion are possible for [PO]Ni(R)-
(ethylene) species II in Scheme 3. As a result of trans-influence effects,
the cis-P,R-II isomer shown in Scheme 3 is probably more stable than trans-
P,R-II, in which the alkyl is trans to the PR2 unit, but the ethylene insertion
barrier is probably higher for cis-P,R-II than for trans-P,R-II. A similar
situation arises in other unsymmetrical catalysts. It has been proposed that
in such systems chain growth proceeds by isomerization of the more stable
(LL′)M(R)(olefin) isomer to the less stable isomer, followed by migratory
insertion. Thus, chain growth in Scheme 3 may occur by isomerization of
cis-P,R-II to trans-P,R-II followed by insertion to form I; however, further
studies are required to fully understand the chain growth mechanism in
this system. For discussions of this issue, see refs 13 and 14d and (a) Jenkins,
J. C.; Brookhart, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5827. (b) Haras, A.;
Anderson, G. D. W.; Michalak, A.; Rieger, B.; Ziegler, T. Organometallics
2006, 25, 4491. (c) Michalak, A.; Ziegler, T. Organometallics 2003, 22,
2069. (d) Chan, M. S. W.; Deng, L.; Ziegler, T. Organometallics 2000, 19,
2741.
(20) Σ(Ni and O covalent radii) ) 1.94 Å; Σ(Ni and O van der Waals
belements.com/.
(21) Bushby, R. J.; Tytko, M. P. J. Organomet. Chem. 1984, 270, 265.
(22) (a) Lee, B. Y.; Bazan, G. C.; Vela, J.; Komon, Z. J. A.; Bu, X.
´
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5352. (b) Albers, I.; Alvarez, E.; Ca´mpora,
J.; Maya, C. M.; Palma, P.; Sa´nchez, L. J.; Passaglia, E. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2004, 689, 833. (c) Ascenso, J. R.; Carrondo, M. A.; Dias, A. R.;
Gomes, P. T.; Piedade, M. F. M.; Roma˜o, C. C. Polyhedron 1989, 8, 2449.
(23) (a) Shim, C. B.; Kim, Y. H.; Lee, B. Y.; Dong, Y.; Yun, H.
Organometallics 2003, 22, 4272. (b) S, S.; Joe, D. J.; Na, S. J.; Park, Y.;
Choi, C. H.; Lee, B. Y. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 10027.
(24) (a) Carmona, E.; Paneque, M.; Poveda, M. L. Polyhedron 1989, 8,
285. (b) Becker, Y.; Stille, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 845. (c)
Cotton, F. A.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 1339.