P. Furet et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 897–900
899
Table 1. IC50 values (lM) of compound 1 in enzymatic assays and
nature of gate keeper residue
possessing a bulky gate keeper residue is inhibited by 1
at a concentration as high as 10 lM. This is the case
for the FLT3, JAK2, and c-Met kinases, for instance,
which present a phenylalanine, a methionine, and a leu-
cine, respectively, at the gate keeper position. In con-
trast, all the kinases tested having a threonine or a
residue of similar size (valine or isoleucine) at this posi-
tion are inhibited by 1 in the micromolar or submicrom-
olar range.
a
Kinase
IC50
Gate keeper
c-Src
EGF-R
c-Abl
0.066
0.38
0.25
0.57
0.93
0.96
0.30
1.4
Thr
Thr
Thr
Val
Thr
Val
Ile
FGFR-1
c-Kit
KDR
Tie-2
PDGFR-b
B-raf V599E
EphB4
P38
Thr
Thr
Thr
Thr
Phe
Leu
Met
Met
Phe
Met
Met
Leu
In conclusion, the results presented here give an addi-
tional illustration that employing a pseudo ring resulting
from the formation of an intramolecular hydrogen bond
is a valuable novel approach for mimicking a real ring in
a lead compound. Prototype 1 has given us an entry in a
new class of protein kinase inhibitors of potential inter-
est for a variety of therapeutic targets.14–16
0.15
0.43
0.35
>10
>10
>10
>10
>10
>10
>10
>10
FLT3
c-Met
IGF1-R
JAK2
CDK2
PKA
PKB
Axl
Acknowledgment
a All IC50 values represent averages of at least three experimental
determinations.
We thank K. Ucci-Stoll for her technical assistance.
References and notes
1. Bilton, C.; Allen, F. H.; Shields, G. P.; Howard, J. A. K.
Acta Crystallogr. B 2000, B56, 849.
2. Furet, P.; Bold, G.; Hofmann, F.; Manley, P.; Meyer, T.;
Altmann, K. H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 2967.
´
3. Liechti, C.; Sequin, U.; Bold, G.; Furet, P.; Meyer, T.;
Traxler, P. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 39, 11.
4. Klutchko, S. R.; Hamby, J. M.; Boschelli, D. H.; Wu, Z.;
Kraker, A. J.; Amar, A. M.; Hartl, B. G.; Shen, C.; Klohs,
W. D.; Steinkampf, R. W.; Driscoll, D. L.; Nelson, J. M.;
Elliott, W. L.; Roberts, B. J.; Stoner, C. L.; Vincent, P.
W.; Dykes, D. J.; Panek, R. L.; Lu, G. H.; Major, T. C.;
Dahring, T. K.; Hallak, H.; Bradford, L. A.; Showalter,
H. D. H.; Doherty, A. M. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3276.
5. VanderWel, S. N.; Harvey, P. J.; McNamara, D. J.;
Repine, J. T.; Keller, P. R.; Quin, J., 3rd; Booth, R. J.;
Elliott, W. L.; Dobrusin, E. M.; Fry, D. W.; Toogood, P.
L. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 2371.
6. Panek, R. L.; Lu, G. H.; Klutchko, S. R.; Batley, B. L.;
Dahring, T. K.; Hamby, J. M.; Hallak, H.; Doherty, A.
M.; Keiser, J. A. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1997, 283, 1433.
7. For recent examples, see (a) Cao, J.; Fine, R.; Gritzen, C.;
Hood, J.; Kang, X.; Klebansky, B.; Lohse, D.; Mak, C.
C.; McPherson, A.; Noronha, G.; Palanki, M. S. S.;
Pathak, V. P.; Renick, J.; Soll, R.; Zeng, B.; Zhu, H.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 5812; (b) McDermott,
L. A.; Simcox, M.; Higgins, B.; Nevins, T.; Kolinsky, K.;
Smith, M.; Yang, H.; Li, J. K.; Chen, Y.; Ke, J.; Mallalieu,
N.; Egan, T.; Kolis, S.; Railkar, A.; Gerber, L.; Luk, K.-
C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 13, 4835; (c) Sabat, M.;
VanRens, J. C.; Brugel, T. A.; Maier, J.; Laufersweiler, M.
J.; Golebiowski, A.; De, B.; Easwaran, V.; Hsieh, L. C.;
Rosegen, J.; Berberich, S.; Suchanek, E.; Janusz, M. J.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 4257.
8. These structures have the following entry codes in the
Cambridge Structural Database: BPCTHA, CNBPCT,
KPRCGM20, PCMTRE10, PCTRIB10, PUCGLR10,
and PURTRE.
9. The ab initio calculations were performed in the program
Jaguar (Jaguar, version 6.0, Schro¨dinger, LLC, New
York, NY, 2005) using the DFT-B3LYP method with
Figure 4. Model of compound 1 (green) docked in the ATP pocket of
the c-Abl kinase (yellow). A CPK representation is given to the gate
keeper residue, a threonine for this kinase. The canonical hydrogen
bonds to the hinge segment are indicated by dashed lines.
tors11 a model of 1 docked in the ATP pocket of one of
these kinases (c-Abl) was constructed (Fig. 4).12 In the
model, the dichlorophenyl moiety of our pyrimidin-4-
yl-urea mimic makes favorable van der Waals contacts
with the hydrophobic back pocket of the ATP binding
site, in particular with the threonine gate keeper resi-
due.13 The model suggests a very tight fit between the
inhibitor and the enzyme in this region of the ATP pock-
et. As a consequence, an adverse steric clash between the
compound and the gate keeper residue is expected if this
is significantly larger than a threonine. In full agreement
with this notion, none of the kinases of the Table 1 panel