Claeys et al.
tives can undergo a variety of reactions making them quite useful
synthetic intermediates in the synthesis of natural products and
analogues.6
While absolute stereocontrol of substituents on the diene or
dienophile is often observed, this is not the case for tether
substituents, which regularly give mixtures of both isomers.7
A detailed spectroscopic elucidation of the products and their
stereochemistry was performed using DIFNOE-NMR and X-ray
analysis. In order to explain the origin of selectivity or duality
of both isomers, theoretical calculations were conducted. They
can reveal whether the process is thermodynamically or kineti-
cally preferred and elucidate the effect of the position of the
carbonyl group on the stereoselectivity. Previous studies have
shown that steric interactions and ring strain in the transition
states are the source of stereoselectivity in intramolecular
Diels-Alder reactions.8 Tether substitutions, ring constraints,
and (planar) functional groups are known to alter the confor-
mational distribution and to restrict the rotations.9,10 The possible
influence of these factors was first investigated on a compound
with the carbonyl group incorporated in the tether, as a 100%
selectivity was observed in that case, using DFT methods:
B3LYP,11 mPW1PW91,12 and BB1K.13 The same DFT meth-
ods, MP2,14 MP3,15 and CCSD16 procedures were used for these
compounds where both isomers were formed.
FIGURE 1. Hindered rotation after acylation of the amine.
previous research it was shown that, when aminoalkyl phos-
phonate 1 (Figure 1) was acylated at nitrogen, there was a
hindered rotation about the C1-N bond.17 It is, however, an
unresolved issue whether this rotational barrier would allow,
hinder, or proliferate the Diels-Alder reaction.
The aminoalkyl phosphonates were synthesized following our
previously reported protocol.18 Subsequent acylations yielded
the corresponding amides 5 in high purity (Scheme 1). With
pivaloyl chloride, however, complex mixtures were obtained
under different reaction conditions.
This acyl group induces both a steric and an electronic
advantage to obtain a reactive substrate for the IMDAF reaction.
When 1-(allylamino)-1-(furan-2-yl)methyl phosphonate 4 was
refluxed overnight in toluene, only minimal amounts, 16%, of
Diels-Alder adducts could be detected using the typical peaks
of C6HaHb at 1.4 and 1.7 ppm. Prolonged refluxing only resulted
in a breakdown of the starting material. However, when the
corresponding amides (5a-e) were refluxed in toluene, complete
conversion to the ring-closed products was observed. In all cases,
a mixture of isomers (6′ and 6′′) was formed, the identity of
which will be discussed further in this paper (Scheme 1).
Experiments with toluene and acetonitrile showed that the first
one was the solvent of choice in most cases: a faster formation
of product and smaller amounts of side products were observed,
probably due to the higher boiling point of toluene.
The order of reactivity was in accordance with the results
reported previously for similar substrates 7 without the phos-
phonate group19 (Scheme 1). With a chloroacetyl group, 20 h
of reflux was required, while the ring-closed product 6e was
already formed during the acylation at room temperature and
subsequent aqueous workup.
In our work, however, a remarkable influence of the phos-
phonate group could be observed. While amides 8a and 8c could
only be obtained in low yield19 because of the poor conversion
(Table 1), the corresponding phosphono amides 6 gave complete
conversion. However, column chromatography caused big losses
of the product due to the presence of a polar group such as the
phosphonate group. The positive influence of increased tether
substitution on IMDAF reactions is often attributed to the
geminal dialkyl substitution and explained by the Thorpe-Ingold
effect, the reactive rotamer, or the facilitated transition effect.4,20
The hindered rotation we already observed in the synthesis of
phosphono-ꢀ-lactams17 will be further investigated.
Experimental Results and Discussion
The suitability of 1-(allylamino)-1-(furan-2-yl)methyl phos-
phonates 5 for the IMDAF reaction was investigated. From
(5) (a) Zhang, H. J.; Padwa, A. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 247–250. (b) Padwa, A.;
Ginn, J. D. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 5197–5206. (c) Wang, Q.; Padwa, A. Org.
Lett. 2004, 6, 2189–2192. (d) Kouznetsov, V. V.; Zubkov, F. I.; Cruz, U. M.;
Voskressensky, L. G.; Mendez, L. Y. V.; Astudillo, L.; Stashenko, E. E. Lett.
Org. Chem. 2004, 1, 37–39. (e) Fokas, D.; Patterson, J. E.; Slobodkin, G.;
Baldino, C. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 5137–5140. (f) Padwa, A.; Eidell,
C. K.; Lynch, S. M. Heterocycles 2002, 58, 227–242. (g) Padwa, A.; Dimitroff,
M.; Liu, B. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3233–3235. (h) Sprague, P. W.; Heikes, J. E.;
Gougoutas, J. Z.; Malley, M. F.; Harris, D. N.; Greenberg, R. J. Med. Chem.
1985, 28, 1580–1590. (i) Sneden, A. T. Synlett 1993, 5, 313–322. (j) Yu, S. Y.;
Beese, G.; Keay, B. A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1992, 2729–2731.
(6) Vogel, P.; Cossy, J.; Plumet, J.; Arjona, O. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 13521–
13624.
(7) (a) Namboothiri, I. N. N.; Ganesh, M.; Mobin, S. M.; Cojocaru, M. J.
Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 2235–2243. (b) Zubkov, F. I.; Boltukhina, E. V.; Turchin,
K. F.; Borisov, R. S.; Varlamov, A. V. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 4099–4113. (c)
Varlamov, A. V.; Zubkov, F. I.; Boltukhina, E. V.; Sidorenko, N. V.; Borisov,
R. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 3641–3643.
(8) (a) Weingarten, M. D.; Prein, M.; Price, A. T.; Snyder, J. P.; Padwa, A.
J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 2001–2010. (b) Turner, C. I.; Williamson, R. M.;
Paddon-Row, M. N.; Sherburn, M. S. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 3963–3969. (c)
Tantillo, D. J.; Houk, K. N.; Jung, M. E. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1938–1940.
(9) Jung, M. E.; Gervay, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 224–232.
(10) Bur, S. K.; Lynch, S. M.; Padwa, A. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 473–476.
(11) (a) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. (b) Stephens,
P. J.; Devlin, F. J.; Chabalowski, C. F.; Frish, M. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98,
11623–11627.
(12) Adamo, C.; Barone, V. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 664–675.
(13) (a) Zhao, Y.; Lynch, B. J.; Truhlar, D. G. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108,
2715–2719. (b) BB95/6-31+G(d) IOp(3/76)0580004200).
(14) (a) Head-Gordon, M.; Pople, J. A.; Frisch, M. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1988,
153, 503–506. (b) Frisch, M. J.; Head-Gordon, M.; Pople, J. A. Chem. Phys.
Lett. 1990, 166, 275–280. (c) Frisch, M. J.; Head-Gordon, M.; Pople, J. A. Chem.
Phys. Lett. 1990, 166, 281–289. (d) Head-Gordon, M.; Head-Gordon, T. Chem.
Phys. Lett. 1994, 220, 122–128. (e) Saebo, S.; Almlof, J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989,
154, 83–89.
(15) (a) Pople, J. A.; Seeger, R.; Krishnan, R. Int. J. Quant. Chem. Symp.
1977, 11, 149–163. (b) Pople, J. A.; Binkley, J. S.; Seeger, R. Int. J. Quant.
Chem. Symp. 1976, 10, 1–19.
(16) (a) Pople, J. A.; Krishnan, R.; Schlegel, H. B.; Binkley, J. S. Int. J.
Quantum Chem. 1978, 14, 545–560. (b) Bartlett, R. J.; Purvis, G. D. J. Quant.
Chem. 1978, 14, 561–581. (c) Purvis, G. D.; Bartlett, R. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1982,
76, 1910–1918. (d) Scuseria, G. E.; Janssen, C. L.; Schaefer, H. F., III. J. Chem.
Phys. 1988, 89, 7382–7387. (e) Scuseria, G. E.; Schaefer, H. F., III. J. Chem.
Phys. 1989, 90, 3700–3703.
The structure of the tricyclic pyrrolidines was confirmed by
its 2D DQFCOSY, HSQC, and HMBC spectra (Supporting
Information) and compared with the data from compounds 8.
1
The H NMR spectrum is characterized by a large difference
(17) (a) Van Speybroeck, V.; Moonen, K.; Hemelsoet, K.; Stevens, C. V.;
Waroquier, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8468–8478. (b) Stevens, C. V.;
Vekemans, W.; Moonen, K.; Rammeloo, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 1619–
1622. (c) Moonen, K.; Stevens, C. V. Synthesis 2005, 3603–3612.
(18) Van Meenen, E.; Moonen, K.; Acke, D.; Stevens, C. V. ArkiVoc 2006,
i, 31–45.
(19) Ghelfi, F.; Parsons, A. F.; Tommasini, D.; Mucci, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 1845–1852.
(20) (a) Bruice, T. C.; Pandit, U. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 5858–
5865. (b) Parrill, A. L.; Dolata, D. P. THEOCHEM 1996, 370, 187–202.
7922 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 20, 2008