and also to inhibit platelet adhesion and aggregation.3-6
Much research has focused on the development of bioma-
terials that mimic the NO-releasing properties of the endot-
helium. Indeed, a variety of synthetic hydrophobic surfaces
that release NO at approximately the desired endothelium
flux all show reduced platelet adhesion and thus enhanced
thromboresistivity compared to NO-free analogues.1
Many NO-releasing biomaterials incorporate an NO donor
based on the diazeniumdiolate [N(O)dNO]- functional
group. Compounds containing this functional group have
proven useful as research tools in a variety of applications
requiring spontaneous release of NO.7 Anions such as
1-(N,N-dialkylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolates 1 are stable
as solid salts, but release up to 2 molar equiv of NO when
dissolved in aqueous solution at physiologically relevant
conditions in an acid-catalyzed dissociation reaction.8
Smith, Keefer, and co-workers first reported the prepara-
tion and study of several NO-releasing polymers containing
diazeniumdiolates in 1996.9 In one case, diazeniumdiolates
were noncovalently dispersed through water-soluble poly-
ethylene glycol (PEG) or biodegradable polycaprolactone
(PCL) matrices by simple mechanical mixing of the melted
polymer and a variety of different diazeniumdiolates. Al-
though diazeniumdiolates survived the blending process with
PEG (at 46 °C) with no appreciable decomposition, those
blended into PCL (at 60 °C) suffered 50% decomposition.
This observation highlights one of the major problems
associated with the development of NO-releasing biomate-
rials of this kind: free diazeniumdiolate anions decompose
readily even at only slightly elevated temperatures making
them impractical for use in standard polymer manufacturing
techniques such as extrusion and injection molding.
Several chemical strategies have been developed for the
protection of dialkylamino-substituted diazeniumdiolates 1.10
These approaches convert 1 to the stable prodrug (O2-
substituted diazeniumdiolate 2) by reaction with a variety
of alkylating or arylating agents that affix electrophilic groups
(R′ in Scheme 1) to the terminal oxygen. These “protected”
diazeniumdiolates can then be converted back to the NO-
releaser 1.
Scheme 1
.
The Dissociation of Diazeniumdiolate 1 and Its
Protection As Prodrug 2
into protein and peptide structures. Since the acid form (λmax
) ca. 320 nm) can easily be distinguished from the basic
form (λmax ) ca. 410 nm) by absorption spectroscopy,
this11,12 and related13,14 reagents have served as environ-
mentally sensitive probes. Reaction with nucleophiles is
initiated by deprotonation of the 2-hydroxy group (pKa )
ca. 7.4) to form a quinone methide intermediate that is
subsequently trapped by the nucleophile.
On the basis of this work, we reasoned that a modified
Koshland’s reagent could serve as a diazeniumdiolate
protecting group that could be removed at pH 7.4 in aqueous
solution. Thus, we synthesized precursor 3 (see the Sup-
porting Information) and examined its aqueous chemistry.
The pH dependence of the absorption spectra of NO
precursor 3, with λmax ) 310 nm for the protonated form
and 405 nm for the deprotonated form, is analogous to that
previously reported for 2-hydroxy-5-nitrobenzyl alcohol (see
the Supporting Information).11 As expected, at pH 7.4 3
decomposes cleanly to benzyl alcohol 4, amine, and NO as
shown in Scheme 2. The half-life (determined by UV-vis
Scheme 2
.
Decomposition of NO Precursor 3 and Its Lipophilic
Analogue 5
2-Hydroxy-5-nitrobenzyl bromide was first introduced by
Koshland et al. as a protein-modification reagent with
selectivity for tryptophan residues in 1964.11 Such modifica-
tion introduces the pH sensitive 4-nitrophenolic functionality
(2) Vaughn, M. W.; Kuo, L.; Liao, J. C. Am. J. Physiol. 1998, 274,
H2163–H2176
.
(3) Gottenbos, B.; van der Mei, H. C.; Busscher, H. J. J. Biomed. Mater.
Res. 2000, 50, 208–214
(4) Razatos, A.; Ong, Y.-L.; Boulay, F.; Elbert, D. L.; Hubbell, J. A.;
.
Sharma, M. M.; Georgiou, G. Langmuir 2000, 16, 9155–9158
.
(5) Chapman, R. G.; Ostuni, E.; Liang, M. N.; Meluleni, G.; Kim, E.;
Yan, L.; Pier, G.; Warren, H. S.; Whitesides, G. M. Langmuir 2001, 17,
absorption spectroscopy) of 3 in pH 7.4 solutions is 25 min
at room temperature and 5 min at 37 °C. For comparison,
1225–1233
.
(6) Arciola, C. R.; Montanaro, L.; Caramazza, R.; Sassoli, V.; Caveda-
gna, D. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1998, 42, 1–5
.
(7) For a recent review, see: Hrabie, J. A.; Keefer, L. K. Chem. ReV.
(11) Koshland, D. E., Jr.; Karkhanis, Y. D.; Latham, H. G. J. Am. Chem.
2002, 102, 1135–1154.
Soc. 1964, 86, 1448–1450
.
(8) Davies, K. M.; Wink, D. A.; Saavedra, J. E.; Keefer, L. K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5473–5481.
(12) Horton, H. R.; Koshland, D. E., Jr J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87,
1126–1132
.
(9) Smith, D. J.; Chakravarthy, D.; Pulfer, S.; Simmons, M. L.; Hrabie,
J. A.; Citro, M. L.; Saavedra, J. E.; Davies, K. M.; Hutsell, T. C.; Mooradian,
D. L.; Hanson, S. R.; Keefer, L. K. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 1148–1156.
(10) Keefer, L. K. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2005, 5, 625–636.
(13) Horton, H. R.; Tucker, W. P. J. Biol. Chem. 1970, 245, 3397–
3401
.
(14) Hojo, T.; Nakamura, H.; Tamura, Z.; Nakajima, T. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 1983, 31, 3350–3352
.
4594
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 20, 2008