M. Levine et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 5746–5750
5749
The most effective catalyst is compound 3, which gave the desired
product in 83–94% yield and up to 45.9% ee. This compound was
more effective than monoamines like L-a-methylvaline 8 (92%
NH2
O
OH
C12H25
HO
S
yield, 2.9 0.5% ee in the presence of Zn(OAc)2), as well as large
polyamine 25 (59% yield, 4.6 1.7% ee in the presence of NiSO4)
and the polyamine-PEG block copolymers 20 (polymer 20a: 96%
yield, 3.1 0.4% ee in the presence of Zn(OAc)2). Compound 3 is
readily accessible from the reduction of the corresponding dipep-
tide. Furthermore, other dipeptide analogues are accessible via
peptide coupling of two amino acids, followed by reduction of
the carbonyls and N-methylation. Future work can be directed
toward the synthesis of other reduced dipeptides and their use
as chiral catalysts.
+
O
N
26
27
chiral amine
CuSO4
Ph
Ph
O
OH
OH
+
In summary, the synthesis of a diverse suite of chiral amines has
H2N
H2N
been described. These chiral amines range in size from an
a-
O
methyl amino acid to polymers with 100 chiral amine residues.
The use of these chiral amines in catalyzing two different organic
reactions has been explored, and the products were synthesized
in moderate to good enantioselectivities. Further applications of
these chiral amines are under investigation, including enamine
catalysis, and will be reported in due course.
28
major
minor
Scheme 2. Transamination of phenylpyruvic acid to phenylalanine.
is structurally similar to polyamine 20b (chiral benzyl groups, all
secondary nitrogens).
Supplementary data
5. Reaction II: the Michael addition
Synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of all new com-
pounds, HPLC parameters, reaction conditions, and full results for
the transamination reaction and the Michael reaction are available.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
We explored the use of the chiral amines in the Michael addi-
tion of dimethylmalonate 30 to azachalcone 29 (Eq. 5). These
efforts complement the work of various other research groups in
the use of chiral organocatalysts in the Michael reaction.17 How-
ever, most of the effective organocatalysts are small molecules,
not organic polymers. The use of a chiral organic polymer could
create a macromolecular chiral and hydrophobic environment for
asymmetric organic reactions.
References and notes
1. (a) Fang, Y.-G.; Zhang, J.; Chen, S.-Y.; Jiang, N.; Lin, H.-H.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, X.-Q.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 696–701; (b) Peña, C.; Alfonso, I.; Voelcker, N.
H.; Gotor, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 2783–2787; (c) Nagamani, D.; Ganesh,
K. N. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 103–106.
2. Garrett, S. W.; Davies, O. R.; Milroy, D. A.; Wood, P. J.; Pouton, C. W.; Threadgill,
M. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2000, 8, 1779–1797.
The choice of this reaction was guided by three primary
considerations:
3. (a) Hérault, D.; Saluzzo, C.; Lemaire, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2006, 17,
1944–1951; (b) Kano, T.; Konishi, S.; Shirakawa, S.; Maruoka, K. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2004, 15, 1243–1245; (c) Dhanda, A.; Drauz, K.-H.; Geller, T.;
Roberts, S. M. Chirality 2000, 12, 313–317.
4. Sinani, V. A.; Gheith, M. K.; Yaroslavov, A. A.; Rakhnyanskaya, A. A.; Sun, K.;
Mamedov, A. A.; Wicksted, J. P.; Kotov, N. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3463–
3472.
5. (a) Lère-Porte, J. P.; Moreau, J. J. E.; Serein-Spirau, F.; Wakim, S. Tetrahedron Lett.
2001, 42, 3073–3076; (b) Elliott, B. L.; Hambley, T. W.; Lawrance, G. A.; Maeder,
M.; Wei, G. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1993, 1725–1730.
6. Zhou, W.; Yerkes, N.; Chruma, J. J.; Liu, L.; Breslow, R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2005, 15, 1351–1355.
7. (a) Roeske, R. W.; Weitl, F. L.; Prasad, K. U.; Thompson, R. M. J. Org. Chem. 1976,
41, 1260–1261; (b) Northrop, R. C.; Russ, P. L. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 4148–4150;
(c) Chu, K. S.; Negrete, G. R.; Konopelski, J. P. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5196–5202.
8. (a) Schwartz, M. A.; Rose, B. F.; Vishnuvajjala, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 612–
613; (b) Ferey, V.; Vedrenne, P.; Toupet, L.; Le Gall, T.; Mioskowski, C. J. Org.
Chem. 1996, 61, 7244–7245; (c) Choi, S.; Bruce, I.; Fairbanks, A. J.; Fleet, G. W. J.;
Jones, A. H.; Nash, R. J.; Fellows, L. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 5517–5520.
1. The mechanism of the Michael reaction involves several steps
that can be catalyzed by a general acid or general base. As poly-
amines titrate over a wide pH range, they are expected to serve
as effective acid–base catalysts.18
2. The chiral polyamines that contain hydrophobic side chains
could create a hydrophobic environment for the hydrophobic
azachalcone 29.
3. Chiral polyamines contain a large number of amino groups that
can bind to a metal center. A variety of metals were tested for
their ability to catalyze the Michael reaction in conjunction
with chiral amines. Nickel sulfate and zinc acetate were found
to give the best results, both in terms of yield and
enantioselectivities.
Michael addition reaction:
O
O
O
O
N
N
O
MeO
N
2
20 mol % amine
+
N
ð5Þ
MeO
OMe
40 mol % metal
1.3 eq. Na2CO3
29
30
31
9. Levine, M.; Kenesky, C. S.; Mazori, D.; Breslow, R. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2433–
2436.
10. Seebach, D.; Fadel, A. Helv. Chim. Acta 1985, 68, 1243–1250.
11. Kotsuki, H.; Sakai, H.; Jun, J.; Shiro, M. Heterocycles 2000, 52, 661–666.
12. Saegusa, T.; Fujii, H.; Ikeda, H. Macromolecules 1972, 5, 108.
The enantioselectivities obtained using chiral amines to cata-
lyze the Michael reaction varied from 0% to 45% ee. In general,
the N-methylated analogues gave better enantioselectivity than
the free NH analogues, especially in the presence of zinc acetate.