droxymethyl)ethane6 as the ligands. Among these reports,
Ma’s work has attracted our attention. In 1998, Ma7 reported
that the structures of R- and ꢀ-amino acids could induce
acceleration of Ullmann-type arylation which led to the
coupling reaction of aryl halides with R- or ꢀ-amino acids
at relatively low temperatures. Soon after these reports,
milder Ullmann-type processes for C-N bond formation
such as N-arylation of amides,8 amines,9 unsaturated
heterocycles,9b and C-O bond formation such as O-arylation
of phenols10 which use amino acids as supporting ligands
have been reported by Ma and co-workers. Because these
copper-catalyzed coupling reactions could be carried out at
a much lower temperature than the traditional copper-
mediated Ullmann coupling protocols, these results repre-
sented a major advance in the development of Ullmann-type
arylation methodology.
On the other hand, a multicomponent reaction plays an
important role in modern organic chemistry since it exhibits
generally a higher atom economy and selectivity, as well as
lower costs, time, and energy. Furthermore, this methodology
allows molecular complexity and diversity to be created by
the facile formation of several new covalent bonds in a one-
pot transformation quite closely approaching the concept of
an ideal synthesis. Inspired by the work of Ma and colleagues
on the copper-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions and en-
deavoring us to develop useful organic transformations taking
advantage of the multicomponent reaction, we were prompted
to construct an aryl C-N bond and a C-O bond in one pot
via copper-catalyzed cross-coupling. Thus, a competitive
experiment was undertaken (Scheme 1) in which a mixture
this case not only 50% yield of the product but also N-(4-
bromphenyl)-proline was isolated. This result clearly indi-
cated that L-proline could couple with 4-bromphenyl iodide
during the reaction, thereby reducing the activity of the
catalytic system. Encouraged by this result, we examined
several amino acids as the ligands. As shown in Table 1,
Table 1. Coupling Reaction of Phenol, Caprolactam, and
4-Bromphenyl Iodide under the Catalysis of CuI and Ligandsa
entry
ligand
solvent
base
yieldb (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
L-proline
glycine
dioxane K3PO4
dioxane K3PO4
50
42
65
23
34
55
78
43
41
70c
82d
69e
78f
N,N-dimethylglycine dioxane K3PO4
2-aminoethanol
1,2-ethandiol
dioxane K3PO4
dioxane K3PO4
N,N-dimethylglycine DMF
N,N-dimethylglycine DMSO
N,N-dimethylglycine DMSO
N,N-dimethylglycine DMSO
N,N-dimethylglycine DMSO
N,N-dimethylglycine DMSO
N,N-dimethylglycine DMSO
N,N-dimethylglycine DMSO
K3PO4
K3PO4
K2CO3
Na2CO3
K3PO4
K3PO4
K3PO4
K3PO4
a Reaction conditions: 4-bromphenyl iodide (1.0 mmol), caprolactam
(1.2 mmol), CuI (0.1 mmol, 10 mol %), ligand (0.2 mmol, 20 mol %), and
base (5.0 mmol) in 3 mL of solvent were stirred at 100 °C for 48 h. Then
phenol (1.2 mmol) was added and stirred at 120 °C for another 48 h.
b Isolated yield. c Using 10 mol % of CuI and 30 mol % of ligand. d Using
15 mol % of CuI and 20 mol % of ligand. e The time of the second reaction
step: 24 h. f The time of the second reaction step: 36 h.
glycine gave a similar result (entry 2), and then we employed
N,N-dimethylglycine as the ligand because this amino acid
is unable to process the N-aryl amination. As expected, N,N-
dimethylglycine gave better conversion in comparison with
L-proline and glycine (compare entries 1 and 3, as well as
entries 2 and 3). Besides the above amino acids, other
bidentate O,O and O,N ligands such as 1,2-ethanediol and
2-aminoethanol were also tested, but these ligands led to a
lower catalytic activity (entries 5 and 4). Using N,N-
dimethylglycine as the ligand, we changed the solvent
dioxane to DMSO, DMF. To our delight, the use of DMSO
gave excellent yield of the product (entry 7). Base effects
were preliminarily surveyed, and K3PO4 was found to be
effective as base; however, K2CO3 and Na2CO3 gave inferior
results (entries 8 and 9). Further optimization of the reaction
conditions revealed that the best ratio between CuI and N,N-
dimethylglycine was 1.5:2 (compare entries 7 and 11, as well
as entries 10 and 11). In addition, we evaluated the effect of
reaction time. The results showed that lower yields of 1-(4-
bromophenyl)azepan-2-one were observed if the time of the
first reaction step was reduced to 24 or 36 h, and lower yields
of product were obtained if the time of the second reaction
step was shortened (entries 12 and 13).
Scheme 1
of CuI catalyst (10 mol %), L-proline (20 mol %), capro-
lactam (1.2 equiv), 4-bromphenyl iodide (1.0 equiv), and
K3PO4 (5.0 equiv) was stirred in dioxane at 100 °C for 48 h,
and then phenol (1.2 equiv) was added into the mixture and
stirred at 120 °C for another 48 h.
The sequence of the reaction was based on that phenol
exhibits higher activity than amide.10,11 It was found that in
(5) Liu, L.; Frohn, M.; Xi, N.; Dominguez, C.; Hungate, R.; Reider,
P. J. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 10135–10138.
(6) Chen, Y. J.; Chen, H. H. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5609–5612.
(7) (a) Ma, D.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, J.; Wu, S.; Tao, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1998, 120, 12459–12467. (b) Ma, D.; Xia, C. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2583–
2586.
The optimized reaction conditions, CuI (15 mol %), N,N-
dimethylglycine (20 mol %), and 5.0 equiv of K3PO4 in
DMSO under nitrogen, were tested by a number of different
amides and phenols. The results were summarized in Table
2. As can be seen, for most cases, the desired products were
(8) Pan, X.; Cai, Q.; Ma, D. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1809–1812.
(9) (a) Ma, D.; Cai, Q.; Zhang, H. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2453–2455. (b)
Zhang, H.; Cai, Q.; Ma, D. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 5164–5173.
(10) Ma, D.; Cai, Q. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3799–3802.
4566
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 20, 2008