bearing exo-methylene groups. Moreover, recent progress of
transition metal-catalyzed multicomponent reactions and
cyclizations using vinyl allenes,3 vinyl allenols, and bis-
(allenes)4 led us to the development of convenient and
selective synthetic methods to these compounds. In the
pursuit of an ongoing program of indium-mediated organic
reactions,5 we reported the efficient synthetic method of vinyl
allenes through Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions using
allenylindium reagent.3f Recently, we required a diverse
range of vinyl allenols in connection with Diels-Alder
reactions,6 Pd-catalyzed multicomponent reactions,3g and Au-
catalyzed cyclizations.7 The addition of organozinc and
organomagnesium reagents obtained from the corresponding
bromide to carbonyl compounds suffers from poor regiose-
lectivity.8 Organochromium reagents, though effective in
reacting with carbonyl compounds to afford vinyl allenols,
were derived from toxic CrCln (n ) 2 and 3) and have not
shown good functional group tolerance due to the use of
LAH.9 LDA-mediated selective addition reaction requires
vinylidenecyclopropanes, which are difficult to prepare.10 As
part of our continuing efforts to expand the synthetic utility
of vinyl allenes,3f,g vinyl allenols, and bis(allenes),11 we now
report highly selective 1,2,4-pentatrien-3-ylation reactions
from the reaction of carbonyl compounds with organoindium
reagents in situ generated from indium and 1-bromopent-4-
en-2-yne derivatives, producing vinyl allenols in good to
excellent yields (Scheme 1).
Table 1. Reaction Optimization of 1,2,4-Pentatrien-3-ylationa
yieldb (%)
entry Met additive (equiv) solvent time (h) 3g
4
5
1
2
3
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
Mg
Zn
DMF
DMF
DMF
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
H2O
1
3
1
1
1
2
3
2
4
1
2
74
57
69
8
1
3
6
12
5
LiCl (3)
LiI (3)
4
27 29 12
73 16
5c
6
LiI (3)
LiI (3)
LiI (1)
LiI (1)
79
51
88
52
42
45
7
3
7
8
11
42
40
7d
8
9
10
Et2O
THF
11e
LiI (1.5)
a 1g was added to organoindium reagent derived from metal (1 equiv)
and 2 (1 equiv) under Grignard-type conditions unless otherwise noted.
b Ratios were determined by 1H NMR analysis after isolation. c In (2 equiv)
and 2 (2 equiv) were used. d Barbier-type conditions. e Zn (1.5 equiv) and
2 (1.5 equiv) were used.
of 1g with organoindium reagent in DMF at 25 °C gave 3g
(74%), 4 (8%), and 5 (6%) (entry 1). The model reaction
afforded the vinyl allenol 3g in 57% and 69% yields in the
presence of additives (3 equiv) such as LiCl and LiI,
respectively (entries 2 and 3). Although 3g was produced in
27% yield in THF without additive (entry 4), the vinyl allenol
3g was obtained in 79% yield in the presence of LiI (3 equiv)
in THF (entry 6). We attempted the present reaction under
the Barbier-type conditions, producing 3g in 51% yield (entry
7). Of the reaction conditions examined, the best results were
obtained with 1g (1 equiv), 2 (1 equiv), and indium (1 equiv)
in the presence of LiI (1 equiv) in THF at 25 °C for 2 h
under a nitrogen atmosphere, affording selectively 3g in 88%
yield and 5 in 8% yield (entry 8). 1-Iodopent-4-en-2-yne was
detected in part in 1H NMR after treatment of 2 with LiI in
THF-d8, indicating that iodide anion substituted bromide in
2 and then the corresponding iodide smoothly reacted with
indium to produce organoindium reagent. The high selectivity
of the present reaction using organoindium reagents was
compared to Grignard and organozinc reagents. Subjecting
1g to 2 and Mg in Et2O gave 3g (42%) and 5 (42%) (entry
10). Similar results were obtained in the case of Zn (1.5
equiv) in the presence of LiI in THF, indicating that
organoindium reagent was superior to other organometallic
Scheme 1
.
Selective 1,2,4-Pentatrien-3-ylation to Carbonyl
Compound
Our initial study focused on the reactions of benzaldehyde
(1g) with organoindium reagent in situ generated from
1-bromopent-4-en-2-yne (2)12 and indium (Table 1). Reaction
(3) (a) Murakami, M.; Ithami, K.; Ito; Yoshihiko, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 1995, 34, 2691. (b) Murakami, M.; Ithami, K.; Ito; Yoshihiko, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11672. (c) Murakami, M.; Ithami, K.; Ito; Yoshihiko,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 3418. (d) Murakami, M.; Itami, K.; Ito,
Y. Synlett 1999, 951. (e) Murakami, M.; Thami, K.; Ito, Y. Organometallics
1999, 18, 1326. (f) Lee, P. H.; Lee, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
3253. (g) Lee, P. H.; Lee, K.; Kang, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1139.
(4) (a) Eaton, B. E.; Rollman, B.; Kaduk, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,
114, 6245. (b) Sigman, M. S.; Kerr, C. E.; Eaton, B. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1993, 115, 7545. (c) Sigman, M. S.; Eaton, B. E. Organometallics 1996,
15, 2829. (d) Sigman, M. S.; Eaton, B. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
11783.
(5) (a) Lee, P. H.; Sung, S.-Y.; Lee, K. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3201. (b)
Lee, K.; Seomoon, D.; Lee, P. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3901.
(c) Seomoon, D.; Lee, K.; Kim, H.; Lee, P. H. Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13,
5197.
(8) Khrimyan, A. P.; Makaryan, G. M.; Badanyan, S. O. Zh. Org. Khim.
1988, 24, 94.
(6) (a) Regas, D.; Afonso, M. M.; Rodriguez, M. L.; Palenzuela, J. A.
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7845. (b) Regas, D.; Ruiz, J. M.; Afonso, M. M.;
Galindo, A.; Palenzuela, J. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 8471. (c) Regas,
D.; Afonso, M. M.; Palenzuela, J. A. Synthesis 2004, 757. (d) Regas, D.;
Ruiz, J. M.; Afonso, M. M.; Palenzuela, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71,
9153. (e) Lee, K.; Lee, P. H. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2008, 29, 487.
(7) Kim, S.; Lee, P. H. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 547.
(9) (a) Delbecq, F.; Baudouy, R.; Gore, J. NouV. J. Chim. 1973, 3, 321.
(b) Doutheau, A.; Gore, J.; Diab, T. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 329.
(10) Lu, J.-M.; Shi, M. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1943.
(11) Yu, H.; Lee, P. H. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 5183.
(12) (a) Clardy, J.; Forsyth, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3497.
(b) Hamze, A.; Provot, O.; Brion, J.-D.; Alami, M. J. Org. Chem. 2007,
72, 3868.
5068
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 21, 2008