7 (a) V. P. Kukhar, V. A. Soloshonok and V. A. Solodenko,
Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem., 1994, 92, 239–264; (b) D.
Enders, A. saint-Dizier, M.-I. Lannou and A. Lenzen, Eur. J. Org.
Chem., 2006, 29–49.
8 (a) H. Groger and B. Hammer, Chem. Eur. J., 2000, 6, 943–948; (b)
J.-A. Ma, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2006, 35, 630–636; (c) P. Merino, E.
Marques-Lopez and R. P. Herrera, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2008, 350,
1195–1208.
9 (a) H. Sasai, S. Arai, Y. Tahara and M. Shibasaki, J. Org. Chem.,
1995, 60, 6656–6657; (b) H. Groger, Y. Saida, S. Arai, J. Martens,
H. Sasai and M. Shibasaki, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37, 9291–9292;
(c) H. Groger, Y. Saida, H. Sasai, K. Yamaguchi, J. Martens and
M. Shibasaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 3089–3103; (d) B.
Saito, H. Egami and T. Katsuki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129,
1978–1986.
10 (a) G. D. Joly and E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126,
4102–4103; (b) T. Akiyama, H. Morita, J. Itoh and K. Fuchibe,
Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 2583–2585; (c) D. Pettersen, M. Marcolini, L.
Bernardi, F. Fini, R. P. Herrera, V. Sgarzani and A. Ricci, J. Org.
Chem., 2006, 71, 6269–6272; (d) S. Nakamura, H. Nakashima, A.
Yamamura, N. Shibata and T. Toru, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2008, 350,
1209–1212; (e) for a short overview, see: L. Bernardi, F. Fini, M.
Fochi and A. Ricci, Chimia, 2007, 61, 224–231; (f) X. Cheng, R.
Goddard, G. Buth and B. List, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47,
5079–5081.
11 (a) M. Petrini, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 3949–3977; (b) non-asym-
metric hydrophosphonylation with a-amido sulfones using NaH:
A. Klepacz and A. Zwierzak, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43,
1079–1080.
12 (a) F. Fini, V. Sgarzani, D. Pettersen, R. P. Herrera, L. Bernardi
and A. Ricci, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 7975–7978; (b) C.
Palomo, M. Oiarbide, A. Laso and L. Lopez, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2005, 127, 17622–17623; (c) O. Marianacci, G. Micheletti, L.
Bernardi, F. Fini, M. Fochi, D. Pettersen, V. Sgarzani and A.
Ricci, Chem. Eur. J., 2007, 13, 8338–8351 and references therein;
(d) B. Niess and K. A. Jørgensen, Chem. Commun., 2007,
1620–1622.
Scheme 2
In conclusion, the development of the first asymmetric
hydrophosphonylation using PTC, allowed to use directly
a-amido sulfones 1 in a new and straightforward protocol for
the hydrophosphonylation of imines, leading to the obtainment
of optically active a-amino phosphonic acid derivatives 3. Good
assets of the present method are the trivial experimental proce-
dures, the easy availability of substrates and catalysts, and the
complementary scope with respect to previously reported orga-
nocatalytic processes. Finally, the possibility of converting very
easily the catalytic adducts into a-amino phosphonic acids and/
or useful intermediates for the synthesis of phosphono-peptides
highlights an additional advantage associated with this strategy.
We acknowledge financial support from Consorzio CINM-
PIS and Stereoselezione in Sintesi Organica Metodologie e
Applicazioni 2005. D. P. is grateful for a post-doctoral fellow-
ship received from the Blancelor foundation, Sweden. The
financial support by the Merck-ADP grant 2007 is also grate-
fully recognised.
13 (a) M. J. O’Donnell, Acc. Chem. Res., 2004, 37, 506–517; (b) B.
Lygo and B. I. Andrews, Acc. Chem. Res., 2004, 37, 518–525; (c) T.
Hashimoto and K. Maruoka, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 5656–5682;
(d) recent examples: S. Santoro, T. B. Poulsen and K. A.
Jørgensen, Chem. Commun., 2007, 5155–5157; (e) J. Aleman, E.
Reyes, B. Richter, J. Overgaard and K. A. Jørgensen, Chem.
Commun., 2007, 3921–3923.
14 In contrast with phosphite esters, most of the nucleophiles used
under PTC conditions (e.g. malonates) are reactive only after
deprotonation.
Notes and references
1 (a) Aminophosphonic and Aminophosphinic Acids, ed. V. P. Kukhar
and H. R. Hudson, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000; (b) P.
Kafarski and B. Lejczak, Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem.,
1991, 63, 193–215.
2 (a) PCT Int. Appl., WO 2007045496, 2007; (b) PCT Int. Appl., WO
2004004658, 2004.
3 J. Bird, R. C. D. Mello, G. P. Harper, D. J. Hunter, E. H. Karran,
R. E. Markwell, A. J. Miles-Williams, S. S. Rahman and R. W.
Ward, J. Med. Chem., 1994, 37, 158–169.
4 (a) J. G. Allen, F. R. Atherton, M. J. Hall, C. H. Hassal, S. W.
Holmes, R. W. Lambert, L. J. Nisbet and P. S. Ringrose, Nature,
1978, 272, 56–58; (b) F. R. Atherton, C. H. Hassal and R. W.
Lambert, J. Med. Chem., 1986, 29, 29–40; (c) Z. Wu and C. T.
Walsh, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1995, 92, 11603–11607.
5 W. W. Smith and P. A. Bartlett, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120,
4622–4628.
6 (a) J. E. Hanson, A. P. Kaplan and P. A. Bartlett, Biochemistry,
1989, 28, 6294–6305; (b) A. P. Kaplan and P. A. Bartlett, Biochem-
istry, 1991, 30, 8165–8170; (c) P. A. Bartlett and C. K. Marlowe,
Science, 1987, 235, 569–571; (d) P. A. Bartlett, J. E. Hanson and P.
G. Giannousis, J. Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 6268–6274; (e) for an
excellent review, see: J. Hiratake and J. Oda, Biosci. Biotechnol.
Biochem., 1997, 61, 211–218.
15 A possible influence of the inorganic base on the tautomerism,
favouring the phosphite form, should also be considered: B.
Springs and P. Haake, J. Org. Chem., 1977, 42, 472–474.
16 The deprotonated nucleophile acting as a base, and not the
inorganic component, is usually responsible for the formation of
the imine in this type of transformations. See ref. 12c.
17 K. Kacprzak and J. Gawronski, Synthesis, 2001, 961–998.
18 (a) S.-s. Jew, M.-S. Yoo, B.-S. Jeong, I. Y. Park and H.-g. Park,
Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 4245–4248; (b) M.-S. Yoo, B.-S. Jeong, J.-H.
Lee, H.-g. Park and S.-s. Jew, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 1129–1131.
19 Using cat. 4b, 5 equiv. K2CO3, r.t.: diphenyl phosphite: 0% ee;
diisopropyl phosphite: 0% ee; dimethyl phosphite: 40% ee; diben-
zyl phosphite: 37% ee.
20 The competition for the quaternary ammonium salt of the lipophilic
sulfinate anion (generated during the formation of the imine) with
the deprotonated phosphite can be the reason for the necessity of
using an excess of phosphite, and for the long reaction time (60 h).
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
Chem. Commun., 2008, 4345–4347 | 4347