5208
Y. Tong et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 5206–5208
erated. Replacing the proton at R3 of compound 1 with an alkyl
species larger than a methyl resulted in inhibitors with at least
12-fold less potency against Pim-1 (see Table 1, 9 to 13) and also
with less activity against Pim-2. The methylated inhibitor 9 was as-
sayed as a mixture (ꢁ1:1) of two regio-isomers.7 Since 9 was only
slightly less active than 1 (Pim-1 Ki: 50.1 nM vs 21.8 nM) it does
not appear that methylation had much impact electronically on
the H-bond between the carbonyl of the isoxazolone and Lys67.
In addition, neither isomer by itself would be significantly more
potent than 1. However, 9 did suffer a loss of potency against
Pim-2.
In order to take advantage of a potential hydrogen bond between
the ligand and the hinge region of Pim-1 kinase, the fluoro group on
the benzene ring of 1 was replaced with a hydroxyl. As shown in
Fig. 2, the hydroxyl group on inhibitor 19 can donate an H-bond to
Glu121 O with a desirable distance of 3.0 Å. The impact of this
designed hydrogen bond on affinity was uncertain because of the
complicated energetics of solvation/desolvation of ligand, protein,
and protein-ligand complex.9 Additionally, any lone-pair repulsion
between the fluoro group of 1 and Glu121 O would presumably be
eliminated in 19 and could also be a factor in any potency change.
Without a clear prediction from this complex interplay of molecular
forces, we were able to evaluate compound 19 and found that its hy-
droxy improved the Ki value (Pim-1) of 19 over 1 by about 8 fold
(2.5 nMvs21.8 nM, Table1). Compound19alsodisplayedhigherpo-
tency against Pim-2 as compared to 1 (43.5 nM vs 174 nM). The
importance of the hydroxyl group on 19 was further demonstrated
by inhibitor 18 where the hydroxyl was replaced by a methoxy,
showing much reduced activities against both Pim-1 and Pim-2
(2698 nM and >1424 nM, respectively, Table 1). Compound 19 was
assayed in a panel of 22 serine/threonine kinases (Table 2) and dis-
played an activity profile with a high degree of selectivity. As com-
pared to its potent inhibitory activity against Pim-1 (6.3 nM in this
assay format), this molecule was weak against all other kinases
Table 2
Kinase selectivity profile of 19
Kinase
Ki (
l
M)a
Kinase
Ki (lM)
Pim-1
Src
Zipk
0.0063
>1.94
0.0273
>8.91
>8.57
1.73
>8.21
>6.88
>6.67
>8.78
>9.52
CTAK1
Casein2
Gsk3a
MARK
PKA
PKCd
PKC c
PKCn
Plk1
Rock1
Rock2
>6.67
1.07
1.11
Cdc2
>8.44
>7.50
>8.89
>8.75
>8.33
>8.89
>9.11
>7.50
Cdk2
AMPK
Akt1
Aurora1
Aurora2
Chk1
Chk2
a
6-point screening format.11
pocket and thus resulted in a more potent inhibitor, 19, with Ki val-
ues at 2.5 and 43.5 nM against Pim-1 and Pim-2, respectively.
Compound 19 also exhibited a high degree of selectivity against
other serine/threonine kinases.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Dr. Daniel Chu for earlier synthetic work.
References and notes
1. (a) Cuypers, H. T.; Selten, G.; Quint, W.; Zijlstra, M.; Robanus-Manndag, E.;
Boelens, W.; van Wezenbeek, P.; Melief, C.; Berns, A. Cell 1984, 37, 141; (b) van
Lohuizen, M.; Verbeek, S.; Krimpenfort, P.; Domen, J.; Saris, C.; Radaszkiewicz,
R.; Berns, A. Cell 1989, 56, 673.
2. (a) van der Lugt, N. M.; Domen, J.; Verhoeven, E.; Linders, K.; van der Gulden,
H.; Allen, J.; Berns, A. EMBO J. 1995, 14, 2536; (b) Mikkers, H.; Allen, J.;
Knipscheer, P.; Romeyn, L.; Hart, A.; Vink, E.; Berns, A. Nat. Genet. 2002, 32, 153.
3. review (a) Amaravadi, R.; Thompson, C. B. J. Clin. Invest. 2005, 115, 2618; (b)
Amson, R.; Sigaux, F.; Przedborski, S.; Flandrin, G.; Givol, D.; Telerman, A. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 1989, 86, 8857; c 1b.; (d) Cohen, A. M.; Grinblat, B.; Bessler, H.;
Kristt, D. A.; Kremer, A.; Shalom, S.; Schwartz, A.; Halperin, M.; Merkel, D.; Don,
J. Leuk. Lymphoma 2004, 45, 951.
4. Fox, C. J.; Hammerman, P. S.; Thompson, C. B. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 201, 259.
5. Valdman, A.; Fang, X.; Pang, S. T.; Ekman, P.; Egevad, L. Prostate 2004, 60, 367.
6. (a) Qian, K. C.; Wang, L.; Hickey, E. R.; Studts, J.; Barringer, K.; Peng, C.;
Kronkaitis, A.; Li, J.; White, A.; Mische, S.; Farmer, B. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280,
6130; (b) Jacobs, M. D.; Black, J.; Futer, O.; Swenson, L.; Hare, B.; Fleming, M.;
Saxena, K. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 13728; (c) Kumar, A.; Mandiyan, V.; Suzuki,
Y.; Zhang, C.; Rice, J.; Tsai, J.; Artis, D. R.; Ibrahim, P.; Bremer, R. J. Mol. Biol.
2005, 348, 183; (d) Pierce, A. C.; Jacobs, M.; Stuver-Moody, C. J. Med. Chem.
2008, 51, 1972; (e) Cheney, I. W.; Yan, S.; Appleby, T.; Walker, H.; Vo, T.; Yao,
N.; Hamatake, R.; Hong, Z.; Wu, J. Z. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 1679.
7. 9 is a mixture (ꢁ1:1) of the following two compounds:
tested (Ki values at least over 1 lM) except Zipk (Ki = 27.3 nM).
In conclusion, guided by molecular modeling and known X-ray
co-crystal structures, we have carried out a concise SAR study fol-
lowing an HTS hit (1) and demonstrated that compounds with a
novel isoxazolo[3,4-b]quinoline-3,4(1H,9H)-dione core can serve
as potent inhibitors for Pim-1 and Pim-2 kinases. The R2 position
of the tricyclic core can tolerate various alkyl groups due to the
availability of space in the kinase active site. At R3 only a small
group, such as a proton or a methyl, can maintain the inhibitory
activity of the molecules. Installing a hydroxyl group on the ben-
zene ring (replacing F on 1) of the core has the potential to form
an optimal H-bond interaction to the hinge region of the binding
O
O
O
O
F
F
+
O
N
N
O
Cl
N
Cl
N
.
8. Takaishi, H.; Kishida, M.; Miura, Y. Japan Patent 4-356438, 1992.
9. (a) Foloppe, N.; Fisher, L. M.; Howes, R.; Kierstan, P.; Potter, A.; Robertson, A. G.
S.; Surgenor, A. E. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4332; (b) Hunenberger, P. H.; Helms,
V.; Narayana, N.; Taylor, S. S.; McCammon, J. A. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 2358.
10. Pim kinase assays: Assays were conducted as follows with final concentrations
as listed. In 384-well v-bottom polypropylene plates, 10 ml compound (2%
DMSO), was mixed with 20 ml of Pim-1 (50pM), or Pim-2 (500pM) and peptide
substrate (biotin-C6linker-VRRLRRLTAREAA) (2 mM), followed by immediate
initiation with 20 ml k-[33 P]-ATP (5 mM, 2 mCi/mmol) using a reaction buffer
comprising 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 0.5 mM DTT, 10 mM MgCl2, 100 mM
Na3VO4, 0.075 mg/ml Triton X-100. Reactions were quenched after 1hr by
the addition of 50 ml stop buffer (50 mM EDTA, 2 M NaCl). 80 mL of the
stopped reactions were transferred to 384-well streptavidin-coated plates
(FlashPlate Plus, Perkin-Elmer), incubated 30 min at rt and washed 3 times
with 0.05% Tween-20/PBS using an ELX-405 automated plate washer (BioTek),
and counted on a TopCount Scintillation Plate Reader (Packard).
11. In vitro kinase selectivity assays: Assays were conducted exactly as described
for the Pim in vitro assay (Ref. 10) except for the enzyme concentration and
substrate used, which were custom to each kinase. Substrates were either
chosen from those described in literature/vendor protocols or identified
through screening of a 720 peptide Jerini Kinase Substrate Set (Jerinin AG).
Kinases specific reagents (phosphotidyl serine, diacyl glycerol, calcium
chloride, calmodulin, cGMP) were employed only where required.
Figure 2. Model of 19 in Pim-1 kinase with similar protein interactions as 1 (Fig. 1)
with the designed hydrogen bond to the backbone carbonyl of Glu 123.