Photophysics and Photochemistry of Naphthoxazinone
Conclusions
respectively. All measurements were carried out in nitrogen-purged
solutions at (20 ( 0.5) °C.
The photophysics of the naphthoxazinone derivatives studied
in this work is strongly dependent on the position of oxazolinone
ring on the naphthalene moiety. Phenantrene-like naphthoxazi-
nones exhibit fluorescence quantum yields higher than the less-
aromatic anthracene-like homologous. In contrast, the latter
show the strongest dependence of the emission maxima on the
solvent polarity, indicating an important charge separation in
the singlet excited state. Although all compounds are essentially
photostable in the absence of additives, formation of a naph-
thoxazole derivative from the triplet excited-state is observed,
albeit with very low quantum yield. The presence of electron
donors such as amines enhances the photoconsumption quantum
yield and changes the product distribution by opening a
photoreaction mechanism mediated by electron transfer to the
excited triplet state. Their photophysical properties and large
photostability in air-equilibrated solutions suggest that naph-
thoxazinone derivatives could be valuable dyes for dye laser
applications (3) as well as for singlet oxygen photosensitization
(2).
Photoconsumption quantum yields under several experimental
conditions were evaluated using the self-sensitized photooxygen-
ation of 9,10-dimethylanthracene in air saturated Freon 113 (Φ )
0.566).42,43 The photon flux, q/einstein s-1 was calculated according
to eq 3:
∆A(324 nm)V
Φ(λ)ε(324 nm)tl
q )
(3)
with t ) irradiation time, V ) volume of the solution, l ) optical
path length, Φ(λ) ) photo-oxigenation quantum yield, and ε(324
nm) ) molar absorption coefficient. Time-dependent naphthoxazi-
none photoconsumption was measured from its absorption spectra
and/or by the decreasing of the peak area in the GC-NPD
chromatogram. Additional experiments using the benzophenone/
benzhydrol actinometer44,45 were performed to confirm values in
selected experiments. Not more than 20% of a difference between
the two actinometers employed was observed for a given experiment.
The rate constant for quenching of the naphthoxazinone singlet
state by a series of amines (1kq) was determined from a Stern-Volmer
analysis of the amine effect on the naphthoxazinone steady-state
fluorescence intensity using eq 4:
Experimental Details
I0
I
Materials. All solvents used in the syntheses and spectroscopic
and kinetic measurements were of reagent grade, were of spectro-
scopic or HPLC quality, and were purified by the usual procedures
when necessary.36
) 1 + KSV[Q]
(4)
where I0 and I are the areas under the fluorescence spectrum at
zero and higher concentrations of the amine, respectively, and KSV
is the Stern-Volmer constant () kq τ0 , where τ0 is the singlet
Chemical Synthesis. Naphthoxazinones-derivatives were ob-
tained by employing a modification of the Moffet method.37
2-Phenyl-3H-naphtho[2,1-b][1,4]-oxazin-3-one (1).34,38 Freshly
distilled methyl benzoylformiate (2.09 mmol) and 1-aminonaphthol
(2.75 mmol) in 20 mL of etanol/pyridine were heated at 110 °C by
1 h in a flask equipped with a reflux condenser and a magnetic
stirrer. The precipitate obtained by cooling the mixture in ice-water
bath was filtered and washed at least three times each with: water,
diluted HCl, and water. Finally, the dry solid was recrystallized
from acetonitrile to yield 0.75 g (80%) of the product as a yellow
crystalline solid, mp 173.5-174.5 °C. Lit.32 174-175 °C. 1H NMR
(CDCl3): δ 7.37 [d, 1H, J ) 9.0 Hz]; 7.49 [m, 3H]; 7.53 [dd, 1H];
7.65 [dd, 1H]; 7.83 [d, 1H, J ) 8.1 Hz]; 7.90 [d, 1H, J ) 9.0 Hz];
8.46 [m, 2H]; 8.84 [d, 1H, J ) 8.35 Hz]. 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ
116.1; 123.3; 126.8; 127.1; 128.5; 128.7; 128.8d; 129.8d; 130.9;
131.5; 131.7; 132.8; 134.9; 145.2; 148.8. IR (KBr): cm-1 1725.7
(CdO); 1584.9 (CdN); Elem. anal. calcd %C: 79.11; %H: 4.06;
%N: 5.13; exp. %C: 79.11; %H: 4.08; %N: 5.43.
Methods. The fluorescence quantum yields (ΦF) were measured
by the comparative method described by Eaton and Demas,39,40
using quinine sulfate in 0.1 N sulfuric acid (ΦF ) 0.55)41 or
fluorescein in 0.1 N NaOH (ΦF ) 0,92)41 as references. Optical
densities of sample and reference solutions were set below 0.2 at
the excitation wavelength, and the fluorescence spectra were
corrected by using rhodamine G as reference. Sample quantum yield
was evaluated by using eq 2:
1
S
S
lifetime at zero amine concentration).
Fluorescence lifetimes, τ0 , were measured by employing the
S
phase demodulation method using fluorescein as reference (τ0
)
S
4.05 ns).46,47 Phase shift and emission demodulation were employed
to calculate τ0 according to eqs 5 and 6:
S
τp ) ω-1 tan φ
(5)
(6)
1/2
1
τm ) ω-1 2 - 1
(
)
m
where τp is the phase lifetime, τm the demodulation lifetime, ω the
circular frequency of the incident light, φ the phase angle displace-
ment, and m is the demodulation factor. Measured values gave τp
) τm ) τ0 , indicating monoexponential fluorescence decays.
S
Rate constants for quenching of the triplet state by TEA were
determined examining the effect of this amine on the rate of triplet
decay. In the presence of a quencher, the observed pseudofirst order
rate constant for triplet decay, 3kobs, increases linearly as shown in
eq 7:
3kobs ) 1 ⁄ τT ) 1 ⁄ τT0 + 3kTqEA[TEA]
Values of kTqEA were deduced from the slope of the linear plot
(7)
3
3
of kobs vs the concentration of TEA.
Gradx
ηx2
(40) Demas, J. N.; Crosby, G. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1971, 75, 991–1024.
(41) Heller, C. A.; Henry, R. A.; McLaughlin, B. A.; Bliss, D. E. J. Chem.
Eng. Data 1974, 19, 214–219.
Φx )
ΦAct
(2)
(
)
2
(
)
GradAct
ηAct
(42) Adick, H.-J.; Schmidt, R.; Brauer, H.-D. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A:
Chem. 1988, 45, 89–96.
where GradX and GradAct are the slope of integrated fluorescence
vs absorbance plots for the sample and the actinometer, respectively,
and ηx and ηAct are the refractive index of sample and actinometer,
(43) Kuhn, H. J.; Braslavsky, S. E.; Schmidt, R. Pure Appl. Chem. 2004,
76, 2105–2146.
(44) Borderie, B.; Lavabre, D.; Levy, G. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.
1991, 56, 13–23.
(36) Wiberg, K. B. Laboratory technique in organic chemistry; McGraw-
Hill: New York, 1960.
(45) Murov, S. L. Handbook of Photochemistry, 2nd ed.; Marcel Dekker,
New York, 1993; Sect. 13, p 307.
(37) Mofett, R. B. J. Med. Chem. 1966, 9, 475–478.
(38) Ma´rquez, A.; Saitz, C.; Can˜ete, A.; Rodr´ıguez, H.; Jullian, C. Mag.
Reson. Chem. 1998, 36, 449–453.
(46) Nunnally, B. K.; He, H.; Li, L.-C.; Tucker, S. A.; McGown, L. B. Anal.
Chem. 1997, 69, 2392–2397.
(47) Pant, S.; Tripathi, H. B.; Pant, D. D. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.
1994, 81, 7–11.
(39) Eaton, D. F. Pure Appl. Chem. 1988, 60, 1107–1114.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 14, 2008 5377