G Model
PRBI-10667; No. of Pages8
ARTICLE IN PRESS
4
L. Cai et al. / Process Biochemistry xxx (2016) xxx–xxx
J = 14.0, 4.4 Hz), 2.63 (1H, dd, J = 14.0, 4.4 Hz), 2.55 (3H, s, NCH3),
2.39 (1H, t, J = 10.0 Hz, H-5b).
(R)-MTPA ester of 1b: white amorphous powder; ESIMS m/z
572 [M+H]+; HRESIMS m/z 572.1895 (Calcd. for C30H29F3NO7
572.1891); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): ıH 7.61 (1H, s), 7.59 (2H,
m), 7.44 (3H, m), 6.76 (1H, s), 6.27 (1H, s, H-3), 6.26 (1H, m), 6.06
(1H, s), 5.92 (1H, s), 3.91 (3H, s), 3.88 (3H, s), 3.58 (3H, s) 3.50 (1H,
dd, J = 10.0, 6.4 Hz, H-5a), 3.19 (1H, dd, J = 14.0 Hz, H-6a), 3.07 (1H,
dd, J = 14.0, 4.4 Hz), 2.63 (1H, dd, J = 14.0, 4.4 Hz), 2.58 (3H, s, NCH3),
2.49 (1H, t, J = 10.0 Hz, H-5b).
(4R,6aR)-4-Hydroxyromerine (2b): white amorphous powder;
25
␣
[
−9.89 (c 0.020, MeOH); ESIMS m/z 296 [M+H]+; HRESIMS
]
D
m/z 296.1284 (Calcd. for C18H18NO3 296.1281); 1H NMR (CDCl3,
400 MHz) ıH 7.03 (1H, s, H-3), 4.95 (1H, br s, H-4), 3.31 (1H, dd,
J = 10.0, 5.6 Hz, H-5a), 2.36 (1H, t, J = 10.0 Hz, H-5b), 3.24 (1H, br
d, J = 12.4 Hz, H-6a), 3.17 (1H, br d, J = 12.4 Hz, H-7a), 2.68 (1H, t,
J = 12.4 Hz, H-7b), 7.30-7.34 (3H, m, H-8, 9, 10), 8.07 (1H, s, H-11),
6.11 (1H, s, (OCH2O)a), 5.96 (1H, s, (OCH2O)b), 2.58 (3H, s, NCH3);
13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) ıC 147.5 (s, C-1), 116.1 (s, C-1a), 130.8
(s, C-1b), 143.8 (s, C-2), 105.5 (d, C-3), 127.8 (s, C-3a), 66.7 (d, C-4),
61.6 (t, C-5), 62.3 (d, C-6a), 34.3 (t, C-7), 135.3 (s, C-7a), 127.8 (d,
C-8), 127.3 (d, C-9), 127.1 (d, C-10), 128.4 (d, C-11), 140.0 (s, C-11a),
101.1 (t, OCH2O), 43.3 (q, NCH3).
Fig. 2. HPLC chromatograms of methanol extracts from non-fermented (A) and C.
rogersoniana-fermented (B) S. epigaea.
(4R,6aR)-4-Hydroxy-N-methyllaurotetanine (3b): white amor-
25
D
phous powder; ␣
−16.3 (c 0.020, MeOH); ESIMS m/z 358
[
]
[M+H]+; HRESIMS m/z 358.1655 (Calcd. for C20H24NO5 358.1649);
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) ıH 6.87 (1H, s, H-3), 4.51 (1H, br s, H-4),
3.14 (1H, br d, J = 10.0 Hz, H-5a), 2.71 (1H, br d, J = 10.0 Hz, H-5b),
3.03 (1H, br d, J = 10.0 Hz, H-6a), 2.98 (1H, dd, J = 10.0, 4.4 Hz, H-7a),
2.60 (1H, m, H-7b), 6.82 (1H, s, H-8), 8.06 (1H, s, H-11), 3.67 (3H,
s, OCH3-1), 3.92 (3H, s, OCH3-2), 3.90 (3H, s, OCH3-10), 2.58 (3H, s,
NCH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) ıC 145.6 (s, C-1), 126.1 (s, C-1a),
131.8 (s, C-1b), 152.8 (s, C-2), 111.1 (d, C-3), 122.6 (s, C-3a), 67.0
(d, C-4), 60.7 (t, C-5), 62.8 (d, C-6a), 33.9 (t, C-7), 130.5 (s, C-7a),
114.1 (d, C-8), 145.2 (s, C-9), 145.9 (s, C-10), 111.3 (d, C-11), 123.9
(s, C-11a), 60.2 (q, OCH3-1), 55.9 (s, OCH3-2), 56.2 (s, OCH3-10), 43.8
(q, NCH3).
Fig. 3. Key 1H–1H COSY (
1b.
), HMBC (
) and NOESY (
) correlations of
results suggest the presence of a hydroxyl group substituted at C-4
or C-7 in compound 1b. Heteronuclear multiple-bond correlations
(HMBCs) (Fig. 3) from H-4 (ıH 4.93 (1H, br d, J = 4.4 Hz)) to C-3a
(ıC 126.7 s), C-1b (ıC 130.9 s), and C-5 (ıC 61.5 t) confirmed that
the hydroxyl group was substituted at C-4. Therefore, the planar
structure of 1b was identified as 4-hydroxydicentrine.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Screening of biotransformation
The absolute configuration of the newly installed chiral center
at C-4 was determined using the advanced Mosher’s method [19].
The treatment of 1b with (R)- and (S)-MTPA-OH (␣-methyloxy-
trifluoromethylphenylacetic acid) yielded (R)- and (S)-MTPA ester
derivatives, respectively. The calculation of the 1H NMR ꢂıS-R
values for the mono-MTPA esters of 1b confirmed an R absolute con-
figuration at C-4 (Fig. 4). The absence of a NOESY correlation (Fig.
S12) from H-4 (ıH 4.93 (1H, br d, J = 4.4 Hz)) to H-6a (ıH 3.19 (1H, br
d, J = 18.0 Hz)), combined with the absolute configuration of 1a, con-
firmed the R configuration at C-6a of 1b. The (4R,6aR)-isomer was
ture of 1b was established to be (4R,6aR)-4-hydroxydicentrine.
4-Hydroxyaporphine alkaloids are a type of alkaloid found
in a few natural sources, such as plants of Launelia philippiana
[20], Glaucium vitellinum [21], and S. venosa [22], among others.
This paper might provide an approach for finding new natural 4-
hydroxyaporphine alkaloids.
Sixteen plant pathogenic fungi were initially screened for their
ability to catalyze biotransformation reactions using S. epigaea as
the substrate. HPLC and TLC were used to monitor the transforma-
tion process during fermentation. The HPLC (Fig. 2) and TLC (Fig.
S1) experiments revealed that C. rogersoniana fermentation could
facilitate prominent biotransformation.
3.2. Identification of 1a and 1b
The primary metabolized compound 1a in the original material
was isolated as a white amorphous power and identified to be (R)-
dicentrine based on NMR data (Table 1) analysis [2] and comparing
its experimental and calculated ECD spectra (Fig. S5).
The corresponding compound 1b produced after fermentation
was isolated as a white amorphous power, and its molecular for-
mula was deduced to be C20H21NO5 by HRESIMS at m/z 356.1494
[M+H]+ (calcd. for C20H22NO5 356.1492). The NMR spectra of com-
pound 1b (Table 1) presented the characteristic NMR features of an
aporphine alkaloid. Comparison of the NMR data between 1b and
1a revealed that the primary difference is that 1b contains only two
methylenes, which is one less than 1a. Compound 1b also presented
signals for an additional oxygenated methine (ıH 4.93 (1H, br d,
J = 4.4 Hz), ıC 66.5 d). Together with its molecular formula, these
3.3. Solid-state fermentation of aporphine alkaloids
To confirm the biotransformation between (R)-dicentrine
and (4R,6aR)-4-hydroxydicentrine, (R)-dicentrine was used as
substrate in the biotransformation. Potatoes, without (4R,6aR)-4-
hydroxydicentrine or (R)-dicentrine, were used as the fermentation
Please cite this article in press as: L. Cai, et al., An improved water-soluble/stereospecific biotransformation of apor-
phine alkaloids in Stephania epigaea to 4R-hydroxyaporphine alkaloids by Clonostachys rogersoniana, Process Biochem (2016),