Table 2 Rate constants for reactions of 11–14 with peroxyl radicals
at 25 1C in benzene using the peroxyester-based radical clock ap-
proach. Literature values at 30 1C are presented for comparison
Table 3 KSEs on the reactions of 11–14 with peroxyl radicals given
as the slopes of correlations of log kSH vs, bH2 (see ESIw) compared with
that expected from eqn (4)
Slope (R)
a2H
ꢃ8.3aH2
11
12
13
14
ꢃ5.9 (0.98)
ꢃ4.9 (0.99)
ꢃ2.9 (0.98)
ꢃ2.5 (0.99)
0.573
0.374
0.216
0.324
ꢃ4.8
ꢃ3.1
ꢃ1.8
ꢃ2.7
Clock kH/Mꢃ1 sꢃ1
Lit. kH/Mꢃ1 sꢃ1
Ref.
11
12
13
14
4.4(ꢁ0.1) ꢂ 104
1.7(ꢁ0.3) ꢂ 105
3.0(ꢁ0.2) ꢂ 104
5.3(ꢁ0.6) ꢂ 104
2.6 ꢂ 104
8.5 ꢂ 104
1.9 ꢂ 104
1.5 ꢂ 104
13
14
14
15
DPPHꢀ have been described as solvent-independent,19,20 the
reactivities of peroxyl radicals may be expected to display some
solvent dependence, as they are subject to significant dipole–
dipole12 and H-bonding21 interactions.
This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and
Engineering Research Council of Canada and Queen’s
University. DAP also acknowledges the Canada Research
Chairs program.
Notes and references
Scheme 3
1 G. Litwinienko and K. U. Ingold, Acc. Chem. Res., 2007, 40, 222–230.
2 B. Roschek, Jr, K. A. Tallman, C. L. Rector, J. G. Gillmore, D. A.
Pratt, C. Punta and N. A. Porter, J. Org. Chem., 2006, 71, 3527–3532.
3 Despite its inclusion in ref. 2 and our own extensive efforts, we have
repeatedly failed to obtain a rate constant for BHT by this method.
4 M. Wijtmans, D. A. Pratt, L. Valgimigli, G. A. DiLabio, G. F. Pedulli
and N. A. Porter, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 4370–4373.
5 P. D. Bartlett and R. R. Hiatt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1958, 80,
1398–1402.
literature value was estimated from an inhibited autoxidation
of styrene for which no well-defined inhibition period was
observed.15
Until now, only KSEs for reactions of alkoxyl radicals (i.e.
t-butoxyl) and hydrazyl radicals (i.e. 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-
hydrazyl, DPPHꢀ) with phenols have been systematically
determined.1 The KSEs observed in these reactions are domi-
nated by the H-bonding interaction between the phenols
(ArOH) and H-bond accepting solvents (S), which effectively
‘tie up’ the phenolic O–H, preventing abstraction of the
H-atom by the radical (Yꢀ, Scheme 3).
6 We suspect that some (if not all) of the decomposition we observe may
be induced by a-TOH, which yields the same products as homolysis.
7 From the ratio of 10 to 8a determined as a function of [a-TOH] we
estimate a rate constant for the cyclization of the cinnamoxyl radical
9
of 5.1 ꢂ 106 sꢃ1 from k = 2.8 ꢂ 108 Mꢃ1 sꢃ1 for a-TOH + ROꢀ
.
8 By comparison with authentic materials synthesized indepen-
dently, as in X. Xie, G. Yue, S. Tang, X. Huo, Q. Liang, X. She
and X. Pan, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 4057–4059.
Ingold and co-workers have expressed the rate constant for
HAT from phenol to a radical in a given solvent (kSH) in terms
of the H-bond accepting ability of the solvent (given by its b2H
parameter16) and the H-bond donating ability of the phenol
(given by its aH2 parameter17) as in eqn (4).18 This equation is
believed to be valid for the prediction of KSEs on HAT
reactions since they are assumed to be independent of the
nature of the abstracting radical, i.e. any interaction of the
abstracting radical with the solvent does not substantially
affect its reactivity.18 However, since eqn (4) was derived from
data for reactions of phenols with t-butoxyls and DPPHꢀ, we
wondered whether the reactions of phenols with peroxyls—
arguably the most important radical reaction undergone by
phenols—would also obey the relationship.
9 L. Valgimigli, J. T. Banks, J. Lusztyk and K. U. Ingold, J. Org.
Chem., 1999, 64, 3381–3383.
10 While cumylperoxyl is a tertiary peroxyl and 3a is a secondary peroxyl,
rate constants determined by flash photolysis using cumylperoxyl are
indistinguishable from those determined by inhibited autoxidations
whose chain reactions are carried by secondary peroxyls, see ref. 9.
11 Y. P. Tsentalovich and H. Fischer, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2,
1994, 729–733.
12 The dipole moment in benzylperoxyl has been determined to be
(2.4 ꢁ 0.2) D, see R. W. Fessenden, A. Hitachi and V. Nagarajan,
J. Phys. Chem., 1984, 88, 107–110, and peroxyl radicals are
predicted to be highly polarizable by solvent, see P. Aplincourt,
M. F. Ruiz-Lopez, X. Assfeld and F. Bohr, J. Comput. Chem.,
1999, 20, 1039–1048.
13 J. A. Howard, in Radical Reaction Rates in Liquids, ed. W.
Martienssen, Landolt-Bornstein, Springer, New York, 1996, vol.
¨
18, pp. 1–434.
log kSH = log kH0 ꢃ 8.3aH2 bH2
(4)
14 G. W. Burton, T. Doba, E. Gabe, L. Hughes, F. L. Lee, L. Prasad
and K. U. Ingold, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 107, 7053–7065.
15 M. Lucarini, P. Pedrielli, G. F. Pedulli, L. Valgimigli, D. Gigmes
and P. Tordo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 11546–11553.
16 M. H. Abraham, P. L. Grellier, D. V. Prior, P. P. Duce, J. J. Morris
and P. J. Taylor, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1989, 699–711.
17 M. H. Abraham, P. L. Grellier, D. V. Prior, J. J. Morris and P. J.
Taylor, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1990, 521–529.
18 D. W. Snelgrove, J. Lusztyk, J. T. Banks, P. Mulder and K. U.
Ingold, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 469–477.
19 D. V. Avila, C. E. Brown, K. U. Ingold and J. Lusztyk, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 466–470.
20 L. Valgimigli, K. U. Ingold and J. Lusztyk, J. Org. Chem., 1996,
61, 7947–7950.
21 V. Mugnaini and M. Lucarini, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 2725–2728.
Plots of log kH vs, solvent bH2 parameter for 11–14 were
linear with good correlation coefficients (Table 3), confirming
that KSEs on the reactions of peroxyl radicals with phenols (and
14) are dominated by H-bonding of the phenolic O–H to the
solvent. While it is gratifying that the slopes of these correlations
for 11–13 are indeed proportional to aH2 , they are larger than
expected from eqn (4) (ꢃ8.3a2H, see Table 3). Thus, there would
appear to be a slightly larger solvent dependence of peroxyl
radical reactions with phenols as compared to t-butoxyl radicals
or DPPHꢀ. While the reactivities of t-butoxyl radicals and
ꢄc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
1254 | Chem. Commun., 2008, 1252–1254