4) in 78 and 9% yields, respectively. Phenylpropiolate 2d
also reacts with 1a regioselectively to give the annulation
products 3d and 3d′ in 86 and 6% yields, respectively (entry
5). As shown in entries 4 and 5, both major products 3c and
3d of these two reactions have the phenyl substituent at the
C-3 position. The observations are surprising in view of the
very different polarity of the alkyne carbons where the phenyl
group is attached in 2c and 2d. The regiochemistry of
compound 3c was established by NOE experiments and of
3d was determined by comparing its spectral data with those
reported.6b
iodopiperonaldimine with 2a. The annulation gave the
expected product 3o in excellent yield, but a longer reaction
time of 3 h was required. To see whether the present
methodology can be applied to the preparation of pyridine
derivative. Aldimine 1d10 was treated with 2a under similar
reaction conditions affording the expected product 3q in 86%
yield (entry 18).
There are several intriguing features of the present nickel-
catalytic reaction. (i) Terminal alkynes and alkynes with a
TMS or alkyl group were all successfully used as substrates
for the annulation of 1a to give the corresponding isoquino-
line derivatives. This is in contrast with the previously
reported palladium-catalyzed reactions. In the latter, these
substrates first underwent Sonogashira-type alkynylation with
1a. The presence of CuI is necessary for further annulation
to give product 3. (ii) For alkynes without a strong electron-
withdrawing substituent including 2c,f,g,j,l-n, the regiose-
lectivity of alkyne insertion is similar to that reported for
the nickel-catalyzed carbocyclization of o-iodophenyl ketone
with these alkynes,11 but for alkynes with a strong electron-
withdrawing substituent such as a keto or ester group, the
regiochemistry is entirely different from that of the carbocy-
clization (see eq 1). (iii) For all of the present annulation
reactions, very high regioselectivity and fast reaction rates
were observed. For each of the present nickel-catalyzed
annulation, the regioselectivity is similar, but the reaction
rate is much faster (at least 20 times) compared to the
corresponding palladium-catalyzed reaction.
The observed regiochemistry of products 3c and 3d
prompted us to investigate the annulation of other unsym-
metrical phenyl-substituted alkynes 2e-g. Under the standard
reaction conditions, alkynes 2e and 2o, both with a keto
substituent, reacted smoothly with 1a in a highly regiose-
lective fashion to provide products 3e and 3p exclusively
with the regiochemistry similar to that of 3d. For phenyl-
substituted alkynes 2f,g, in which the phenyl group is slightly
more electron withdrawing than the hydroxymethyl substitu-
ent in 2f and the TMS group in 2g, the annulation of alkynes
2f,g gave highly regioselective products 3f,g (entries 6 and
7), respectively. Due to the presence of the bulkier TMS
substituent in 2g, the annulation of this alkyne with 1a
required a longer reaction time of 3 h. In addition, a minor
regioisomer 3g′ in 5% was also observed. These results
indicate that irrespective of the electron-withdrawing and
electron-donating group bonded to the phenylalkynl moiety,
the phenyl group in the major isoquinoline products is
generally attached to the carbon near to the nitrogen atom.
The scope and utility of this method was further extended
by the reaction with alkylalkynyl derivatives9 2h and 2i
consisting of a keto and ester group, respectively. For alkyne
2h, completely regioselective product 3h was isolated, but
for 2i, a mixture of products 3i and 3i′ in an 82:4 ratio was
found. Driven by curiosity, we treated 1,3-diyne 2j and 3,9-
diyne 2k with 1a under the standard reaction conditions. For
2j, only product 3j with the 1-hexynyl group attached to the
C-3 of the isoquinoline product was isolated. In the case of
2k, the reaction gave two regioisomers in ca. 1:1 ratio due
to the lack of major functionality difference of the two
substituents over the acetylene moiety. There was no further
annulation of the second alkyne group, even for 2k, where
the second alkyne group is at a distance of four carbons apart.
Encouraged by the above results, terminal alkynes were
tested for the present annulation reaction. Under the standard
catalytic conditions, phenylacetylene (2l) reacted successfully
with 1a to give the corresponding annulation product 3l in
excellent yields. In a similar manner, 1-hexyne (2m) and
5-cyanopentyne (2n) afforded isoquinoline derivatives 3m
and 3n in 76 and 84% yields, respectively. In all these cases,
the competitive Sonogashira reaction was efficiently sup-
pressed.5 Also, no cyclotrimerization of the alkyne or minor
regioisomer are observed. Again, the substitutents of the
terminal alkynes are all attached to the C-3 of isoquinolines.
Finally, we evaluated the reaction of electron rich o-
To account for the results of the present catalytic reaction,
we propose the mechanism shown in Scheme 1. The reaction
Scheme 1
likely starts with reduction of Ni(II) to Ni(0) by zinc powder.
The oxidative addition of 2-iodobenzaldimine to Ni(0) leads
to the formation of a five-membered-ring nickelacycle A.
Coordinative insertion of alkyne into the nickelacycle,
(10) Larock, R. C.; Doty, M. J.; Han, X. J. Org. Lett. 1999, 64, 8770.
(11) (a) Chang, K. J.; Rayabarapu, D. K.; Cheng, C. H. Org. Lett. 2003,
5, 3963. (b) Rayabarapu, D. K.; Cheng, C. H. Chem. Commun. 2002, 942.
(c) Rayabarapu, D. K.; Yang, C. H.; Cheng, C. H. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 17,
6726.
(9) (a) Bryndza, H. E.; Tam, W. Chem. ReV. 1988, 88, 1163. (b) Fryzuk,
M. D.; Montgomery, C. D. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1989, 95, 1.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 23, 2005
5181