C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
not migrate to the inner leaflet. To be effective, transporter 1 needs
to populate both sides of the bilayer membrane.
anionophores appended to the end of the sn-2 acyl chain. The
current design uses urea groups to bind and transport Cl-; however,
it should be possible to employ other molecular recognition units
to produce transporters that are selective for other anions, as well
as cations and neutral polar molecules. Mechanistic studies indicate
that the transporters operate by a new and distinct membrane relay
process. The expected favorable formulation properties of these
amphiphilic compounds (e.g., as liposomes, micelles, etc) should
facilitate efforts to transform them into tools for biomedical research
and perhaps as therapeutic agents.
The dependence of observed Cl- influx rate constants (kobs) on
transporter concentration was determined in two vesicle systems
with membranes of different compositions and thickness (i.e., 1,2-
dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC)/cholesterol (7:3) and the
thicker POPC/cholesterol (7:3)). In both cases, the curves were
nonlinear (Figure 2) indicating that transport is mediated by
kinetically active aggregates of 1. Furthermore, linear relationships
are obtained for the two membrane compositions when kobs is plotted
against [1]n, where n ) 2 and 4, respectively.14 Thus, the transporter
aggregate number is two for the DMPC/cholesterol membrane
which is consistent with the slightly overlapped tail-to-tail dimer
shown in Scheme 1. An aggregation of four in the thicker POPC/
cholesterol membrane suggests that a pair of transporters are in
each leaflet as shown in Scheme 2. An increased transporter
aggregation number in thicker membranes has been seen before
with self-assembled pore systems.15
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the NIH and
the University of Notre Dame.
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic procedures, transport
experiments, and data. This material is available free of charge via the
References
(1) (a) Stein, W. D. Channels, Carriers and Pumps, An Introduction to
Membrane Transport; Academic: San Diego, CA, 1990. (b) Smith, B. D.;
Lambert, T. N. Chem. Commun. 2003, 2261–2268.
(2) Recent reviews of synthetic transporters: (a) Gokel, G. W.; Carasel, I. A.
Chem. Soc. ReV. 2007, 36, 378–389. (b) Sakai, N.; Mareda, J.; Matile, S.
Mol. Biosyst. 2007, 10, 658–666. (c) Fyles, T. M. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2007,
36, 335–347. (d) McNally, B. A.; Leevy, W. M.; Smith, B. D. Supramol.
Chem. 2007, 19, 29–37. (e) Koert, U.; Al-Momani, L.; Pfeifer, J. R.
Synthesis 2004, 8, 112911–112946.
(3) Davis, A. P.; Sheppard, D. N.; Smith, B. D. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2007, 34,
8–357, and references therein.
(4) Ashcroft, F. M. Ion Channels and Disease; Academic Press: London, 2000.
(5) Notable exceptions are (a) the water soluble peptide transporters designed
by Tomich and coworkers. For a leading reference, see: Shank, L. P.;
Broughman, J. R.; Takeguchi, W.; Cook, G.; Robbins, A. S.; Hahn, L.;
Radke, G.; Iwamoto, T.; Schultz, B. D.; Tomich, J. M. Biophys. J. 2006,
90, 2138–2150. (b) The amphiphilic peptide transporters designed by Gokel
and coworkers. For a leading reference, see: Elliott, E. K.; Stine, K. J.;
Gokel, G. W. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 321, 43–50.
(6) For studies of relay transport processes in much thicker synthetic plasticized
membranes, see: (a) Riggs, J. A.; Smith, B. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 2765–2766. (b) White, K. M.; Duggan, P. J.; Sheahan, S. L.; Tyndall,
E. M.; Smith, B. D. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 194, 165–175.
Figure 2. Rate constants (kobs) for Cl- influx at different concentrations
of 1 in vesicles composed of DMPC/cholesterol (7:3) (9) and POPC/
cholesterol (7:3) (b), T ) 25 °C. Inset: linear relationships with [1]n, where
n ) 2 and 4, respectively.
(7) For membrane active phospholipids with simple acyl chain modifications,
see:(a) Menger, F. M.; Aikens, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1992, 31, 898–
900. (b) Menger, F. M.; Galloway, A. L.; Chlebowski, M. E.; Wu, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14034–14035.
Scheme 2. Relay Mechanism for Transporter Aggregate of Four
(8) It is well established that a modestly polar group appended to the end of
a phospholipid’s acyl chain undergoes substantially dynamic movement
between the lipophilic membrane interior and the polar membrane
surface. (a) Huster, D.; Mu¨ller, P.; Arnold, K.; Herrmann, A. Biophys. J.
2001, 80, 822–831. (b) Loura, L. M. S.; Ramalho, J. P. P. Biochim. Biophys.
Acta 2007, 1768, 467–478. (c) Menger, F. M.; Keiper, J. S.; Caran, K. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11842–11843.
(9) McNally, B. A.; Koulov, A. V.; Lambert, T. N.; Smith, B. D.; Joos, J.-B.;
Sisson, A. L.; Clare, J. P.; Sgarlata, V.; Judd, L. W.; Magro, G.; Davis,
A. P. Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14, 9599–9606.
The final mechanistic study with 1 measured Cl- influx rates as
a function of vesicle membrane thickness. Transport was monitored
in vesicles composed of phospholipids with increasing acyl chain
length, and thus increased membrane thickness.15,16 Figure S3
shows that increasing the acyl chain carbon number from 14 to 18
produced an incremental decrease in transport rate. Significantly,
when the acyl carbon number was increased to 20 and above there
was a dramatic drop to essentially zero transport. This membrane
thickness threshold effect is consistent with the relay mechanism
and not with the two alternatives.17 When the membrane is
relatively thin, the transporters can effectively relay Cl- across the
lipophilic core of the membrane as shown in Schemes 1 and 2.
Once the membrane is thicker than the tail-to-tail aggregate in
Scheme 2 (whose polar head groups are anchored to their respective
membrane interfaces), there is a gap between the urea groups in
each leaflet and the energetic barrier for Cl- relay becomes
prohibitively high.
(10) (a) Roseto, R.; Hajdu, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 2941–2944. (b)
Lampkins, A. J.; O’Neil, E. J.; Smith, B. D. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 6053–
6058.
(11) The Cl- association constant for N-(4-nitrophenyl)-N′-octyl urea in water
saturated chloroform is ∼8000 M-1 and ∼5000 M-1 for N-(4-tert-
butylphenyl)-N′-octyl urea as determined by the method in ref 9.
(12) McNally, B. A.; Koulov, A. V.; Smith, B. D.; Joos, J. B.; Davis, A. P.
Chem. Commun. 2005, 1087–1089.
(13) Koulov, A. V.; Lambert, T. N.; Shukla, R.; Jain, M.; Boon, J. M.; Smith,
B. D.; Li, H. Y.; Sheppard, D. N.; Joos, J. B.; Clare, J. P.; Davis, A. P.
Angew, Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4931–4933.
(14) Otto, S.; Osifchin, M.; Regen, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7276–
7277.
(15) DiGiogio, A. F.; Otto, S.; Bandyopadhyaya, P.; Regen, S. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 11029–11030.
(16) Lewis, B. A.; Engelman, D. M. J. Mol. Biol. 1983, 166, 211–217.
(17) Membrane thickness studies with a classic mobile carrier like valinomycin
report a moderate ten-fold decrease in transport rate as the acyl chain carbon
number is increased from 16 to 22 (Benz, R.; Frohlich, O.; La¨uger, P.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1977, 464, 465–481. With channel transport
processes there is a bell-shaped relationship with membrane thickness;
optimal transport is observed when the membrane thickness matches the
length of the channel structure: Weber, M. E.; Schlesinger, P. H.; Gokel,
G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 636–642.
In summary, we report a new class of synthetic membrane
transporters whose molecular structures are phospholipids with
JA8082363
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 51, 2008 17275