216
T. Su et al.
Letter
Synlett
Table 1 Screening Catalysts and Reaction Conditions for the Catalytic
to affect the reaction, a lower reaction temperature and
shorter reaction time induced the decrease of the yields
(Table 1, entries 17 and 18).
Three-Component Reactiona
I
N
catalyst, base
solvent
Further examination of this one-pot strategy’s substrate
scope under the optimized conditions revealed that the
strategy was widely applicable (Scheme 2). Expanding the
reaction to other 2-iodoanilines and aldehydes, different 2-
aryl-1,3-benzoselenazoles were obtained with moderated
to good yields. The yields of twelve products (3aa, 3ab, 3ac,
3ba, 3ca, 3da, 3ah, 3aj, 3al, 3an, 3aq, 3ar) were more than
60%. It is also indicated that steric hindrance of the substi-
tuted groups affects the reaction effectively. The para- and
meta-nitrobenzaldehyde reacted with aniline and selenium
to provide good yields of 3ab and 3ac (71% and 75% yields,
respectively), while no product was obtained from the reac-
tion of ortho-nitrobenzaldehyde under the same condi-
tions. The electronic effect is another important factor to
affect the reaction. Substituted 2-iodoanilines and alde-
hydes containing electron-withdrawing groups, such as ni-
tro and halogen, in aldehyde moiety seem favorable for the
yields (Scheme 2, 3ab, 3ac, 3aj, 3ai, 3al). On the contrary,
electron-donating groups on the aldehyde moiety gave rela-
tively lower yields (Scheme 2, 3ae–3ah, 3ak). Aromatic het-
erocyclic aldehydes, such as pyridinecarboxaldehydes 2n
and 2o, 2-thienaldehyde (2q), and 1-methylindole-2-car-
boxaldehyde (2r) were also suitable for the one-pot, three-
component reaction, which provide the corresponding
products in moderate to good yield (44–75%, 3an, 3ao, 3aq,
3ar).
O
Se
+
+
Se
NH2
1a
Entry
2a
3aa
Catalyst
–
Solvent
Base
Yield of 3aa
(%)b
1
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMF
KOH
–
2
CuCl2·2H2O
CuCl2·2H2Oc
CuSO4·5H2O
CuBr2
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
K2CO3
NaOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
–
3
–
4
–
5
–
6
CuI
53
52
41
59
36
72
68
27
61
67
–
7
CuIc
8
Cu(OAc)2
CuO
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17d
18e
Cu2O
Cu (powder)
Cu(OTf)2
Cu (powder)
Cu (powder)
Cu (powder)
Cu (powder)
Cu (powder)
Cu (powder)
toluene
DMSO
DMSO
65
61
To investigate the reaction mechanism, we have ex-
plored the possible reaction pathway and intermediates
(Scheme 3). First, 2-iodoaniline reacted with benzaldehyde
in the presence of selenium powder only to produce Schiff
base 4 in good yield without copper (Scheme 3,A). On the
other hand, the reaction of 2-iodoaniline with selenium
powder in presence of copper gave bis(2-aminophe-
nyl)diselenide28 (5) in good yield (82%, Scheme 3,B). The pu-
rified intermediate 5 reacted with benzaldehyde in DMSO
to provide the target product 3aa and intermediate 6
(Scheme 3,C), which proceeded well in the absence of cata-
lyst. To further explore the detailed reaction process, GC–
MS was used to detect the proposed intermediates for this
reaction. The intermediate 5 and 6 were detected when the
reaction proceeded for 6–12 hours (see the Supporting In-
formation), which were converted into the target com-
pound 3aa in the absence of catalyst (Scheme 3,D, 72%
yield) with the prolonged reaction time of 36 hours. Anoth-
er control experiment (Scheme 3,E) was also carried out to
investigate the role of the copper catalyst in the reaction D,
and the result revealed that the copper has no effect on the
reaction.
a Reaction conditions: 2-iodoaniline (0.5 mmol), benzaldehyde (0.6 mmol),
selenium powder (1.5 mmol), KOH (1.0 mmol), catalysts (0.05 mmol),
120 °C, 36 h, under insert gas atmosphere.
b Isolated yield.
c 1,10-Phenanthroline was added.
d At 100 °C.
e For 24 h.
screening we found that copper(I) iodide as the catalyst
provide 53% yield of the product 2-phenyl-1,3-ben-
zoselenazole. These result inspired us to devote more emo-
tion to other copper resources, and the results are
summarized in Table 1. Among the different copper cata-
lysts tested, copper powder (Table 1, entry 11, 72% yield)
gave the best result, which was superior to that of CuI,
Cu(OAc)2 (41%), CuO (59%), Cu2O (36%), and Cu(OTf)2 (68%).
1,10-Phenanthroline ligand was tested for acceleration of
the reaction, but the results indicated no significant yields
improvement (Table 1, entry 6 vs. 7). Base and solvent
screening revealed that KOH was optimal and DMSO was
the most suitable (Table 1, entries 13–16). Interesting,
when the solvent changed to toluene (Table 1, entry 16),
not any product was obtained. This result reminds us that
the redox reaction may takes place as DMSO possesses oxi-
dation. Reaction temperature and time were other factors
Based on our observations and previous literature,18,28–31
a plausible mechanism is outlined in Scheme 4 with the
generation of 3aa32 as the example.
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York — Synlett 2015, 26, 215–220