1332
S. Pramanik et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 71 (2008) 1327–1332
solvents and this is reflected in the absorption and emis-
sion properties of the probe in solvents of different polarity.
The compound is fluorescent with high fluorescence quantum
yield and considerable solvatochromism. The steady state emis-
sion spectra and relaxation dynamics have been found to be
influenced by the solute–solvent interaction. The non-radiative
decay constant for Pyz depends mainly on the hydrogen-bonding
interaction of the probe in the excited state with the solvent,
but the radiative decay constant is practically insensitive to
solvation.
Acknowledgements
Financial support from CSIR (01(2057)/06/EMR-II) is gratefully
acknowledged. One of the authors S.P. acknowledges CSIR and A.S.
acknowledges UGC for research fellowship.
References
[1] S.G. Roelfvan, C. Arnold, K. Wellnga, J. Agric. Food Chem. 84 (1979) 406.
[2] J.R. Goodell, F. Puig-Basagoiti, B.M. Forshey, P.-Y. Shi, D.M. Ferguson, J. Med.
Chem. 49 (2006) 2127.
[3] A. Singh, S. Rathod, B.N. Berad, S.D. Patil, A.G. Dosh, Orient. J. Chem. 16 (2000)
315.
Fig. 6. Plot of ln knr vs. ˛ (ꢀ) and ꢇ* (ꢁ).
[4] P.M. Borsenberger, L.B. Schein, J. Phys. Chem. 98 (1994) 233.
[5] X.H. Zhang, W.Y. Lai, S.K. Wu, Chem. Phys. Lett. 320 (2000) 77.
[6] D. Xiao, L. Xi, W. Yang, H. Fu, Z. Shuai, Y. Fang, J. Yao, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003)
6740.
[7] A.P. De Silva, H.Q.N. Gunaratne, T. Gunnlaugsson, A.J.M. Huxley, C.P. McCoy, J.T.
Rademacher, T.E. Rice, Chem. Rev. 97 (1997) 1515.
[8] E.A. Silinsh, Organic Molecular Crystals: Their Electronic States, Springer-
Verlag, Berlin, 1980.
[9] H.B. Fu, J.N. Yao, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) 1434.
[10] S.W. Oh, Y.S. Kang, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 257–258 (2005)
415.
[11] H.B. Fu, B.H. Loo, D.B. Xiao, R.M. Xie, X.H. Ji, J.N. Yao, B.W. Zhang, L.Q. Zhang,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41 (2002) 962.
[12] S.C. Burdette, G.K. Walkup, B. Spingler, R.Y. Tsien, S.J. Lippard, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
123 (2001) 7831.
[13] M.S. Nasir, C.J. Fahrni, D.A. Suhy, K.J. Kolodsick, C.P. Singer, T.V. O’Halloran, J.
Biol. Inorg. Chem. 4 (1999) 775.
[14] T. Hirano, K. Kikuchi, Y. Urano, T. Nagano, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002)
6555.
higher than in other solvents. For aprotic solvents, a plot of knr vs.
ET(30) shows a linear relationship with practically the same slope
as that observed for a plot of kr against ET(30). Such phenomenon
has also been observed by others with different probe [37]. For
protic solvents (EL, EG, GLY, H2O), specific hydrogen-bonding inter-
action occurring between the Pyz in the S1 state and protic solvent
molecules lead to an increase in the non-radiative relaxation rates
from S1 to S0. In ACN molecules, dipole–dipole interaction may
occur between the CN present at C(4) position of N-phenyl pyra-
zoline with ACN which leads to the lower quantum yield, kr and
higher knr values from those in other aprotic solvents. These results
demonstrate that having almost the same oscillator strength values
of Pyz in different solvents, the decrease in the fluorescence quan-
tum yield in protic solvents is primarily due to an increase in the
non-radiative decay process.
[15] K.R. Gee, Z.L. Zhou, D. Ton-That, S.L. Sensi, J.H. Weiss, Cell Calcium 31 (2002)
245.
interactions on the decay constant, knr the plot of ln knr vs.
the parameters ꢇ* and ˛ representing non-specific and specific
hydrogen-bonding solute–solvent interactions, respectively, has
been considered. ln knr is linearly correlated with ˛ and no cor-
relation with ꢇ* has been observed (Fig. 6). For water, the point
is off the line which may be due to the modification of water Pyz
hydrogen-bonding interaction on excitation as explained in earlier
section. Thus, one may conclude that specific hydrogen-bonding
interactions occurring between Pyz in the S1 state and protic sol-
vent molecules leads to an increase in the non-radiative relaxation
rates from S1 to S0. The importance of hydrogen-bonding interac-
tions in influencing the steady state fluorescence parameters and
dynamics of the excited state of different probes have also been
observed by other workers [31,38] using other probes.
[16] H. Gu¨ sten, G. Heinrich, Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 81 (1977) 810.
[17] D.E. Rivett, J. Rosevear, J.F.K. Wilshire, Aust. J. Chem. 36 (1983) 1649.
[18] C.J. Fahrni, L. Yang, D.G. VanDerveer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 3799.
[19] J.L. Bricks, A. Kovalchuk, C. Trieflinger, M. Nofz, M. Bu¨ sche, A.I. Tolmachev, J.
Daub, K. Rurack, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 13522.
[20] M. Jin, R. Lu, C.Y. Bao, T.H. Xu, Y.Y. Zhao, Opt. Mater. 26 (2004) 85.
[21] S. Chatterjee, P. Banerjee, S. Pramanik, A. Mukherjee, K.K. Mahalanabis, S.C.
Bhattacharya, Chem. Phys. Lett. 440 (2007) 313.
[22] A. Mukherjee, Ph.D. dissertation, Jadavpur University, 2006.
[23] I. Vogel, Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry, Singapore Publishers Ltd.,
fifth Edition, (1994) p. 397, 400–403.
[24] A. Mallick, B. Haldar, N. Chattopadhyay, J. Phys. Chem. B 109 (2005) 14683.
[25] A. Mallick, B. Haldar, N. Chattopadhyay, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 78
(2005) 215.
[26] A. Mallick, B. Haldar, S. Maiti, S.C. Bera, N. Chattopadhyay, J. Phys. Chem. B 109
(2005) 4675.
[27] D.M. Willard, R.E. Riter, N.E. Levinger, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998) 4151.
[28] D.M. Willard, R.E. Riter, N.E. Levinger, J. Phys. Chem. B 104 (2000) 11075.
[29] S. Saha, A. Samanta, J. Phys. Chem. A 106 (2002) 4763.
[30] P.K. Khatua, S. Chatterjee, S.C. Bhattacharya, J. Luminescence 121 (2006)
488.
[31] D. Banerjee, A.K. Laha, S. Bagchi, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 85 (1995)
153.
[32] D.V. O’Conner, D. Phillips, Time-correlated Single Photon Counting, Academic
Press, London, 1984, p. 181.
Hence, specific interactions induced by protic solvents seems
to induce an efficient vibronic coupling with the excited state of
Pyz reducing fluorescence quantum yield and increasing the rate
of non-radiative transition. Thus, a study of different properties
provides the same information regarding the local environment
around the probe in different solvents.
[33] A. Mielniczak, B. Wandelt, S. Wysocki, Mater. Sci. 20 (2002) 59.
[34] E.Z. Lippert, Z. Naturforsch. 10A (1955) 541.
[35] E.Z. Lippert, Z. Elektrochem. 61 (1957) 962.
[36] N. Mataga, Y. Kaifu, M. Koizumi, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 29 (1956) 465.
[37] D. Banerjee, S. Bagchi, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 101 (1996) 57.
[38] D. Banerjee, S. Bagchi, S. Mondal, S. Ghosh, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.
90 (1995) 171.
5. Conclusions
The newly synthesized pyrazoline compound shows a strong
tendency towards a hydrogen-bonding interaction with protic
[39] Y. Marcus, Chem. Soc. Rev. (1993) 409.