6 H. M. R. Hoffmann and J. Rabe, J. Org. Chem., 1985, 50, 3849.
7 H.-Y. Chen, L. N. Patkar, S.-H. Ueng, C.-C. Lin and A. S.-Y. Lee,
Synlett., 2005, 13, 2035.
8 D. Basavaiah, N. Kumaragurubaran, D. S. Sharada and R. M.
Reddy, Tetrahedron, 2001, 57, 8167.
9 (a) W. Ye, D. Leow, S. L. M. Goh, C.-T. Tan, C.-H. Chian and
C.-H. Tan, Tetrahedron Lett., 2006, 47, 1007; (b) B. M. Kim, S. M.
So and H. J. Choi, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 949.
Scheme 2 Approach of cyclopentadiene to 4c in the Diels–Alder
reaction.
10 (a) W. Ye, Z. Jiang, Y. Zhao, S. L. M. Goh, D. Leow, Y.-T. Soh and
C.-H. Tan, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2007, 349, 2454; (b) M. Agostinho
and Shu Kobayashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 2430; (c) G. Lalic
¯
and E. J. Corey, Tetrahedron Lett., 2008, 49, 4894.
11 A. L. Gernal and J.-L. Luche, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981, 103, 5454.
12 For Yb(OTf)3 catalysed Diels–Alder reactions, see: S. Kobayashi,
I. Hachiya, T. Takahori, M. Araki and H. Ishitani, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1992, 33, 6815.
13 J. H. Kim, H.-K. Kim, S. B. Jeon, K.-H. Son, E. H. Kim, S. K. Kang,
N.-D. Sung and B.-M. Kwon, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 6205.
14 We assigned the exo stereochemistry according to the following report:
R. R. Sauers and T. R. Henderson, J. Org. Chem., 1974, 39, 1850.
15 S. Cabrera, J. Aleman, P. Bolze, S. Bertelsen and K. A. Jørgensen,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 121.
as artemisolide,13 which is an inhibitor of IkB kinase b. It was
observed that the exo adduct14 8 is preferred, indicating second-
ary orbital interactions between the carbonyls of dithiomalonate
and the developing p bond of cyclopentadiene (Scheme 2).
The a,b-unsaturated moiety of the tandem CA-E product 4a
was suitably set up for conjugate addition reactions. Hetero-
Michael reactions using thiol15 or amine16 as the nucleophile
gave products with high diastereoselectivites (d.r. 4 20 : 1). An
a-methyl ketone 11 was generated with a moderate diastereo-
meric ratio (4 : 1) via a palladium catalysed hydrogenation.17
Conjugate addition reaction with Gilman’s reagent18 provided
adduct 12 with excellent diastereomeric ratio (420 : 1). The
relative and absolute stereochemistry of products 7–12 were
assigned by 1H NMR spectrum19 and comparision with literature
values.20 The assignment was further confirmed by single crystal
X-ray analyses of compounds 8, 11 and 12. (see ref. 23 and ESIz).
We are keenly aware that the key weakness in this methodolgy
is the high amount of CPS required, albeit that they were
recoverable. Studies are on-going to make this reaction even more
synthetically useful. The replacement of Br in the allylic bromides
by CPS to form an ammonium salt21 is a fairly rapid reaction.
However, CPS is a weak base which is not effective in promoting
the conjugate addition of the 1,3-dicarbonyl donors. The use of
stronger organic bases such as TBD22 as additives may promote
the reaction and allow a catalytic amount of CPS to be used. We
have also prepared a polystyrene-supported chiral pyrrolidinyl
sulfonamide (PS-CPS) from chiral diamine and polystyrene-
bonded sulfonyl chloride. We will determine the effectiveness of
this approach to improve the ease of recovery of the CPS.
16 No catalyst is required for the aza-Michael reaction. The reaction
was carried out by mixing 4a and pyrazole in CH2Cl2 at room
temperature (see ESIz).
17 D. A. Evans and C. L. Sims, Tetrahedron Lett., 1973, 47, 4691. Ethyl
acetate was found to provide product with highest diastereoselectivity.
18 E. Nakamura, S. Matsuzawa, Y. Horiguchi and I. Kuwajima,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1986, 27, 4029.
19 The coupling constant of adjacent protons Ha and Hb was determined
to be 3J = 10.1 Hz, which indicates a trans geometry according to the
following report: M. I. Donnoli, P. Scafato, M. Nardiello, D.
Casarini, E. Giorgio and C. Rosini, Tetrahedron, 2004, 60, 4975
20 T. Perrard, J.-C. Plaquevent, J.-R. Desmurs and D. Hebrault, Org.
.
Lett., 2000, 2, 2959.
21 The structure of the ammonium salt was determined by single
crystal X-ray analyses (see ESIz) as follows:
In conclusion, we have developed a tandem conjugate
addition–elimination reaction between activated allylic bro-
mide and various 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds. The reaction
was promoted by CPS which were easily prepared from their
corresponding amino alcohols. Stereoselective synthesis of
several enantiomerically pure compounds were also presented.
We are grateful for financial supports (R-143-000-337-112)
and a scholarship (to J. Xu) from National University of
Singapore. We also thank the Medicinal Chemistry Program
for their financial support. We also thank Ms Tan Geok Kheng
and Dr Koh Lip Lin for their assistance with the X-ray analyses.
.
22 W. Ye, J. Xu, C.-T. Tan and C.-H. Tan, Tetrahedron Lett., 2005,
46, 6875.
23 Crystal data for compounds 8, 11, 12 and ref. 21, CCDC reference
numbers 692929–692932. Crystal data of 8: C34H44O3S2, M =
564.81, monoclinic, a = 18.7796(12), b = 13.0947(8),
c =
11.9738(7) A3, b = 94.651(2)1, T = 296(2) K, space group P2(1)/
c, Z = 4, 19592 refelctions measured, 6730 unique (Rint = 0.0577).
R1 = 0.0666. The final wR(F2) was 0.1418. Crystal data of 11:
C17H28O3S2, M = 344.51, triclinic, a = 9.7296(18), b = 11.309(2),
c = 11.780(2) A3, a = 65.152(4)1, b = 68.166(4)1, g = 64.564(4)1.
T = 295(2) K, space group P1, Z = 2, 11759 refelctions measured,
7994 unique (Rint = 0.0335). R1 = 0.0860. The final wR(F2) was
0.1925. Flack parameter was 0.17(11). Crystal data of 12:
C21H36O3S2, M = 400.62, monoclinic, a = 18.8390(19), b =
12.6378(14), c = 10.2009(10) A3, b = 95.756(3)1. T = 223(2) K,
space group Cc, Z = 4, 8 416 refelctions measured, 4012 unique
(Rint = 0.0523). R1 = 0.0595. The final wR(F2) was 0.1237. Crystal
data of ref. 21: C26H41BrCl2N2O3S, M = 612.48, orthorhombic,
a = 8.1010(7), b = 12.7221(10), c = 28.619(2) A3, T = 223(2) K,
space group P2(1)2(1)2(1), Z = 4, 20732 refelctions measured, 6762
unique (Rint = 0.0662). R1 = 0.0579. The final wR(F2) was 0.1430.
Flack parameter was 0.008(11).
Notes and references
1 (a) R. Tamura, K.-i. Watabe, N. Ono and Y. Yamamoto, J. Org.
Chem., 1992, 57, 4895; (b) K. Fuji, M. Node, H. Nagasawa, Y.
Naniwa, T. Taga, K. Machida and G. Snatzke, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1989, 111, 7921.
2 J. N. Kim, H. J. Lee and J. H. Gong, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 9141.
3 Y. Du, X. Han and X. Lu, Tetrahedron Lett., 2004, 45, 4967.
4 C.-W. Cho, J.-R. Kong and M. J. Krische, Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 1337.
5 P. V. Ramachandran, S. Madhi, L. Bland-Berry, M. V. R. Reddy
and M. J. O’Donnell, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 13450.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
5528 | Chem. Commun., 2008, 5526–5528