9364 Chai et al.
Asian J. Chem.
TABLE-3
UV-VISIBLE SPECTRA DATA OF H2LAND ITS TRANSITION METAL COMPLEXES
First band
ε1 (× 104 L mol-1 cm-1)
Second band
C (× 10-4 mol L-1)
Compound
λmax1 (nm)
267
λmax2 (nm)
313
ε2 (× 104 L mol-1 cm-1)
H2L
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.29
1.04
1.12
0.89
1.09
1.19
0.59
0.40
0.68
0.70
269
300
[CuL]⋅0.5CH3CH2OH
[NiL]⋅CH3CH2OH
[CoL]⋅CH3CH2OH
[MnL]⋅CH3CH2OH
280
289
279
292
275
288
coordinated to the metals. In the 1572-1440 cm-1 region, the
observed bands were attributed to aromatic C=C vibrations.
In addition, infrared spectra of the complexes show the
expected strong absorption bands due to ν(O-H) at 3439-3421
cm-1, which are the evidence for the existence of ethanol
molecules1e.
UV-visible spectra of H2L and complexes: The UV-
visible spectra of H2L and its corresponding complexes in
diluted DMF solution are presented in Table-3. The spectra of
the complexes are similar to each other, but are different from
the spectrum of the ligand H2L. The UV-visible spectrum of
the free ligand H2L exhibits two absorption peaks at 267 and
313 nm. The former absorption peak at 267 nm can be
assigned to the π-π* transition of the benzene rings, while the
latter one at 313 nm can be attributed to the intra-ligand π-π*
transition of the C=N bonds10.
Compared with the absorption peak of the free ligand,
the former absorption peaks at 269, 280, 279 and 275 nm are
observed in Cu(II), Ni(II), Co(II) and Mn(II) complexes,
respectively, which are bathochromically shifted by 2-13 nm.
Meanwhile, the second absorption peaks at 300, 289, 292 and
288 nm are observed in Cu(II), Ni(II), Co(II) and Mn(II)
complexes, respectively, which are hypsochromically shifted
by 13-25 nm. These indicate that the oxime nitrogen atom is
involved in coordination to the metal atom11,12.In addition, the
new band observed at 362 nm for the Cu(II) complex is
assigned to the n-π* charge transfer transition from the filled
pπ orbital of the bridging phenolic oxygen to the vacant d-
orbital of the Cu(II) ion, which is characteristic of the transi-
tion metal complexes with N2O2 coordination spheres13.
Thermal properties: The thermal decomposition proce-
sses of the complexes compared with the ligand are signifi-
cantly different. The ligand has a sharp endothermic peak at
83 ºC in the DTA curve, with no weight loss in the TG curve
and has a exothermic peak at 266 ºC, weight loss occurs at
239 ºC in the corresponding TG curve. The ligand decomposed
completely by one step. However, the DTA curves of all the
complexes have endothermic peaks in the range 78-142 ºC,
with weight loss in the TG curve. The weight loss values of
Cu(II), Ni(II), Co(II) and Mn(II) complexes are 5.6, 11.5, 10.7
and 11.8 %, respectively, which are close to the theoretical
values (5.8, 11.1, 11.0 and 11.2 %) of losing corresponding
ethanol molecule. The complexes have no sharp melting point.
All of the complexes have two exothermic peaks at 300 ºC,
with apparent weight loss, which are staged oxidative decom-
position of the complexes. On further heating, the final solid
products are likely to CuO, NiO, CoO and Mn2O3 with a
residual value of 19.3, 17.2, 17.0 and 18.5 %, which was found
to be close to the calculated values (19.9, 17.9, 17.9 and 19.1 %)
when the temperature is above 800 ºC.
REFERENCES
1. (a) W.K. Dong, Y.X. Sun, C.Y. Zhao, X.Y. Dong and L. Xu, Polyhedron,
29, 2087 (2010); (b) W.K. Dong, Y.X. Sun, G.H. Liu, L. Li, X.Y. Dong
and X.H. Gao, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 638, 1370 (2012); (c) W.K. Dong,
X.N. He, H.B. Yan, Z.W. Lv, X. Chen, C.Y. Zhao and X.L. Tang, Poly-
hedron, 28, 1419 (2009); (d) W.K. Dong, Y.X. Sun, Y.P. Zhang, L. Li,
X.N. He and X.L. Tang, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 362, 117 (2009); (e) W.K.
Dong, L. Li, C.F. Li, L. Xu and J.G. Duan. Spectrochim. Acta A, 71,
650 (2008); (f) W.K. Dong, J.Y. Shi, L. Xu, J.K. Zhong, J.G. Duan and
Y.P. Zhang, Appl. Organometal. Chem., 22, 89 (2008).
2. P.G. Lacroix, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 339 (2001).
3. S.S. Sun, C.L. Stern, S.T. Nguyen and J.T. Hupp, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
126, 6314 (2004).
4. D. Ülkü, F. Ercan, O. Atakol and F.N. Dinçer, Acta Crystallogr., C53,
1056 (1997).
5. J. Kim, B. Chen, T.M. Reineke, H. Li, M. Eddaoudi, D.B. Moler, M.
O’Keeffe and O.-M. Yaghi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 123, 8239 (2001).
6. S. Durmus, B.M. Ates, O. Atakol and F. Ercan, Z. Kristallogr., 220,
973 (2005).
7. J. Reglinski, S. Morris and D.E. Stevenson, Polyhedron, 21, 2167
(2002).
8. K. Ueno and A.E. Martel, J. Phys. Chem., 60, 1270 (1956).
9. W.J. Geary, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1, 81 (1971).
10. T. Ghosh, B. Mondal, T. Ghosh, M. Sutradhar, G. Mukherjee and
M.G.B. Drew, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 360, 1753 (2007).
11. H.E. Smith, Chem. Rev., 83, 359 (1983).
12. S. Akine, T. Taniguchi and T. Nabeshima, Chem. Lett., 30, 682 (2001).
13. L. Gomes, E. Pereira and B. Castro, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans., 1373
(2000).