Table 3 Transformation of compound 4a to 3a under various
conditionsa
occurred. However, using DBU and NaH (in THF) as the bases,
4a decomposed entirely within 2 h (Table 3, entries 4 and 5).
In conclusion, our efforts to extend the scope and limita-
tions of phosphine-catalyzed Morita–Baylis–Hillman reac-
tions have led us to the unexpected discovery of a novel
route for the synthesis of polysubstituted oxoimidazolidine
derivatives. This method is a potentially powerful synthetic
protocol for construction of the oxoimidazolidine ring from
simple and easily available starting materials. Our future
efforts will focus on applying them to the construction of
other biologically significant natural products.
Yield (%)b
3a
Entry
Base
t/h
1
2
3
4
5
a
PPh2Me–MVK
K2CO3
5
24
2
2
2
499
20
No reaction
Dec.
Dec.
DABCO
DBU
NaHc
We thank the Shanghai Municipal Committee of Science
and Technology (04JC14083, 06XD14005), and the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (20672127 and
20732008) for financial support.
b
See ESIw for a detailed experimental procedure. Isolated yields.
THF was used as a solvent.
c
Therefore, in the reaction system, there is an equilibrium between
imine, ethyl glyoxalate, and aniline. This phenomenon can also be
identified in the previous literature, where those imines bearing
electron-withdrawing groups on the benzene rings are difficult to
purify and products are usually obtained as mixtures of these three
components.6 At first, the more nucleophilic phosphine Lewis base
PPh2Me undergoes a nucleophilic attack at the carbonyl group in
the a-imino ester to produce intermediate A.7 Then epoxy inter-
mediate B is formed by the nucleophilic attack of the CQN
double bond with the oxonium anion. Free aniline acts as a
nucleophile to attack the epoxide in intermediate B, affording
intermediate C and regenerating phosphine PPh2Me. Intermediate
C undergoes subsequent intramolecular proton transfer to give
intermediate 5, which acts as a nucleophile to attack intermediate
B again, providing intermediate D, which furnishes compound 4
via similar intramolecular proton transfer. In this reaction system,
there is a phosphine catalytic cycle to generate MVK dimer. The
first step of this cycle involves the Michael-type nucleophilic
addition of the tertiary phosphine to the activated alkene
(MVK) to produce zwitterionic intermediate F, which adds to
another molecule of MVK to afford zwitterionic intermediate G.
Subsequent proton migration gives zwitterionic intermediate H.
Release of the catalyst provides the MVK dimer (Scheme 2). In the
phosphine catalytic cycle, the zwitterionic intermediates F, G, and
H can act as a base to snatch a proton from 4, providing anionic
intermediate E. Subsequent intramolecular nucleophilic attack
onto the ester carbonyl group produces the desired product 3.
Using the more nucleophilic phosphine PPh2Me can afford
zwitterionic intermediates F, G and H in higher concentration,
which quickly abstract a proton from compound 4 to produce the
final product. In the presence of PPh3, intermediate F is produced
in lower concentration, which only acts as an enolate to react with
imine 1, affording the normal MBH adduct 2. This proposed
mechanism could clearly explain why 3 cannot be produced either
in the absence of MVK or using PPh3 as a catalyst.
Notes and references
1 (a) K. Willi, H. Erwin, I. Heinz, S. Wolfgang and H. Silvin, Chem.
Ber., 1982, 115, 1721–1732; (b) Z. Giancarlo and P. Francesco,
J. Heterocycl. Chem., 1981, 18, 1629–1633; (c) R. Alan, C. Dai, P.
Leeming, I. Ghiviriga, C. M. Hartshorn and P. J. Steel,
J. Heterocycl. Chem., 1996, 33, 1935–1942; (d) B. Hadj, T.
Fernand, G. Pierre, M. Jacques and C. Robert, Tetrahedron,
1978, 34, 1153–1161; (e) S. P. Christof and S. Dieter, Liebigs
Ann. Chem., 1991, 7, 655–668; (f) S. Basra, M. W. Fennie and
M. C. Kozlowski, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 2659–2662.
2 Selected articles and reviews on the MBH reaction: (a) K. Morita,
Z. Suzuki and H. Hirose, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1968, 41, 2815–2819
(using phosphine as a catalyst); (b) A. B. Baylis, M. E. D. Hillman,
Ger. Offen., 1972, 2 155 113A. B. Baylis and M. E. D. Hillman,
Chem. Abstr., 1972, 77, 34174M. E. D. Hillman, A. B. Baylis, U. S.
Patent, 1973, 3 743 669 (using amine as a catalyst); (c) S. E. Drewes
and G. H. P. Roo, Tetrahedron, 1988, 44, 4653–4670; (d) D.
Basavaiah, P. D. Rao and R. S. Hyma, Tetrahedron, 1996, 52,
8001–8062; (e) E. Ciganek, Org. React. (N. Y.), 1997, 51, 201–350;
(f) P. Langer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 3049–3052; (g) D.
Basavaiah, A. J. Rao and T. Satyanarayana, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103,
811–892. Selected papers on the aza-MBH reaction: ; (h) M. Shi and
Y.-M. Xu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 4507–4510; (i) M. Shi
and L. H. Chen, Chem. Commun., 2003, 1310–1311; (j) D. Balan and
H. Adolfsson, Tetrahedron Lett., 2003, 44, 2521–2524; (k) K. Matsui,
S. Takizawa and H. Sasai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 3680–3681;
(l) M. Shi, L.-H. Chen and C.-Q. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127,
3790–3800, and references cited therein; (m) M. Shi, Y.-M. Xu and
Y.-L. Shi, Chem.–Eur. J., 2005, 11, 1794–1802; (n) J. E. Imbriglio, M.
M. Vasbinder and S. J. Miller, Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 3741–3743; (o) S.
J. Miller, Acc. Chem. Res., 2004, 37, 601–610; (p) V. K. Aggarwal, D.
K. Dean, A. Mereu and R. Williams, J. Org. Chem., 2002, 67,
510–514; (q) V. K. Aggarwal, I. Emme and S. Y. Fulford, J. Org.
Chem., 2003, 68, 692–700; (r) V. K. Aggarwal, S. Y. Fulford and G.
C. Lloyd-Jones, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 1706–1708;
(s) Y.-L. Shi and M. Shi, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2007, 349, 2129–2135.
3 J. Gao, G.-N. Ma, Q.-J. Li and M. Shi, Tetrahedron Lett., 2006, 47,
7685–7688.
4 M. Shi, G.-N. Ma and J. Gao, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 9779–9781.
5 (a) A. Palmelund, E. L. Myers, L. R. Tai, S. Tisserand, C. P. Butts
and V. K. Aggarwal, Chem. Commun., 2007, 4128–4130; (b) M. Shi
and Y.-M. Xu, Chem. Commun., 2001, 1876–1877; (c) M. Shi and
Y.-M. Xu, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2002, 696–701; (d) M. Shi,
Y.-M. Xu, G.-L. Zhao and X.-F. Wu, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2002,
3666–3679; (e) X. Zhu, J. Lan and O. Kwon, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2003, 125, 4716–4717; (f) Y. S. Tran and O. Kwon, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2007, 129, 12632–12633.
6 For the preparation of ethyl (arylimino)acetates 1, see: E.
Borrione, M. Prato, G. Scorrano and M. Stivanello, J. Heterocycl.
Chem., 1988, 25, 1831–1836.
7 For the example of PPh2Me used as a nucleophile to attack the
carbonyl group, see: R. Appel and M. Montenarh, Chem. Ber.,
1977, 110, 2368–2373.
To prove that the noncyclic product 4 is an important
intermediate for the construction of cyclic product 3, several
control experiments were carried out on the transformation of
4a to 3a and the results are shown in Table 3. Using
PPh2Me–MVK as a base, this reaction proceeded smoothly to
afford 3a in quantitative yield after 5 h (Table 3, entry 1). Other
bases were also evaluated. K2CO3 gave 3a in 20% yield after
24 h (Table 3, entry 2). Using DABCO as a base, no reaction
ꢁc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
5000 | Chem. Commun., 2008, 4998–5000