B
C. Morozzi et al.
Letter
Synlett
has been investigated for its ability to break a chemical
bond between carbon or a heteroatom and silicon and to
promote the formation of silyl enol ethers, but the reaction
in the presence of Amb-F gave a poor yield, probably be-
cause the catalyst promoted both the silylation and desil-
ylation processes (Table 1, entry 2). Polystyrene-bound 4-
(dimethylamino)pyridine (PS-DMAP), polystyrene-bound
1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene (PS-TBD), and polysty-
rene-bound 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane hydrochloride
(PS-DABCO) as catalysts showed moderate abilities to form
the product 3 (Table 1, entries 3–5). However, the yield of
the silyl enol ethers was increased by using polystyrene-
bound 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (PS-DBU) as a
catalyst (Table 1, entry 6), but increasing the amount of cat-
alyst from 5 mol% to 10 mol% produced a decreased prod-
uct yield (Table 1, entry 7). The best result was obtained by
using 10 mol% of polystyrene-bound 2–tert–butylimino–
2–diethylamino–1,3–dimethylperhydro-1,3,2-diazaphos-
phorine (PS-BEMP), which gave the expected product in
78% yield (Table 1, entry 9).
Table 2 Comparison of the PS-BEMP-Catalyzed Silylation Reaction of 1
with Various Silylating Agents
Entry
1
Silylating agent
Yield (%) of 3
Si
Si
78
O
N
N
2
O
2
3
Si
24
–
4
O
Si
F3C
N
5
a Determined by 1H NMR analysis.
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, namely
PS-BEMP (10 mol%) at 60 °C, the scope of a range of aromat-
ic ketones was investigated (Table 3). Depending on the
starting material, the silylating process gave very good to
excellent yields. For instance, ketones substituted with an
electron-donating group on the aromatic moiety, such as 4-
methylacetophenone (6a) or 3-methoxyacetophenone (6b),
were less reactive, but nevertheless gave the desired prod-
ucts in good yields (Table 3, entries 1 and 2). Excellent re-
sults were obtained when the reactions were carried out
with aromatic ketones 6c–e bearing electron-withdrawing
groups (Table 3, entries 3–5). Moreover, heteroaromatic
ketones 6f and 6g were smoothly converted into the corre-
sponding silyl enol ethers (Table 3, entries 6 and 7).
Table 1 Screening of Various Supported Bases in the Formation of a
Silyl Enol Ether from Acetophenone (1)
Si
O
O
cat.
Si
Si
+
O
N
60 °C, 5 h
SolFC
1
2
3
Entry
Catalyst (mol%)
Yielda of 3 (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
–
trace
26
Furthermore, the indanones 6h and 6i smoothly gave
the desired products (Table 3, entries 8 and 9). We further
extended this methodology to α-substituted ketones under
the optimal reaction conditions, but with the amount of cat-
alyst reduced from 10 mol% to 5 mol%. The reaction was
completely stereoselective, leading to the formation of the Z-
stereoisomers exclusively. Silyl enol ethers were formed
quantitatively when ketones 6j and 6k were employed as
substrates (Table 3, entries 10 and 11), and an excellent yield
(85%) was obtained when ketone 6l was employed (Table 3,
entry 12). The use of propiophenone (6m) as a starting ma-
terial gave very good results in terms of both the yield (70%)
and the stereoselectivity, as only the Z-isomer was detected
(Table 3, entry 13). Also the feasibility of using the protocol
on sulfone 6n and enone 6o was also tested, and very good
results were obtained (Table 3, entries 14 and 15).
A further investigation was performed to extend the
scope of the work to include aliphatic ketones and alde-
hydes (Table 4), which showed similar reactivities to the ke-
tones previously discussed. In particular, cyclohexanone
(6p) gave the corresponding silylated ketone 7p after three
hours in 84% yield (Table 4, entry 1). A very good yield of
the silyl enol ether (88%) was obtained from 4-methylcyclo-
hexanone (6q) after 12 hours (Table 4, entry 2). A lower
Amb-F (5)
PS-DMAP (5)
PS-TBD (5)
PS-DABCO (5)
PS-DBU (5)
PS-DBU (10)
PS-BEMP (5)
PS-BEMP (10)
49
41
57
68
52
55
78
a As determined by 1H NMR analysis.
Other silylating agents were examined to verify
whether BSA (2) was the best choice of silylating agent for
the case study. The PS-BEMP-catalyzed silylation reaction
of 1 to yield 3 was therefore also performed by using N-
methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)acetamide (MTSA, 4) and N-[tert-
butyl(dimethyl)silyl]-2,2,2-trifluoroacetamide (MTBSTFA,
5), as summarized in Table 2. Reactant 4 gave a lower yield
compared with 2, and the bulkier 5 was ineffective, the un-
reacted ketone 1 being recovered after five hours at 60 °C.
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York — Synlett 2017, 28, A–E