(Rint = 0.0745). Final GooF = 0.946, R1 = 0.0690, wR2 = 0.1800
(with I 4 2s(I)).
1 (a) Organic Electronics, ed. H. Klauk, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
Germany, 2006; (b) Functional Organic Materials, ed. T. J. J.
Muller and U. H. F. Bunz, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2007; (c) M.
¨
Gholami and R. R. Tykwinski, Chem. Rev., 2006, 106, 4997.
2 F. Galbrecht, T. W. Bunnagel, A. Bilge, U. Scherf and T. Farrell,
¨
Bunz, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2007, pp. 83–118.
¨
in Functional Organic Materials, ed. T. J. J. Muller and U. H. F.
3 For conceptually related ‘‘H-shaped’’ 2-D conjugation, see: N.
Zhou, L. Wang, D. W. Thompson and Y. Zhao, Org. Lett., 2008,
10, 3001.
4 (a) J. A. Marsden, J. J. Miller, L. D. Shirtcliff and M. M. Haley, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 2464; (b) C.-H. Zhao, A. Wakamiya,
Y. Inukai and S. Yamaguchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 15934.
5 (a) J. N. Wilson and U. H. F. Bunz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127,
4124; (b) A. J. Zucchero, J. N. Wilson and U. H. F. Bunz, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 11872; (c) S. M. Brombosz, A. J. Zucchero,
R. L. Phillips, D. Vazquez, A. Wilson and U. H. F. Bunz, Org.
Lett., 2007, 9, 4519; (d) E. L. Spitler, L. D. Shirtcliff and M. M.
Haley, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 86; (e) P. L. McGrier, K. M.
Solntsev, J. Schonhaber, S. M. Brombosz, L. M. Tolbert and U. H.
¨
F. Bunz, Chem. Commun., 2007, 2127.
6 E. Opsitnick and D. Lee, Chem.–Eur. J., 2007, 13, 7040.
7 C. Kaes, A. Katz and M. W. Hosseini, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100,
3553.
8 (a) A. Ajayaghosh, P. Carol and S. Sreejith, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2005, 127, 14962; (b) A. E. Dennis and R. C. Smith, Chem.
Commun., 2007, 4641.
9 (a) B. Wang and M. R. Wasielewski, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119,
12; (b) A. Kokil, P. Yao and C. Weder, Macromolecules, 2005, 38,
3800; (c) L. Tian, W. Zhang, B. Yang, P. Lu, M. Zhang, D. Lu, Y.
Ma and J. Shen, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 6944.
10 (a) D. Zhao and J. S. Moore, Chem. Commun., 2003, 807; (b) S.
Fig. 5 Fluorescence response of 4 (0.5 mM) toward various transi-
tion-metal ions (2.5 mM) in MeCN. The response was quantified by the
ratio (I ꢀ I0)/I0, in which I0 and I denote the emission intensity at
l = 500 nm prior to and after addition of the metal ion, respectively;
lexc = 320 nm; T = 293 K.
(Fig. 4(a)). The ratio of I500/I390 with excitation at 320 nm
varied from 0.1 in the absence of Zn2+ to 25 upon treatment of
5 equiv. Zn2+ (2.5 mM), a 250-fold emission ratio increase.
Under similar conditions, the half-ligand model 9 showed only
slight decrease in the intensity of the l = 370 nm peak with no
development of longer wavelength features (Fig. 4(b)). On the
other hand, the bipy ligand fragment model 6 showed a simple
fluorescence turn-on behavior toward Zn2+ (Fig. S6, ESIw).
The significant enhancement and red-shift in the emission of 4
now enables ratiometric detection, which is advantageous over
conventional measurement at a single wavelength.8,16–20
The high affinity of 4 toward group 12 metal ions prompted
the investigation of its response profile across a wider range of
transition-metal ions. As summarized in Fig. 5, a MeCN
solution of 4 (0.5 mM) displayed strong turn-on fluorescence
response toward mM-level concentrations of Zn2+, Cd2+ and
Hg2+ as monitored by changes in the emission intensity. On
the other hand, other closed-shell ions such as Ag+ or Cu+, or
paramagnetic Cu2+, Fe2+, Mn2+, Co2+ or Ni2+ elicited
either complete quenching or negligible changes.21
Hoger, Chem.–Eur. J., 2004, 10, 1320.
¨
2362; (b) O. Henze, D. Lentz, A. Schafer, P. Franke and A. D.
¨
11 (a) O. Henze, D. Lentz and A. D. Schluter, Chem.–Eur. J., 2000, 6,
¨
Schluter, Chem.–Eur. J., 2002, 8, 357; (c) D. M. Opris, P. Franke
¨
and A. D. Schluter, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2005, 822; (d) D. M. Opris,
¨
A. Ossenbach, D. Lentz and A. D. Schluter, Org. Lett., 2008, 10,
¨
2091.
12 P. N. W. Baxter, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 4170.
13 (a) J. Nitschke and T. D. Tilley, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 3673;
(b) J. R. Nitschke, S. Zurcher and T. D. Tilley, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
¨
2000, 122, 10345; (c) J. R. Nitschke and T. D. Tilley, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 2142.
14 Coordination-induced spectral changes have previously been
reported for 2 but no information is available for its binding
stoichiometry, affinity, or the structure of putative metal
In summary, a new dynamic fluorophore was prepared, in
which swivelling motions around a rigid p-conjugated axle was
exploited to enforce two metal binding units to converge at the
metal center as a tight bischelator. A high affinity binding with
Ka up to B107 Mꢀ1 and ratiometric fluorescence response
toward selected metal ions promise potential application of
this and related ligand platforms for biological and environ-
mental sensing.20,22–24 Efforts are currently underway in order
to improve the selectivity, sensitivity, and solubility of this
first-generation prototype in aqueous environments.
complexes12
.
15 A pyrene-appended all-carbon analogue of
4 was recently
reported. See: S. Sankararaman, G. Venkataramana and B.
Varghese, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 2404.
16 M. M. Henary, Y. Wu and C. J. Fahrni, Chem.–Eur. J., 2004, 10,
3015.
17 M. Taki, J. L. Wolford and T. V. O’Halloran, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2004, 126, 712.
18 C. J. Chang, J. Jaworski, E. M. Nolan, M. Sheng and S. J.
Lippard, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2004, 101, 1129.
19 E. M. Nolan and S. J. Lippard, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 5910.
20 D. W. Domaille, E. L. Que and C. J. Chang, Nat. Chem. Biol.,
2008, 4, 168.
This work was supported by the National Science Founda-
tion (CAREER CHE 0547251) and the US Army Research
Office (W911NF-07-1-0533). This paper is dedicated to Pro-
fessor Myunghyun Paik Suh on the occasion of her 60th
birthday.
21 Fluorescence quenching by paramagnetic or heavy metal ions has
typically been ascribed to the effect of strong spin–orbit coupling.
Closed-shell metal ions suffer less from such deleterious pathways
and (with appropriate metal–fluorophore combinations) can give
rise to enhanced emission through the inversion of the np*–pp*
ligand excited states22
.
Notes and references
22 A. P. de Silva, H. Q. N. Gunaratne, T. Gunnlaugsson, A. J. M.
Huxley, C. P. McCoy, J. T. Rademacher and T. E. Rice, Chem.
Rev., 1997, 97, 1515.
23 S. W. Thomas III, G. D. Joly and T. M. Swager, Chem. Rev., 2007,
107, 1339.
24 J. S. Kim and D. T. Quang, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 3780.
z Crystal data for [Zn(4)(OTf)2]: C50H38F6N4O6S2Zn, M = 1034.33,
monoclinic, space group C2/c, a = 59.348(3), b = 9.9017(6),
c
= 19.2658(12) A, b = 102.291(2)1, V =
11062.0(11) A3,
T = 150(2) K, Z = 8, 35 934 reflections measured, 9700 unique
ꢁc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
6030 | Chem. Commun., 2008, 6028–6030