32 Journal of Natural Products, 2009, Vol. 72, No. 1
Tripathi et al.
used for detection in API-ES (positive mode). The retention times and
ESIMS product ions (tR in min, m/z [M + H]+) of the L-FDAA
monoderivatized amino acids in the hydrolysate of the first portion were
observed to be Pro (34.9, 366.8), Val (43.0, 368.8), and N-Me-Val (48.4,
382.9), while the reaction with racemic DL-FDAA in the second portion
gave rise to two peaks for each corresponding amino acid moiety. The
retention times and ESIMS product ions (tR1/tR2, min, m/z [M + H]+)
were observed to be Pro (34.9/37.2, 366.8), Val (43.0/49.9, 368.8),
and N-Me-Val (48.4/52.0, 382.8). Peaks eluted with longer tR could be
attributed to the D-FDAA derivative of the amino acids. Consequently,
the absolute configuration of the moieties in the hydrolysate of 1 was
confirmed as L-Pro, L-Val, and N-Me-L-Val. The advanced Marfey
method indicated an N-Me-L-Ile unit in compound 1. However, this
was not conclusive since the N-Me-L-allo-Ile standard was not used.
The N-Me-L-Ile unit in 1 was subsequently confirmed on the basis of
extensive chiral HPLC analyses as well as chemical manipulation using
the advanced Marfey method (see below).
Methanolysis of Hantupeptin A (1). A solution of hantupeptin A
(1, 7.5 mg) in 5% methanolic KOH (0.75 mL) was stirred for 24 h at
RT. The reaction mixture was diluted with ether (15 mL), and the
organic layer was washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, and
subsequently dried under N2. Purification of 2 (1.5 mg) was ac-
complished by C18 SEP PAK [MeOH/H2O (1:1), MeOH/H2O (3:2),
MeOH/H2O (7:3)].
rate, 0.7 mL/min; detection at 218 nm]. Phenyllactic acid eluted at tR
) 19.5 min, corresponding to the retention time of an authentic sample
of L-3-phenyllactic acid and therefore indicating an S-configuration [tR
of D-3-phenyllactic acid ) 14.7 min].
Cell Viability Assays. Cells were plated in 96-well plates (MOLT-
4, 40 000 cells; MCF-7, 40 000 cells) and were treated 24 h later with
various concentrations of hantupeptin A (1) and solvent control (10%
DMSO). After 24 h of incubation, MTT was added to all wells followed
by lysis buffer. Plates were incubated for another 24 h, and cell viability
was measured by observing absorbance at 570 nm on a plate reader.
Acknowledgment. We acknowledge the SIBiol RTF and NIE AcRF
(RI 8/05 TLT) for financial support. The authors would like to thank
Dr. C. L. Sai (NSSE, NIE) for the use of the Shimadzu Preparative
HPLC system as well as P. Gread (University of Waikato), A. L. Ang
(NSSE, NIE), S. G. Y. Lee (NSSE, NIE), E. J. K. Low (NSSE, NIE),
and C. C. Teo (NSSE, NIE) for technical assistance. In addition, we
would like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their useful
comments.
Supporting Information Available: 1D and 2D NMR data and MS
fragmentation pattern of 1. This material is available free of charge
References and Notes
r-Methoxy-r-trifluoromethyl-r-phenylacetic Acid (MTPA) Es-
ters of 2. Compound 2 obtained from the methanolysis of 1 (see
preceding section) was divided into two equal portions (0.75 mg each),
and to each sample was added 0.75 mL of pyridine. To one portion
was added 6.0 mg of R-MTPACl and to the other 6.0 mg of S-MTPACl,
the reaction was carried out for 10 h at RT, and the solvent was
evaporated under N2. The corresponding esters, 3a and 3b, were
subjected to NMR analysis.
(1) Tan, L. T. Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 954–979.
(2) Gerwick, W. H.; Tan, L. T.; Sitachitta, N. In The Alkaloids; Cordell,
G. A., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, 2001; Vol. 57, pp 75-184.
(3) Ramaswamy, A. V.; Flatt, P. M.; Edwards, D. J.; Simmons, T. L.;
Han, B.; Gerwick, W. H. In Frontiers in Marine Biotechnology;
Proksch, P., Muller, W. E. G., Eds.; Horizon Bioscience, 2006; pp
175-224.
(4) (a) Harrigan, G. G.; Yoshida, W. Y.; Moore, R. E.; Nagle, D. G.;
Park, P. U.; Biggs, J.; Paul, V. J.; Mooberry, S. L.; Corbett, T. H.;
Valeriote, F. A. J. Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 1221–1225. (b) Luesch, H.;
Yoshida, W. Y.; Moore, R. E.; Paul, V. J. J. Nat. Prod. 1999, 62,
1702–1706.
1
3a: H NMR (CDCl3) δ 3.135 (H-2), 4.910 (H-3), 1.652 (H1-4),
1.653 (H-5), 1.511 (H2-6), 1.942 (H-8), 1.260 (H-9), 6.800 (NH), 4.754
(H-11), 2.061 (H-12), 0.980 (H-13), 0.950 (H-14), 2.965 (s, N-Me).
1
3b: H NMR (CDCl3) δ 3.102 (H-2), 4.922 (H-3), 1.673 (H1-4),
(5) (a) Luesch, H.; Yoshida, W. Y.; Moore, R. E.; Paul, V. J.; Mooberry,
S. L. J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 611–615. (b) Milligan, K. E.; Marquez,
B. L.; Williamson, R. T.; Gerwick, W. H. J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63,
1440–1443. (c) Luesch, H.; Yoshida, W. Y.; Moore, R. E.; Paul, V. J.
J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 1437–1439.
1.682 (H-5), 1.538 (H2-6), 1.953 (H-8), 1.220 (H-9), 6.750 (NH), 4.744
(H-11), 2.040 (H-12), 0.95 (H-13), 0.920 (H-14), 2.940 (s, N-Me).
Racemization of the N-Methyl-L-isoleucine Standard. Approxi-
mately 0.4 mg of the N-Me-L-Ile standard was dissolved in H2O (100
µL), followed by the addition of triethylamine (40 µL) and acetic
anhydride (40 µL). The mixture was heated at 60 °C for 1 h and
evaporated to dryness in a stream of N2. The residue was subsequently
dissolved in 6 N HCl (200 µL), heated at 110 °C for 12 h, and then
evaporated to dryness in a stream of N2.
Advanced Marfey’s Analysis of the Racemized N-Methyl-L-
isoleucine Standard. After racemization of the N-Me-L-Ile standard
[containing both N-Me-L-Ile and N-Me-D-allo-Ile], the advanced Marfey
method (using both L-Marfey’s and D-Marfey’s reagents) was used to
determine the retention times of the four stereoisomers of N-Me-L-Ile
using LCMS [column, Phenomenex, Luna, 150 × 2.0 mm, 5 µ, 100
Å; mobile phase, MeCN in 0.1% (v/v) aqueous HCOOH; flow rate,
0.20 mL/min using a linear gradient (10-50% MeCN over 70 min)].
The retention times and ESIMS product ions (tR in min) of the L/D-
FDAA-derivatized amino acids were as follows: N-Me-L-Ile (56.1),
N-Me-D-allo-Ile (60.3), N-Me-D-Ile ()D-FDAA-derivatized N-Me-L-
Ile, 59.9), and N-Me-L-allo-Ile ()D-FDAA-derivatized N-Me-D-allo-
Ile, 56.6). The tR of the N-Me-Ile unit in the hydrolysate of 1 was similar
to the L-FDAA-derivatized N-Me-L-Ile standard at 56.1 min, and this
was confirmed with coelution of both molecules.
(6) Jaspars, M.; Linda, A. L. Curr. Opp. Drug DiscoVery DeV. 1998, 1,
77–84.
(7) (a) Medina, R. A.; Goeger, D. E.; Hills, P.; Mooberry, S. L.; Huang,
N.; Romero, L. I.; Ortega-Barria, E.; Gerwick, W. H.; McPhail, K. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 20, 6324–6325. (b) Taori, K.; Paul, V. J.;
Luesch, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 6, 1806–1807. (c) Wrasidlo, W.;
Mielgo, A.; Torres, V. A.; Barbero, S.; Stoletov, K.; Suyama, T. L.;
Klemke, R. L.; Gerwick, W. H.; Carson, D. A.; Stupack, D. G. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105, 2313–2318.
(8) Tan, L. T.; Chang, Y. Y.; Tripathi, A. Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 2067–
2069.
(9) Marfey, P. Carlsberg Res. Commun. 1984, 49, 591–596.
(10) Fujii, K.; Ikai, Y.; Mayumi, T.; Oka, H.; Suzuki, M.; Harada, K.-I.
Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 3346–3352.
(11) Fujii, K.; Ikai, Y.; Oka, H.; Suzuki, M.; Harada, K.-I. Anal. Chem.
1997, 69, 5146–5151.
(12) Ohtani, I.; Kusumi, T.; Kashman, Y.; Kakisawa, H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 11, 4092–4096.
(13) Ferna´ndez, R.; Rodry´guez, J.; Quinoa´, E.; Riguera, R.; Munoz, L.;
Ferna´ndez-Sua´rez, M.; Debitus, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
11635–11643.
(14) Nakao, Y.; Yoshida, W. Y.; Szabo, C. M.; Baker, B. J.; Scheuer, P. J.
J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3272–3280.
Absolute Configuration of the 3-Phenyllactic Acid Unit in 1.
Hantupeptin A (1, 1.0 mg) was hydrolyzed in 6 N HCl at 110 °C for
12 h. The hydrolysate was concentrated to dryness and analyzed by
chiral HPLC [column, Chiralpak MA(+) (0.46 × 5 cm), Daicel
Chemical Industries Ltd., solvent, 2 mM CuSO4/MeCN (85:15); flow
(15) Bunyajetpong, S.; Yoshida, W. Y.; Sitachitta, N.; Kaya, K. J. Nat.
Prod. 2006, 11, 1539–1542.
(16) Smith, J. A.; Pease, L. G. CRC Crit. ReV. Biochem. 1980, 8, 315–399.
NP800448T