240 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2009, Vol. 52, No. 2
Letters
Scheme 5. Synthesis of Simplified Tubulysin Analogues 21-23
Acknowledgment. This work was generously supported by
the American Cancer Society, Grant RSG-05-105-01-CDD (to
R.A.F.) and was supported in part by intramural funds from
the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development,
NIH. Funding for NMR instrumentation in the Department of
Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics was provided
by the University of Minnesota Medical School, NSF (Grant
BIR-961577), and the Minnesota Medical Foundation.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
spectroscopic data, and NMR spectra for all new compounds. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
(1) (a) Sasse, F.; Steinmetz, H.; Heil, J.; Ho¨fle, G.; Reichenbach, H.
Tubulysins, new cytostatic peptides from myxobacteria acting on
microtubuli. J. Antibiot. 2000, 53, 879–885. (b) Steinmetz, H.; Glaser,
N.; Herdtweck, E.; Sasse, F.; Reichenbach, H.; Ho¨fle, G. Isolation,
crystal and solution structure determination, and biosynthesis of
tubulysinsspowerful inhibitors of tubulin polymerization from myxo-
bacteria. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4888–4892. (c) Khalil,
M. W.; Sasse, F.; Lu¨nsdorf, H.; Elnakady, Y. A.; Reichenbach, H.
Mechanism of action of tubulysin, an antimitotic peptide from
myxobacteria. ChemBioChem 2006, 7, 678–683. (d) Kaur, G.; Holl-
ingshead, M.; Holbeck, S.; Schauer-Vukasinovic, V.; Camalier, R. F.;
Do¨mling, A.; Agarwal, S. Biological evaluation of tubulysin A: a
potential anticancer and antiangiogenic natural product. Biochem. J.
2006, 396, 235–242.
(2) Sandmann, A.; Sasse, F.; Mu¨ller, R. Identification and analysis of the
core biosynthetic machinery of tubulysin, a potent cytotoxin with
potential anticancer activity. Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 1071–1079.
(3) Neri, D.; Fossati, G.; Zanda, M. Efforts toward the total synthesis of
tubulysins: new hopes for a more effective targeted drug delivery to
tumors. ChemMedChem 2006, 1, 175–180.
Table 1. Biological Activity of Tubulysins U and V and Analogues
inhibition of proliferation
(IC50, µM)b
tubulin
inhibition
compda
1A9
MCF-7
0.0004
0.24
(IC50, µM)c
3 (tubulysin U)
4 (tubulysin V)
18 (epi-tubulysin V)
21 (FT-040)Tc
22 (FT-039)
0.00065
0.12
1.9
1.1
1.3
3.6
12.5
8.5
5.1
8.1
>50
NDd
0.17
0.3
23 (FT-038)
14.2
12.2
HTI-286 (SPA110)
0.0002
0.00015
0.7
a Compounds were isolated and tested as their HCl salts. b Values are
the mean of two independent IC50 determinations with a maximum drug
concentration of 50 mM in DMSO. c In vitro inhibition of tubulin
polymerization. d ND: not determined.
(4) Peltier, H. M.; McMahon, J. P.; Patterson, A. W.; Ellman, J. A. The
total synthesis of tubulysin D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16018–
16019.
(5) (a) Sani, M.; Fossati, G.; Huguenot, F.; Zanda, M. Total synthesis of
tubulysins U and V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3526–3529.
(b) Do¨mling, A.; Beck, B.; Eichelberger, U.; Sakamuri, S.; Menon,
S.; Chen, Q.-Z.; Lu, Y.; Wessjohann, L. A. Total synthesis of tubulysin
U and V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7235–7239. (c) Do¨mling,
A.; Beck, B.; Eichelberger, U.; Sakamuri, S.; Menon, S.; Chen, Q.-
Z.; Lu, Y.; Wessjohann, L. A. Total synthesis of tubulysin U and V.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2347–2348 (Corrigendum).
(6) (a) Wipf, P.; Wang, Z. Total synthesis of N14-desacetoxytubulysin H.
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1605–1607. (b) Wang, Z.; McPherson, P. A.;
Raccor, B. S.; Balachandran, R.; Zhu, G.; Day, B. W.; Vogt, A.; Wipf,
P. Structure-activity and high-content imaging analyses of novel
tubulysins. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2007, 70, 75–86. (c) Patterson,
A. W.; Peltier, H. M.; Sasse, F.; Ellman, J. A. Design, synthesis, and
potential to cross cell membranes more effectively. The simplified
analogues 21-23, which contain an acyclic Mep variant, vary
widely in their antiproliferative activity. Compound 22 has sub-
micromolar activity similar to that of tubulysin V, whereas
compound 21 was not active at the highest concentration tested
(50 µM). Analogue 23 has intermediate activity that is less than
that of epi-tubulysin V. The antiproliferative assay results for
analogues 21-23 differ from the trends observed for other series,
where the incorporation of dimethyltubuphenylalanine increased
activity.6d,e
biological properties of highly potent tubulysin
D analogues.
Chem.sEur. J. 2007, 13, 9534–9541. (d) Raghavan, B.; Balasubra-
manian, R.; Steele, J. C.; Sackett, D. L.; Fecik, R. A. Cytotoxic
simplified tubulysin analogues. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 1530–1533.
(e) Balasubramanian, R.; Raghavan, B.; Steele, J. C.; Sackett, D. L.;
Fecik, R. A. Tubulysin analogs incorporating desmethyl and dimethyl
tubuphenylalanine derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18,
2996–2999. (f) Friestad, G. K.; Marie´, J.-C.; Deveau, A. M. Stereo-
selective Mn-mediated coupling of functionalized iodides and hydra-
zones: a synthetic entry to the tubulysin γ-amino acids. Org. Lett.
2004, 6, 3249–3252.
Tubulysins U and V and epi-tubulysin V approach the potency
of HTI-286 in the in vitro tubulin polymerization inhibition
assay. Interestingly, among all compounds evaluated in Table
1, inhibition of tubulin polymerization does not correlate with
antiproliferative activity. The reasons for this are not clear at
this time and are the subject of ongoing investigations.
We report here a stereoselective total synthesis of tubulysins U
and V, epi-tubulysin V, and a series of simplified analogues.
Biological evaluation of the natural products established the
importance of the acetate and hydroxyl groups in the Tuv residue.
The extremely potent antiproliferative activity of tubulysin U
indicates that a tertiary amide between the Ile and Tuv residues,
exemplified by the N,O-acetal found in tubulysins A and D, is not
required. Data obtained from the simplified analogues 21-23
suggest that a cyclic constraint at the N-terminal Mep residue is
not a requirement for activity. The results presented here suggest
ways to improve the antiproliferative activity of simplified tubulysin
analogues. These and other modifications to the tubulysin scaffold
and further biological evaluation of select analogues will be reported
in due course.
(7) Ohtani, I.; Kusumi, T.; Kashman, Y.; Kakisawa, H. High-field FT
NMR application of Mosher’s method. The absolute configurations
of marine terpenoids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4092–4096.
(8) Corey, E. J.; Helal, C. J. Reduction of carbonyl compounds with chiral
oxazaborolidine catalysts: a new paradigm for enantioselective catalysis
and a powerful synthetic method. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998,
37, 1986–2012.
(9) Gemal, A.; Luche, J. L. Lanthanoids in organic synthesis. 6. Reduction
of R-enones by sodium borohydride in the presence of lanthanoid
chlorides: synthetic and mechanistic aspects. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981,
103, 5454–5459.
(10) Hamel, E. Evaluation of antimitotic agents by quantitative comparisons
of their effects on the polymerization of purified tubulin. Cell Biochem.
Biophys. 2003, 38, 1–21.
JM8013579