Paper
RSC Advances
Conclusion
Enantioselective hydrolysis of racemic alcohol acetates by the
p-nitrobenzyl esterase (BsE) from Bacillus subtilis ECU0554 is
noteworthy for its excellent enantioselectivity (E > 100) and
strong tolerance against high substrate loading for all of the
m-substituted 1-phenylethanol acetates tested. This enantio-
selective hydrolysis using the BsE also provided an easy access
to m-substituted 1-phenylethanols with high enantio-purity and
the extremely high space-time yield.
Scheme 3 BsE-catalyzed enantioselective hydrolysis of 1-(3-chlorophenyl)ethyl
acetate with BsE at 59.6 g/100 mL scale.
(42% yield), representing an outstanding space-time yield of
920 g per L per day. The results suggest that the reaction could
be potentially used as a competitive process for the large-scale
production of enantiopure m-substituted 1-phenylethanols.
Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to Prof. Romas Kazlauskas at University of
Minnesota for his critical reading and fruitful revision of the
text and constructive suggestions on the protein modelling.
Thanks to the nancial supports from National Natural
Science Foundation of China (no. 31200050 & 21276082),
Ministry of Science and Technology, P.R. China (no.
Materials and methods
Molecular modeling
Molecular modeling was performed with Maestro (version 9.2,
Schrodinger, New York, NY, USA) using OPLS-2005 force eld11
starting with the X-ray crystal structure of Bacillus subtilis
esterase (PDB le ID: 1QE3).12 The dielectric constant was set to
1 to mimic the solvation effects of water. Hydrogen atoms were
added and His-399 was protonated. The geometry of structure
was optimized in a stepwise manner. Initially, the geometries of
the hydrogen atoms on water were optimized followed by the
hydrogen atoms on the protein. The whole protein with water
molecules was then optimized followed by water, whole protein
and the bound substrate. Each step in the optimization of the
geometry was conducted using the PolaRibiere conjugated
2011AA02A210
& 2011CB710800), and the Fundamental
Research Funds for the Central Universities, Ministry of
Education, P.R. China.
References
1 J. H. Hutchinson, T. J. Selders, B. W. Wang, J. M. Arruda,
J. R. Roppe and T. Parr, US Patent 20120015991A1, Amira
Pharmaceuticals Inc., 2012.
2 L. H. Li, C. Beaulieu, M. C. Carriere, D. Denis, G. Greig,
D. Guay, G. O'Neill, R. Zamboni and Z. Y. Wang, Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett., 2010, 20, 7462–7465.
gradient (PRCG) method with a maximum of 500ꢀ01iterations
and a convergence threshold of 0.005 kcal molꢀ1
.
˚
A
´
´
3 J. Mangas-Sanchez, M. Rodrıguez-Mata, E. Busto, V. Gotor-
´
Fernandez and V. Gotor, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 5304–
Enantioselective preparation of (R)-6a
5310.
BsE esterase (1.24 g) was added to a mixture of substrate 6 (59.6
g, 0.3 mol), ethanol (10 mL) and phosphate buffer (90 mL,
pH 8.0, 100 mM). The reaction mixture was magnetically
agitated at 30 ꢁC for 6 h. The pH was automatically adjusted to
8.0 by titrating 2 M NaOH. Following the removal of the enzyme
from the reaction mixture by ltration, the ltrate was extracted
three times with ethyl acetate. The organic layers were
combined, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated
under reduced pressure to give the crude residue, which was
puried by column chromatography on silica gel using a
mixture of petroleum ether and ethyl acetate (10 : 1, v/v) as the
eluent. The separated substrate and product were recovered by
removal of the solvent under reduced pressure and dried under
vacuum. The product was characterized by 1H NMR and its
optical purity was determined by chiral gas chromatography
and polarimetry.
4 K. Kodama, A. Kanno, E. Sekine and T. Hirose, Org. Biomol.
Chem., 2012, 10, 1877–1882.
´
5 R. Kourist, P. D. de Marıa and U. T. Bornscheuer,
ChemBioChem, 2008, 9, 491–498.
6 G. W. Zheng and J. H. Xu, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2012, 22,
784–792.
´
¨
7 B. Martın- Matute and J.-E. Backvall, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.,
2007, 11, 226–232.
8 G. W. Zheng, H. L. Yu, J. D. Zhang and J. H. Xu, Adv. Synth.
Catal., 2009, 351, 405–414.
9 G. W. Zheng, J. Pan, H. L. Yu, M. T. Ngo-Thi, C. X. Li and
J. H. Xu, J. Biotechnol., 2010, 150, 108–114.
10 A. S. Bommarius and B. R. Riebel, Biocatalysis
–
Fundamentals and Applications, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2004, p. 36.
11 W. L. Jorgensen, D. S. Maxwell and J. Tirado-Rives, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 11225–11236.
12 B. Spiller, A. Gershenson, F. H. Arnold and R. C. Stevens,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1999, 96, 12305–12310.
(R)-1-(3-Chlorophenyl)ethanol (6a)13
Yield: 42% (19.6 g). [a]D30: +43.2 (c 1.00, CHCl3), 97% ee; 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3): d (ppm) 7.36 (s, 1H), 7.29–7.21 (m, 3H), 4.88– 13 M. N. Cheemala, M. Gayral, J. M. Brown, K. Rossen and
4.82 (m, 1H), 2.10 (d, J ¼ 3.2 Hz, 1H), 1.47 (d, J ¼ 6.0 Hz, 3H).
P. Knochel, Synthesis, 2007, 24, 3877–3885.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 20446–20449 | 20449