the absolute configurations of C-4 and C-5 are the same as
those of â-CD, the large J4,5, which is comparable to that of
â-CD and reveals the trans-diaxial displacement pattern of
H-5 and H-4, strongly implies that the pyranosides take a
4C1 chair conformation. The similarly large J3,4 means that
the H-3 is also in axial orientation, and the O-3 is trans to
the O-4. Accordingly, the mannoside structure can be
deduced on the basis of the cis geometrical selectivity of
OsO4 oxidation. The small coupling constants J1,2 and J2,3
elucidation of a H-bonding interaction between any two
adjacent pyranosides. As shown in Table 1, the chemical
Table 1. 1H NMR Chemical Shifts δ [ppm],a,b Chemical Shift
3
Differences ∆δ [ppm], and Coupling Constants JOH,CH [Hz] for
the Hydroxyl Protons in DMSO-d6 at 35 °C
2-OH
∆δ
4.66 0.02 4.8
3-OH
δ
J
δ
∆δ
J
4
also support the C1 mannopyranoside structure. Moreover,
1
3 was the same as that reported for â-cyclomannin3 in H
â-cyclomannin (3)
4.55 0.08 6.9
4.6 or 5.5 4.47 6.0
5.48 1.02 2.5
6.6 4.46 5.1
R-methyl D-mannopyranoside 4.64d
and 13C NMR spectra. Thus, compound 3 is assigned to
â-cyclomannin.
â-CD (1)c
5.52 1.11 6.7
R-methyl D-glucopyranosidec 4.41
The successful isolation of â-cyclomannin indicates that
the oxidation is highly selective for mannopyranoside over
allopyranoside, otherwise 1.5 dozens of hetero-cyclooli-
gosaccharides with different allo-/manno- ratios would be
generated from 2, making it very difficult to separate any
one product from the reaction mixture. Similar selectivity
was also observed in the oxidation of methyl 4,6-O-
benzylidene-2,3-didehydroxy-R-D-glucopyranoside 414 and
monoolefin 6,15 which gave only the corresponding man-
nopyranosides 5 and 7,16 respectively (Scheme 2). The
a Chemical shifts relative to TMS. b Chemical shifts for the H-1’s of 3,
R-methyl D-mannopyranoside, â-CD, and R-methyl D-glucopyranoside are
4.72, 4.49, 4.68, and 4.32 ppm, respectively. c Ref 17. d Overlapped with
the signals of 4-OH.
shifts and coupling constants (J2OH,H2 and J3OH,H3) of the 2-OH
and 3-OH protons of 3 are quite similar to the corresponding
values of R-methyl D-mannopyranoside. However, â-CD,
which is well-known to have strong H-bonding between the
2-OH and 3′-OH of adjacent glucosides, displays very large
downfield shifts (∆δ > 1 ppm) for both the 2-OH and 3-OH
protons together with a half-decreased coupling constant for
3-OH in comparison with their component analogue R-meth-
Scheme 2. Transformation of Olefins 4 and 6 to Mannosides
5 and 7, Respectively
17
yl D-glucopyranoside in DMSO-d6 as well as in D2O.18
These results imply that cyclomannin 3 has no intramolecular
H-bonding interaction between the 3-OHs and the 2′-OHs
of neighboring mannosides even in DMSO.
Because the axial 2-OH of 3 disrupts the intramolecular
H-bonding, releasing itself and 3-OH for intermolecular
H-bonding with bulk water, compound 3 is much more
water-soluble than â-CD. A preliminary assay indicated that
the water solubility of 3 is more than 30 g/10 mL at 25 °C
whereas that of â-CD19 is 0.19 g/10 mL at 27 °C.
Differently from â-CD, â-cyclomannin 3 has the 2-OHs
directed to the outside of the cavity. This alternation of the
(16) Synthesis of 5: an olefin 414 (25 mg), N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide
(23.4 mg), and aqueous 0.1 M OsO4 (40 µL) solution was added to a mixed
solvent composed of water (0.5 mL) and MeCN (1 mL). The resultant
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 6 days. After the addition of
a saturated aqueous solution of Na2SO3 (2 mL), the reaction mixture was
extracted three times with AcOEt. The extracts were combined, washed
with 1 M HCl and then water, and dried over Na2SO4. Evaporation of the
solvents afforded crude 5 (28.4 mg) which was purified by preparative TLC
on silica gel (eluted with of AcOEt) to give pure 5 (22.7 mg, 80%): 1H
NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, 35 °C, TMS) δ ) 7,49 and 7.37 (m, 5H, C6H5),
5.57 (s, 1H, benzylic H), 4.77 (s, 1H, H1), 4.29 (dd, 3J(H,H) ) 3.7, 9.2
formation of mannosides was suggested by the all-axial
displacements of the H-3, H-4, and H-5 protons which were
elucidated by the large coupling constants J3,4 and J4,5 of 5
and 7. Moreover, acid hydrolysis of 7 demonstrated that it
was composed of one mannose and six glucoses.
The axial displacement of the 2-OHs of 3 prevents each
2-OH from forming an intramolecular H-bond with the 3-OH
of its adjacent sugar unit. Evidence for this was collected
by 1H NMR measurements. The 1H NMR of 3 in DMSO-d6
showed two doublets for 2-OH and 3-OH protons that were
identified by the 1H,1H-COSY spectrum. R-Methyl D-
mannopyranoside represents the basic structure of the sugar
units of 3 and was taken as a reference compound for the
3
Hz, 1H, H6), 4.08-4.05 (m, 2H, H2 and H3), 3.92 (t, J(H,H) ) 9.2 Hz,
1H, H4), 3.86-3.81 (m, 2H, H5 and H6), 3.40 (s, 3H, OCH3), 2.73 and
2.71 (2H, 2- and 3-OHs); EI MS m/z (%) ) 282 (65) [M+], 105 (100)
[C7H5O+]. Synthesis of 7: a procedure similar to that for the preparation
of 3 was used starting with olefin 615 (316 mg) to give the product 7 (253
mg, 78%): 1H NMR (mannoside, 500 MHz, D2O, 35 °C, MeCN) δ )
4.86 (d, 3J(H,H) ) 2.1 Hz, 1H, H1), 4.04 (broad t, 1H, H2), 4.00 (dd,
3
3J(H,H) ) 3.3, 8.6 Hz, 1H, H3), 3.69 (t, J(H,H) ) 8.9 Hz, 1H, H4); 13C
NMR (mannoside, 125 MHz, D2O, 35 °C, MeCN) δ ) 104.0 (C1), 79.8
(C4), 71.1 (C3), 70.6 (C-2); FAB MS m/z ) 1135 [M + H+].
(17) Onda, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Inoue, Y.; Chujo, R. Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn. 1988, 61, 4015.
(18) Bekiroglu, S.; Kenne, L.; Sandstro¨m, C. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
1671 and refs cited therein.
(19) French, D.; Levine, M. L.; Pazur, J. H.; Norberg, E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1949, 71, 353.
(14) Guthrie, R. D.; Murphy, D. J. Chem. Soc. 1965, 6666.
(15) Yuan, D.-Q.; Tahara, T.; Chen, W.-H.; Okabe, Y.; Yang, C.; Yagi,
Y.; Nogami, Y.; Fukudome, M.; Fujita, K. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9456.
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 25, 2006
5735