J.-Y. Kim et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 550–553
553
Table 1. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs, lg/mL) for compounds 1, 2a–g, 2j, 2m–r, 3a–d, 4a–h
Compound
X
Y
Z
R
EC TnT IC50 (lM)
S. a. MIC
S. p. MIC
S. py. MIC
E. f. MIC
1 linezolid
2a
2b
3.6
2
1
2
4
H
F
F
F
H
F
F
F
H
F
F
F
H
F
H
F
F
F
H
F
F
F
H
F
F
F
H
H
F
H
H
H
F
—
—
8
8
8
16
2
2.30
1.67
3.93
4
2
2
2c
2d
—
—
2
1
1
1
F
2
1
2
2
2e
H
H
F
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
F
—
—
16
32
8
16
32
16
>64
16
1
32
32
8
32
64
32
>64
16
2
2f
2g
—
—
2j
H
H
F
>64
16
2
>64
8
2m
2n
NHC(@O)OMe
NHC(@O)OMe
NHC(@O)Et
NHC(@O)Et
—
—
—
—
—
—
H
1.90
2.10
3.49
1
2o
2p
F
2
2
1
2
F
4
4
4
4
2q
H
F
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
F
>64
4
>64
4
>64
2
>64
8
2r
3a
H
F
16
2
16
2
8
32
2
3b
3c
1
F
>32
4
4
2
>32
2
3d
4a
F
2
2
H
H
F
32
8
32
16
4
64
8
64
16
8
4b
4c
H
H
5.87
23.4
4
4
4d
4e
F
H
16
32
16
4
16
32
8
16
32
8
32
64
16
8
H
H
F
H
H
H
F
Me
Me
Me
Me
4f
4g
6.37
18.9
4
16
4
16
4h
F
16
32
Strains: S. a., Staphylococcus aureus UC-76 SA-1; S. p., Streptococcus pneumoniae SV1 SP-3; E. f., Enterococcus faecalis MGH-2 EF1-1; S. py.,
Streptococcus pyogenes C-203.
M.; Pagano, P. J.; Ross, D.; Zhu, T.; Zurenko, G. E.;
Vara Prasad, J. V. N. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50,
5886.
shown to retain antibacterial potency with in vitro activ-
ity of many compounds synthesized in this series compa-
rable to linezolid’s in vitro activity.
6. (a) For experimental details and 1H NMR data, see: Vara
Prasad, J. V. N.; Boyer, F. E.; Kim, J.-Y. WO 2007/
000644 A; (b) Barbachyn, M. R.; Brickner, S. J. WO 95/
07271 A; (c) Perrault, W. R.; Pearlman, B. A.; Godrej, D.
B.; Jegan-Herrnton, P. M.; Gadwood, R. C.; Chan, L.;
Lyster, M. A.; Maloney, M. T. Org. Process Res. Dev.
2003, 7, 533.
References and notes
1. For recent reviews of linezolid, see: (a) Wilcox, M. H.
Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2005, 6, 2315; (b) Stevens, D.
L.; Madaras-Kelly, K. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2004,
2, 51; (c) Nilius, A. M. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 2003, 4,
149; (d) Moellering, R. C. Ann. Inter. Med. 2003, 138, 135.
2. Brickner, S. J.; Hutchinson, D. K.; Barbachyn, M. R.;
Manninen, P. R.; Ulanowicz, D. A.; Garmon, S. A.;
Grega, K. C.; Hendges, S. K.; Toops, D. S.; Ford, C. W.;
Zurenko, G. E. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 673.
7. The nucleophilic aromatic substitution resulted only in the
desired regioisomers in high yields with no other regioi-
somers detected during the reaction. Highly regioselective
reactions of this type, indicated by extreme high yields of
the desired isomers, have been previously reported:
Barbachyn, M. R.; Harris, C. R.; Vara Prasad, J. V. N.
WO 2005/113520 A1.
8. Rostovtsev, V. V.; Green, L. G.; Fokin, V. V.; Sharpless,
K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2596.
3. Barbachyn, M. R.; Ford, C. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2003, 42, 2010.
9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (formerly,
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards).
Methods for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaer-
obic Bacteria; Approved Standard, 6th ed.; NCCLS
Document M11-A6; Vol. 24, No. 2.
10. (a) Murray, R. W.; Melchior, E. P.; Hagadorn, J. C.;
Marotti, K. R. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45,
1900; (b) Zubay, G. Ann. Rev. Genet. 1973, 7, 267.
4. Reck, F.; Zhou, F.; Girardot, M.; Kern, G.; Eyermann, C.
J.; Hales, N. J.; Ramsay, R. R.; Gravestock, M. B. J. Med.
Chem. 2005, 499.
5. Poel, T.-J.; Thomas, R. C.; Adams, W. J.; Aristoff, P.
A.; Barbachyn, M. R.; Blakeman, D. P.; Boyer, F. E.;
Brieland, J.; Brideau, R.; Brodfuehrer, J.; Choy, A. L.;
Dority, M.; Ford, C. W.; Gadwood, R. C.; Hamel, J.
C.; Huband, M. D.; Huber, C.; Kim, J.-Y.; Joseph,