3482
P. T. Jubinsky et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 3479–3482
5. (a) Mokranjac, D.; Bourenkov, G.; Hell, K.; Neupert, W.; Groll, M. EMBO J. 2006,
Steric and physicochemical complementarity between com-
25, 4675; (b) Kozany, C.; Mokranjac, D.; Sichting, M.; Neupert, W.; Hell, K. Nat.
Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004, 11, 234.
6. Jubinsky, P. T.; Short, M. K.; Mutema, G.; Morris, R. E.; Ciraolo, G. M.; Li, M. J.
Mol. Histol. 2005, 36, 69.
pound 9 and the Tim14–Tim16 heterodimer interface was ob-
served in the model (Fig. 4). Because the hydrophobic substituted
cyclohexyl appears to interact with residues (F95 and L100) that
stabilize the heterodimer through multiple van der Walls interac-
tions, it is predicted that compound 9 binding results in complex
dissociation. In addition, compound 9 likely interferes with the
N-terminal arm of Tim14 that interacts with Tim16 helix III, known
to be necessary for complex formation and function.5a
The binding mode prediction supports the importance of a
hydrophilic guanidinium moiety to correctly align the small mole-
cule at the dimer interface, along with hydrophobic groups at the
opposite end of the molecule to induce an alternative conformation
for the N-terminal arm of Tim14. Confirmation of this model by
NMR, Magmas mutagenesis and crystal structures are planned.
Several SMMIs that are biologically active in yeast were synthe-
sized. Over-expression of Magmas and the isolation of Magmas
mutants with both increased and decreased sensitivity to 9
showed that Magmas is a target in vivo, while the fluorometric
titration experiments demonstrated a direct physical interaction.
We also showed that compound 9 is predicted to functionally
interact with Magmas using computational modeling. SMMIs
should prove useful for studying mitochondrial function and may
have clinical relevance for a variety of human diseases. The effects
of SMMI on CNS malignancies are under evaluation, as are efforts
to develop agents that can monitor Magmas function in vivo.
7. (a) van de Vijver, M. J.; He, Y. D.; Van’t Veer, L. J.; Dai, H.; Hart, A. A.; Voskuil, D.
W.; Schreiber, G. J.; Peterse, J. L.; Roberts, C.; Marton, M. J.; Parrish, M.; Atsma,
D.; Witteveen, A.; Glas, A.; Delahaye, L.; van der Velde, T.; Bartelink, H.;
Rodenhuis, S.; Rutgers, E. T.; Friend, S. H.; Bernards, R. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002,
347, 1999; (b) Desmedt, C.; Piette, F.; Loi, S.; Wang, Y.; Lallemand, F.; Haibe-
Kains, B.; Viale, G.; Delorenzi, M.; Zhang, Y.; d’Assignies, M. S.; Bergh, J.;
Lidereau, R.; Ellis, P.; Harris, A. L.; Klijn, J. G.; Foekens, J. A.; Cardoso, F.; Piccart,
M. J.; Buyse, M.; Sotiriou, C. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 3207; (c) Tagliati, F.;
Gentilin, E.; Buratto, M.; Mole, D.; degli Uberti, E. C.; Zatelli, M. C. Endocrinology
2010, 151, 4635.
8. (a) Sinha, D.; Joshi, N.; Chittoor, B.; Samji, P.; D’Silva, P. Human Mol. Genet. 2010,
19, 1248; (b) Elsner, S.; Simian, D.; Iosefson, O.; Marom, M.; Azem, A. Int. J. Mol.
Sci. 2009, 10, 2041.
9. (a) Shridhar, D. R.; Reddy Sastry, C. V.; Bansal, O. P.; Pulla Rao, P. P. Synthesis
1981, 19, 2; (b) Liu, F.; Evans, T.; Das, B. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 1578.
10. Detail experimental procedures for compound (9): The syntheis of acid 16
involves the reaction with methyl magnesium bromide with b-cyclocitral in
THF to give the alcohol as a yellow oil.13 The alcohol gave satisfactory spectral
data and was directly converted to the triphenyl phosphine salt by treatment
with triphenylphosphine hydrobromide in methanol. Recrystalization of the
salt from methanol/ether (1:6) gave a yellow crystalline solid.14 Formation of
the Witting reagent from the salt in ether was accomplished with n-
butyllithium in hexane at room temperature (dark-red color). The Witting
reagent was treated with methyl 4-formybenoate in ether at ꢃ78 °C for 10–
15 min and then stirred at room temperature under a nitrogen atmosphere for
30 h. The crude ester was purified by flash column chromatography (hexane/
ethyl acetate: 98:2) to give a brown oil in 85% yield.15 The ester was saponified
to generate a white solid which was filtered, washed with water, and dried. The
product was recrystallized from hot ethanol and washed with dry hexane to
give acid as white crystals (87%) yield. The structure was confirmed by 1H, 13
NMR and NOE experiment, HMBC, and HRMS. mixture of acid 16
C
A
Acknowledgements
(300 mg;1.05 mmol) in dry DMF (4 mL) and CDI (171 mg;1.05 mmol) was
stirred at room temperature under nitrogen atmosphere for 1 h. Guanidine
base was prepared by consecutive additive of sodium-tert-butoxide (201.8 mg,
2.1 mmol) and guanidine hydrochloride (200 mg, 2.1 mmol) to a dry mixture of
dimethylformamide/dioxane (1:1, 8 mL) under nitrogen, this mixture was
heated to 50–55 °C for 20 min, and then the NaCl was filtered. The solution of
CDI and acid was added to the guanidine base solution. The mixture was stirred
at room temperature for 6 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored by
TLC. After the reaction was completed the mixture was evaporated and the
DMF was removed under vaccum. The residue suspended in cold water (8 mL).
The crystaline solid was filtered, washed with water, and dried, then purified
by fractional crystalization from methanol to give a white solid 340 mg (87%).
Mp: 165–167 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, acetone-d6): 7.90–7.82(d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H),
7.40 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 6.47(s, 1H);2.55 (m, 2H), 2.19 (q, 3H), 1.86 (s, 3H);1.44
(m, 2H), 1.05 (s, 6H) and 1.03 (t, J = 8 Hz, 3H) 13C NMR CDCl3: 177.2;163.8,
147.6, 141.5, 140.9, 137.2, 129.06, 128.7, 127.5, 121.6, 39.1, 35.9, 28.6,
This study was supported by the James B. Ax Family Founda-
tion. We thank E. Richard Stanley and Donna Alex for their contin-
ued encouragement and Ruben Abagyan and Macro Neves for their
assistance with the modeling of SMMI and Magmas.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
27.5, 24.4, 22.9, 14.9 and 14.6 ESI-MS: Calcd for
326.2227; found: 326.2223.
C
20H27 N3O ([M+H]+)
1. Jubinsky, P. T.; Messer, A.; Bender, J.; Morris, R. E.; Ciraolo, G. M.; Witte, D. P.;
Hawley, R. G.; Short, M. K. Exp. Hematol. 2001, 29, 1392.
2. Jubinsky, P. T.; Short, M. K.; Mutema, G.; Witte, D. P. J. Histochem. Cytochem.
2003, 51, 585.
3. Peng, J.; Huang, C. H.; Short, M. K.; Jubinsky, P. T. In Silico Biol. 2005, 5, 251.
4. (a) Li, Y.; Dudek, J.; Guiard, B.; Pfanner, N.; Rehling, P.; Voos, W. J. Biol. Chem.
2004, 279, 38047; (b) D’Silva, P. R.; Schilke, B.; Walter, W.; Craig, E. A. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 12419; (c) Frazier, A. E.; Dudek, J.; Guiard, B.; Voos,
W.; Li, Y.; Lind, M.; Meisinger, C.; Geissler, A.; Sickmann, A.; Meyer, H. E.;
Bilanchone, V.; Cumsky, M. G.; Truscott, K. N.; Pfanner, N.; Rehling, P. Nat.
Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004, 11, 226.
11. Boeke, J. D.; Trueheart, J.; Natsoulis, G.; Fink, G. R. Methods Enzymol. 1987, 154,
164.
12. Totrov, M.; Abagyan, R. Proteins 1997, Suppl 1, 215.
13. Fernandez-Mateos, A.; Mateos Buron, L.; Martin de la Nava, E. M.; Rubio
Gonzalez, R. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3585.
14. Rosenberger, M.; Neukom, C. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 1782.
15. Waugh, K. M.; Berlin, K. D.; Ford, W. T.; Holt, E. M.; Carrol, J. P.; Schomber, P. R.;
Thompson, M. D.; Schiff, L. J. J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 116.