substituent R is an alkyl group. Therefore, access to the
piperidine alkaloids 8 or 9 would be readily predicted from
a homoallylic amine precursor 10, but regiocontrol issues
would be expected in the case where R) H, corresponding
to sedridine (7; Scheme 2).
16b are not separable, we could not determine whether the
low dr is due to inherently low selectivity, or due to opposite
diastereofacial preferences for each diastereomer.
An alternative approach was pursued in an attempt to
improve diastereoselectivity at the stage of amine borane
complexation. Presumably, the reaction of 14b with THF/
borane occurs with low diastereoselectivity because there is
little energy difference between the nitrogen invertomers
(axial vs equatorial lone pairs in the chairlike structure).8
Better conformational control was expected starting with the
N-benzyl substrate, so 15b was evaluated in the complexation
step with THF/borane (Scheme 4). Assuming that 15b reacts
Scheme 2. Synthesis of rac-2-(2′-Alkenyl)-piperidines
Scheme 4. Intramolecular Hydroboration from 15
Our investigation began with conversion of racemic
2-piperidineethanol 11 into the protected aldehyde 12,
followed by Wittig olefination (KOtBu/THF) to afford the
alkenes 13a-c. Structures 13b and 13c were obtained as
9:1 and 13:1 Z:E mixtures, respectively, and were used as
such in the following steps. Deprotection and benzylation
then provided the desired 2-(2′-alkenyl)-piperidine substrates
14 and 15.
Treatment of the N-H piperidines 14 (Scheme 3) with
THF-borane at -20 °C afforded amine boranes 16 as
diastereomer mixtures. The terminal alkene 16a could not
via the more stable all-equatorial conformer (lone pair axial),
the major product should be 18b (axial BH3 subunit). The
exact dr was difficult to measure because the starting amine
15b contains 11% of the isomeric E-alkene, but comparison
of the N-benzyl signals indicated a ratio of ca. 8:1 in favor
of the isomer 18b as shown in Scheme 4.
Scheme 3. Intramolecular Hydroboration from 14
Upon activation of 18b with TfOH (-20 °C, 16 h)
followed by oxidative workup, the products 20 and 21 were
obtained in an improved ratio of 4:1, this time favoring the
(6) Maio, W. A.; Sinishtaj, S.; Posner, G. H. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2673.
(7) Extensive synthetic work targetting piperidine alkaloids is described
in ref 4. For selected recent studies, see: (a) Davis, F. A.; Prasad, K. R.;
Nolt, M. B.; Wu, Y. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 925. (b) Kochi, T.; Tang, T. P.;
Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11276. (c) Lesma, G.; Crippa,
S.; Danieli, B.; Passarella, D.; Sacchetti, A.; Silvani, A.; Virdis, A.
Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 6437. (d) Passarella, D.; Barilli, A.; Belinghieri, F.;
Fassi, P.; Riva, S.; Sacchetti, A.; Silvani, A.; Danieli, B. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2005, 16, 2225.
be purified due to partial decomplexation at rt, but the
disubstituted alkene analogs 16b and 16c survived chroma-
tography and were isolated as diastereomer mixtures (ca. 2:1
dr). Activation of 16b with iodine or with TfOH gave
aminoalcohol products after oxidative workup. However, the
diastereomer ratio of 8:17 was only 1:1.2 according to NMR
comparisons.5 Because the diastereomers of the amine borane
(8) Allinger, N. L.; Carpenter, J. G. D.; Karkowski, F. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1965, 87, 1232. Bishop, R. J.; Sutton, L. E.; Dineen, D.; Jones, R. A. Y.;
Katritzky, A. R.; Wyatt, R. J. J. Chem. Soc. B 1967, 493.
1060
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 5, 2009