reactions, isocyanates have been employed as effective inter-
mediates because of their high reactivity,8 e.g., in Schmidt
rearrangement,9 Hofmann rearrangement,10 Curtius
rearrangement,11 Lossen rearrangement,12 and Buchererꢀ
Bergs reaction.13
sole product. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis
revealed the structure of this product (Figure 1).15
A
few quinoline syntheses from o-alkynylaniline deriva-
tives have been reported, for example, using Masamuneꢀ
Bergman type cyclization of enyne-isocyanates synthesized
from o-alkynylanilines,16 carbocyclization of N-(o-alkynyl)-
malonamides with base17a or an electrochemical method,17b
and Michael Addition of NH group of carbamate to con-
jugated enones from alkyne-carbonyl metathesis of o-alky-
nylanilines and aldehydes.18 These reactions are considered
to be conceptually different from the present reaction with
carbon dioxide incorporation and rearrangement. Herein,
we would like to report an efficient preparation of 4-hydro-
xyquinolin-2(1H)-one derivatives from o-alkynylanilines and
carbon dioxide.
We recently reported the silver-catalyzed preparation
of benzoxazin-2-one derivatives from o-alkynylaniline de-
rivatives and carbon dioxide.14 It was considered that the
amino group and carbon dioxide would form the corre-
sponding carbamate followed by 6-exo-dig cyclization on
the alkyne activated by a silver catalyst. Upon optimiza-
tion, it was found that DBU was the most effective base for
the reaction of secondary o-alkynylanilines to afford the
corresponding benzoxazin-2-one derivatives in high yield
(eq 1). However, for primary o-alkynylanilines, DABCO
was the most suitable base (eq 2). When DBU was
employed for the reaction of primary o-alkynylanilines,
the corresponding products were not obtained at all (eq 3);
nevertheless, the starting material was completely con-
sumed. After carefully investigating the reaction mixture,
4-hydroxyquinolin-2-one was surprisingly generated asthe
Figure 1. Single-crystalX-raydiffractionanalysisfor2a0. Thermal
ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level. The single
crystal was obtained after methylation of 2a with trimethyl-
silyldiazomethane.
(7) (a) Aucejo, A.; Burguet, M. C.; Corma, A.; Fornes, V. Appl.
Catal. 1986, 22, 187–200. (b) Curtin, T.; McMonagle, J. B.; Hodnett,
B. K. Appl. Catal., A 1992, 93, 75–89. (c) Kob, N.; Drago, R. S. Catal.
Lett. 1997, 49, 229–234. (d) Holton, R. A.; Somoza, C.; Kim, H.-B.;
Liang, F.; Biediger, R. J.; Boatman, P. D.; Shindo, M.; Smith, C. C.;
Kim, S.; Nadizadeh, H.; Suzuki, Y.; Tao, C.; Vu, P.; Tang, S.; Zhang, P.;
Murthi, K. K.; Gentile, L. N.; Liu, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,
1597–1598. (e) Shimizu, Y.; Shi, S.-L.; Usuda, H.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1103–1106.
(8) Delebecq, E.; Pascault, J.-P.; Boutevin, B.; Ganachaud, F. Chem.
Rev. 2013, 113, 80–118.
(9) (a) Schmidt, K. F. Z. Angew. Chem. 1923, 36, 511. (b) Schultz,
A. G.; Wang, A.; Alva, C.; Sebastian, A.; Glick, S. D.; Deecher, D. C.;
Bidlack, J. M. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 1956–1966.
(10) Hofmann, A. W. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1881, 14, 2725–2736. (b)
Evans, D. A.; Scheidt, K. A.; Downey, C. W. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3009–3012.
(11) (a) Buchner, E.; Curtius, T. Chem. Ber. 1885, 18, 2371–2377. (b)
Carda, M.; Gonzalez, F.; Sanchez, R.; Marco, J. A. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2002, 13, 1005–1010.
(12) (a) Lossen, W. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1869, 150, 313–325.
(b) Ohmoto, K.; Yamamoto, T.; Horiuchi, T.; Kojima, T.; Hachiya,
K.; Hashimoto, S.; Kawamura, M.; Nakai, H.; Toda, M. Synlett 2001,
299–301.
(13) (a) Bucherer, H. T.; Fischbeck, H. T. J. Prakt. Chem. 1934, 140,
69. (b) Sarges, R.; Goldstein, S. W.; Welch, W. M.; Swindell, A. C.;
Siegel, W. S.; Beyer, T. A. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33, 1859–1865.
(14) Ishida, T.; Kikuchi, S.; Tsubo, T.; Yamada, T. Org. Lett. 2013,
15, 848–851.
(15) Crystallographic data reported in this paper have been deposited
with Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary pub-
lication no. CCDC-904718. Copies of the data can be obtained free of
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12, Union Road, Cambridge,
CB2 1EZ, U.K.; Fax þ44 1223 336033; or deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
Scheme 1 shows the hypothetical reaction mechanism
to explain these observations. First, the corresponding
benzoxazin-2-one would form from the o-alkynylaniline
and carbon dioxide catalyzed by the silver catalyst. In
the second step, the benzoxazine would immediately be
deprotonated with DBU base to generate the isocyanate
and the enolate from CꢀO bond cleavage of the carbamate
functionality. The enolate would then attack the carbon
atom of the isocyanate to afford the 1,3-diketone inter-
mediate, which would producethe corresponding 4-hydro-
xyquinolin-2(1H)-one after enolization. Thus, in this pro-
posed mechanism, a new CꢀC bond is formed with carbon
dioxide. It is expected that the corresponding quinoline
derivative should contain carbon dioxide.
On the basis of our previous report, if a benzoxazin-2-
one is formed as an intermediate, a silver-catalyzed process
shouldberequired. Variousmetal salts expectedtoactivate
(16) Li, H.; Yang, H.; Petersen, J. L.; Wang, K. K. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 69, 4500–4508.
(17) (a) Arcadi, A.; Cacchi, S.; Fabrizi, G.; Manna, F.; Pace, P.
Synlett 1998, 446–448. (b) Arcadi, A.; Inesi, A.; Marinelli, F.; Rossi, L.;
Verdecchia, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 2430–2437.
(18) Saito, A.; Kasai, J.; Odaira, Y.; Fukaya, H.; Hanzawa, Y. J. Org.
Chem. 2009, 74, 5644–5647.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 14, 2013
3711