C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
To elucidate the relationship between the base-dependent generation
of the requisite phosphite anion revealed by the NMR study and its
reactivity as a P-nucleophile, the catalytic activity of each organic base
was systematically examined in the hydrophosphonylation of benzal-
dehyde with 3 (Table 1). DBU and TMG showed similar reactivities,
In conclusion, the generation of chiral tetraaminophosphonium
phosphite has been detected by low-temperature NMR analysis, and
its synthetic relevance has been successfully demonstrated by its
application to the establishment of highly efficient and enantioselective
hydrophosphonylation of aldehydes. A comparison of 2 with repre-
sentative strong organic bases clearly shows that the molecular structure
of the cationic conjugate acid is a key element for substantial generation
of phosphite anions with an unprecedented level of nucleophilicity as
well as for rigorous stereocontrol. We believe that the present study
offers a general yet valuable framework for designing even more
superior chiral organic base catalysts.
Table 1. Dependence of Reaction Efficiency on Catalyst
Structurea
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid
for Scientific Research on Priority Areas “Advanced Molecular
Transformation of Carbon Resources” from MEXT and Grants of
JSPS for Scientific Research.
entry
catalyst
x
temp (°C)
time (h)
yieldb (%)
eec (%)
d
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DBU
TMG
BEMP
TBD
2a
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
1
1
-20
-20
-78
-78
-78
-78
-78
-78
-78
-98
2
2
2
2
1
4
0.5
0.25
1
-
-
-
-
85
78
92
78
91
98
43 (45)
d
30 (33)
97
95
97
98
92
99
99
97
Supporting Information Available: Representative experimental
procedures and the details of the NMR study. This material is available
2b
2c
2d
2c
References
2c
4
(1) (a) Engel, R. Org. React. 1988, 36, 175–248. (b) A Guide to Organophos-
phorus Chemistry; Quin, L. D., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2000.
(c) Kolodiazhnyi, O. I. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 3295.
(2) (a) Pudovik, A. N.; Konovalova, I. V. Synthesis 1979, 81. (b) Enders, D.;
Saint-Dizier, A.; Lannou, M.-I.; Lenzen, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 29.
(3) (a) Stawinski, J.; Kraszewski, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 952. (b)
Kraszewski, A.; Stawinski, J. Pure. Appl. Chem. 2007, 79, 2217.
(4) (a) Doak, G. O.; Freedman, L. D. Chem. ReV. 1961, 61, 31. (b) Pietro,
W. J.; Hehre, W. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 3594.
a See Supporting Information for details. b Isolated yield. c Determined by
chiral HPLC analysis. d Conversion yield was shown in parentheses.
and the P-C bond formation proceeded slowly at -20 °C (entries 1,
2). In contrast, other bases, with which the existence of the phosphite
anion was detected, enabled a considerably faster reaction even at -78
°C (entries 3-5). Among these, in situ generated iminophosphorane
2a turned out to be the most reactive catalyst, and fortunately, the
desired R-hydroxy phosphonate was obtained with 85% ee.23 It should
be emphasized that an electronic effect of the aromatic substitutions
(Ar) was observed, particularly on its catalytic activity (entries 5-8).
While the reaction with 2b prepared from 1b possessing electron-
withdrawing functionality required 4 h for completion, large accelera-
tion was induced with increasing the electron density of the aryl
groups.24 The most enantioselective catalyst 2c was then used for
further experiments. Catalyst loading can be reduced to 1 mol%, and
the prominent reactivity of the phosphonium phosphite made it feasible
to perform the reaction at -98 °C, where the reaction product was
isolated almost quantitatively with excellent enantioselectivity (entries
9, 10).
(5) (a) Pudovik, A. N. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1950, 73, 499. (b) Pudovik,
A. N.; Kitaev, Y. P. Zh. Obshch. Khim. 1952, 22, 467. (c) Wozniak, L.;
Chojnowski, J. Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 2465.
(6) Merino, P.; Marque´s-Lo´pez, E.; Herrera, R. P. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2008,
350, 1195.
(7) Bifunctional heterobimetallic catalysis: (a) Yokomatsu, T.; Yamagishi, T.;
Shibuya, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993, 4, 1783. (b) Rath, N. P.; Spilling,
C. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 227. (c) Arai, T.; Bougauchi, M.; Sasai,
H.; Shibasaki, M. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 2926. (d) Yokomatsu, T.;
Yamagishi, T.; Shibuya, S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 1527. (e)
Sasai, H.; Bougauchi, M.; Arai, T.; Shibasaki, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997,
38, 2717.
(8) Selected examples of Lewis acid catalysis: (a) Yokomatsu, T.; Yamagishi,
T.; Shibuya, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993, 4, 1779. (b) Nixon, T. D.;
Dalgarno, S.; Ward, C. V.; Jiang, M.; Halcrow, M. A.; Kilner, C.; Thornton-
Pett, M.; Kee, T. P. C. R. Chimie 2004, 7, 809. (c) Saito, B.; Egami, H.;
Katsuki, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1978. (d) Zhou, X.; Liu, X.;
Yang, X.; Shang, D.; Xin, J.; Feng, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
392. (e) Gou, S.; Zhou, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, X.; Feng, X. Tetrahedron 2008,
64, 2864. See also ref 6.
(9) Abell, J. P.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10521.
(10) Yang, F.; Zhao, D.; Lan, J.; Xi, P.; Yang, L.; Xiang, S.; You, J. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 5646.
(11) (a) Wynberg, H.; Smaardijk, A. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 5899. (b)
Smaardijk, A. A.; Noorda, S.; van Bolhuis, F.; Wynberg, H. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1985, 26, 493.
(12) Uraguchi, D.; Sakaki, S.; Ooi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12392.
(13) Chiral triaminoiminophophoranes in catalysis: (a) Brunel, J. M.; Legrand,
O.; Reymond, S.; Buono, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5807. (b)
Sauthier, M.; Fornie´s-Ca´mer, J.; Toupet, L.; Re´au, R. Organometallics 2000,
19, 553. See also: Naka, H.; Kanase, N.; Ueno, M.; Kondo, Y. Chem.sEur.
J. 2008, 14, 5267.
Finally, the generality of this 2c-catalyzed, highly efficient, and
enantioselective hydrophosphonylation was investigated. As listed
in Table 2, a series of aromatic aldehydes with substituents having
Table 2. Substrate Scopea
(14) See Supporting Information for details of the NMR experiment.
(15) Acidity of dialkyl phosphonates: Li, J.-N.; Liu, L.; Fu, Y.; Guo, Q.-X.
Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 4453.
time yieldb eec
(h) (%) (%) entry
time yieldb eec
(h) (%) (%)
entry
R1
R1
(16) Olmstead, W. N.; Margolin, Z.; Bordwell, F. G. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 3295.
(17) (a) Daasch, L. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 5301. (b) Moedritzer, K.
J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1961, 22, 19.
1
2
3
4
5
o-F-C6H4
3
4
4
8
3
97 98
98 96
97 97
99 94
6
7
8
9
m-Br-C6H4
1-naphthyl
2-furyl
6.5 98 98
o-Me-C6H4
p-F-C6H4
3
2
96 99
90 98
90 96
99 91
d
(18) Rodima, T.; Kaljurand, I.; Pihl, A.; Ma¨emets, V.; Leito, I.; Koppel, I. A.
J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 1873, and references therein.
p-MeO-C6H4
p-Me-C6H4
(E)-PhCHdCH 13
91 96 10 Ph(CH2)2
6
(19) The pKa values of DBU and TBD in MeCN were 24.3 and 26.0,
respectively. See: Kaljurand, I.; Ku¨tt, A.; Soova¨li, L.; Rodima, T.; Ma¨emets,
V.; Leito, I.; Koppel, I. A. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 1019.
a-c See footnotes in Table 1. d The reaction was performed at -78 °C.
(20) Schwesinger, R.; Schlemper, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 1167.
(21) The signal corresponding to the anionic species was detectable in DMF
at -60 °C. See Supporting Information for details.
different electronic properties were employable (entries 1-7). In
the case of 2-furylaldehyde, a smooth reaction and virtually
complete stereocontrol were achieved at -78 °C (entry 8).
Moreover, the present system tolerated R,ꢀ-unsaturated as well as
aliphatic aldehydes (entries 9, 10).
(22) The peak area of anionic phosphite corresponds to that of 1a.
(23) The origin of the higher efficiency of 2 than that of TBD is unclear at present.
(24) For the effect of the aromatic substituents of 2 on its ability of generating
a phosphite anion, see the 31P NMR analysis in the Supporting Information.
JA810043D
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 11, 2009 3837