with 70% H2O2 and only applicable to aldehydes),3g as the
catalyst. Ce(NH4)2(NO3)6 (CAN),3h I2,3i and methyltri-
oxorhenium3j (MTO, prepared from Re2O7) have also been
utilized to promote such transformations. However, as
noted3k by Ghorai and Dussault, none of these methods are
mild enough to be generally applicablesthey all suffer from
one or more of such drawbacks as low yields, slow reactions,
requirement for use of high concentration of H2O2, and
incompatibility with sensitive functionalities.
The recent mild/highly efficient Re2O7 protocol of
Dussault3k does represent a major improvement. However,
new mild/effective methods directly applicable to multifunc-
tionalized substrates are still in great need.
seemed less reactive, and clear-cut discrimination between
two types of ketone carbonyl groups was achieved (entry
12).
Open-chain ketones showed similar reactivity under the
same conditions, resulting in the expected gem-dihydroper-
oxides in excellent yields (entries 13-15). It is interesting
to note that 1,3-dioxolanes, which are more practical protect-
ing groups than those dimethyl ketals, also served very well
as the precursors (entries 16-18). Compared with all the
previous acid-catalyzed protocols, which were effective only
with ketals (mostly dimethyl ones) unless using substantial
amounts of strong acids, the present method should have
better prospects in application.
In our efforts to develop new antimalarial organic perox-
ides, we observed that phosphomolybdic acid (PMA,
H3Mo12O40P·xH2O, a reagent much cheaper than Re2O7) in
ethereal H2O2 could efficiently catalyze the peroxyketal-
ization reaction of ketones/ketals (Scheme 1). The reaction
That common protecting groups such as TBS (tert-
butyldimethylsilyl), MOM (methoxymethyl), PMB (p-meth-
oxybenzyl), Bn (benzyl), and Bz (benzoyl) groups were
tolerated is particularly valuable because construction of gem-
peroxides by direct peroxy ketalization of ketone/ketals
containing common protecting groups in synthetically useful
yields has never been achieved before (to the best of our
knowledge), and there has been only one3d individual
example for olefinic substrates.
4
Scheme 1
As a direct comparison, we also tested conversion of 5f
3e
to 6f under the NaHSO4-SiO2 conditions. No traces of
gem-diperoxides could be detected after 2 h, while the TBS
protecting group was completely hydrolyzed. Similarly, in
an earlier effort to prepare a gem-dihydroperoxide from a
dimethyl ketal using 20 mol % of F3B·OEt2 as the catalyst,
the expected product was formed in 10-40% yield, along
with 35-77% of the corresponding ketone which resulted
from hydrolysis.
In conclusion, a novel mild method using 2-5 mol % of
phosphomolybdic acid (PMA) as the catalyst has been
developed for the synthesis of gem-diperoxides. The lower
acidity and higher catalytic activity of this set of conditions
made it possible for the first time to make gem-diperoxyketals
directly from the ketones/ketals containing such protecting
groups as TBS, MOM, PMB, Bn, and Bz and/or C-C
double5 bonds. The yields are generally high, and the reaction
time in most cases is 3-4 h. 1,3-Dioxolanes, which are
broadly employed protecting groups and might be necessary
usually occurred readily at ambient temperature in the
presence of 0.02-0.05 mol equiv (i.e., 2-5 mol %) of PMA
and resulted in the desired gem-diperoxides in excellent
yields within a few hours.
The results are summarized in Table 1. Cyclic ketones of
different ring sizes all reacted very well (entries 1-3).
Bridged and substituted ketones (entries 4-6 and 9) appeared
to be equally reactive. It is interesting to note that even when
the carbonyl groups were masked as 1,3-dioxolanes, which
usually are more stable/less reactive than dimethyl ketals (the
substrates in some of the previous investigations) and
therefore are more often used as protecting groups, the gem-
peroxides were also formed in high yields.
(3) (a) Ledaal, T.; Solbjor, T. Acta Chem. Scand. 1967, 21, 1658–1659.
(b) Ramirez, A.; Woerpel, K. A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4617–4620. (c)
Terent’ev, A. O.; Platonov, M. M.; Ogibin, Y. N.; Nikishin, G. I. Synth.
Commun. 2007, 37, 1281–1287. (d) Jefford, C. W.; Li, Y.; Jaber, A.;
Boukouvalas, J. Synth. Commun. 1990, 20, 2589–2596. (e) Das, B.;
Veeranjaneyulu, B.; Krishnaiah, M.; Balasubramanyam, P. J. Mol. Catal.
A 2008, 284, 116–119. (f) Terent’ev, A. O.; Kutkin, A. V.; Platonov, M. M.;
Ogibin, Y. N.; Nikishin, G. I. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 7359–7363. (g)
Bunge, A.; Hamann, H.-J.; Liebscher, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 524–
526. (h) Das, B.; Krishnaiah, M.; Veeranjaneyulu, B.; Ravikanth, B.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 6286–6289. (i) Zmitek, K.; Zupan, M.; Stavber,
S.; Iskra, J. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2491–2494. (j) Iskra, J.; Bonnet-Delponb,
D.; Be´gue´, J.-P. Tetrrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 6309–6312. (k) Ghorai, P.;
Dussault, P. H. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4577–4579. (l) Zmitek, K.; Zupana,
M.; Iskra, J. Org. Biomol. Chem 2007, 5, 3895–3908. (a review). (m)
Ghorai, P.; Dussault, P. H. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 213–216.
When a free ketone and a ketal functionality are both
present in the same molecule, further reactions might follow
(entries 10 and 11), leading to also interesting and potentially
useful cyclic structures. The conjugated carbonyl group
(2) (a) Kim, H.-S.; Tsuchiya, K.; Shibata, Y.; Wataya, Y.; Ushigoe, Y.;
Masuyama, A.; Nojima, M.; McCullough, K. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1999, 1867–1870. (b) Hamada, Y.; Tokuhara, H.; Masuyama, A.; Nojima,
M.; Kim, H.-S.; Ono, K.; Ogura, N.; Wataya, Y. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45,
1374–1378. (c) Kim, H.-S.; Nagai, Y.; Ono, K.; Begum, K.; Wataya, Y.;
Hamada, Y.; Tsuchiya, K.; Masuyama, A.; Nojima, M.; McCullough, K. J.
J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 2357–2361. (d) Vennerstrom, J. L.; Dong, Y.;
Andersen, S. L.; Ager, A. L., Jr.; Fu, H.-n.; Miller, R. E.; Wesche, D. L.;
Kyle, D. E.; Gerena, L.; Walters, S. M.; Wood, J. K.; Edwards, G.; Holme,
A. D.; McLean, W. G.; Milhous, W. K. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 2753–
2758. (e) Tsuchiya, K.; Hamada, Y.; Masuyama, A.; Nojima, M. Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 1999, 40, 4077–4080. (f) Dong, Y.; Matile, H.; Chollet, J.;
Kaminsky, R.; Wood, J. K.; Vennerstrom, J. L. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42,
1477–1480. (g) Kim, H. S.; Tsuchiya, K.; Shibata, Y.; Wataya, Y.; Ushigoe,
Y.; Masuyama, A.; Nojima, M.; McCullough, K. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1999, 1867–1870.
(4) (a) Saito, I.; Nagata, R.; Yuba, K.; Matsuura, T. Tetrahedron Lett.
1983, 24, 1737–1740. (b) Terent’ev, A. O.; Krylov, I. B.; Borisov, D. A.;
Nikishin, G. I. Synthesis 2007, 2979–2986. (c) Liu, Y.-H.; Zhang, Z.-H.;
Li, T.-S. Synthesis 2008, 3314–3318. (d) Ref 3d. For modification made in
this work, see the Supporting Information.
(5) The only exception was found in ref 3d (a compound similar to 5r
but without the aromatic ring and the oxygen in the six-membered ring).
1616
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 7, 2009