NoVel Aminoglycoside (NB54)
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2009, Vol. 52, No. 9 2843
) 4.0, J2 ) 10.0 Hz, H-2), 3.45 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 9.5, J2 ) 10.5 Hz,
H-4), 3.76-3.83 (m, 2H, H-6, H-6′), 3.92 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 9.0, J2 )
10.5 Hz, H-3), 3.97-4.00 (m, 1H, H-5), 5.65 (d, 1H, J ) 3.5 Hz,
H-1); “Ring II” δH 1.55 (ddd, 1H, J1 ) J2 ) J3 ) 12.5 Hz, H-2ax),
2.18 (dt, 1H, J1 ) 4.0, J2 ) 13.0 Hz, H-2eq), 3.36 (dd, 1H, J1 )
J2 ) 9.0 Hz, H-6), 3.42-3.48 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.50 (dd, 1H, J1 ) J2
) 9.0 Hz, H-4), 3.54 (dd, 1H, J1 ) J2 ) 9.0 Hz, H-5), 3.77-3.83
(m, 1H, H-1). The additional peaks in the spectrum were identified
as follows: 1.82-1.88 (m, 1H, H-9), 2.01-2.07 (m, 1H, H-9), 3.46
(dd, 2H, J1 ) 6.5 J2 )7.5, H-10), 4.16 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 4.0, J2 ) 8.5,
H-8). 13C NMR (125 MHz, MeOD) “Ring I” δC 61.0 (C-6), 63.6
(C-2), 70.6 (C-4), 71.3 (C-3), 72.8 (C-5), 98.3 (C-1); “Ring II” δC
32.3 (C-2), 49.1 (C-1), 60.2 (C-3), 74.6 (C-6), 77.4 (C-5), 79.7
(C-4). The additional peaks in the spectrum were identified as
follows: 33.6 (C9), 47.4 (C10), 69.0 (C8), 175.7 (C7). MALDI-
TOF MS calcd for C16H26N10O9 K ([M + K]+) m/e 541.2; measured
m/e 541.1).
(d, 1H, J ) 4.0 Hz, H-1); “Ring II” δH 1.47 (ddd, 1H, J1 ) J2 )
J3 ) 12.5 Hz, H-2ax), 2.50 (dt, 1H, J1 ) 4.0, J2 ) 13.0 Hz, H-2eq),
3.56-3.58 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.72 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 8.5, J2 ) 9.5 Hz,
H-4), 3.99 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 8.5, J2 ) 9.5 Hz, H-5), 4.01-4.08 (m,
1H, H-1), 4.91 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 9.5, J2 ) 10.5 Hz, H-6), 6.64 (d, 1H,
J ) 8.5 Hz, NH); “Ring III” δH 3.57 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 6.0, J2 ) 13.0
Hz, H-5′), 3.64 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 3.0, J2 ) 13.0 Hz, H-5), 4.50-4.55
(m, 1H, H-4), 5.49 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 5.0, J2 ) 7.0 Hz, H-3), 5.62 (dd,
1H, J1 ) 1.0, J2 ) 5.0 Hz, H-2), 5.68 (d, 1H, J ) 1.0 Hz, H-1).
The additional peaks in the spectrum were identified as follows:
2.00-2.15 (m, 2H, H-9), 2.04 (s, 3H, Ac), 2.09 (s, 6H, 2Ac), 2.20
(s, 3H, Ac), 2.23 (s, 3H, Ac), 3.35 (t, 2H, J ) 7.0, H-10), 5.16 (dd,
1H, J1 ) 5.0, J2 ) 7.0, H-8), 7.33 (t, 2H, J ) 8.0, Bz), 7.43 (t, 2H,
J ) 8.0, Bz), 7.51-7.54 (m, 1H, Bz), 7.56-7.60 (m, 1H, Bz), 7.85
(dd, 2H, J ) 1.0, 7.5, Bz), 7.94 (dd, 2H, J ) 1.0, 7.5, Bz). 13C
NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) “Ring I” δC 61.6 (C-2), 61.8 (C-6), 68.1
(C-5), 68.2 (C-4), 70.7 (C-3), 96.8 (C-1); “Ring II” δC 32.1 (C-2),
48.4 (C-1), 58.5 (C-3), 73.5 (C-6), 77.9 (C-4), 80.0 (C-5); “Ring
III” δC 52.7 (C-2), 71.5 (C-3), 74.7 (C-2), 80.1 (C-4), 107.4 (C-
1). The additional peaks in the spectrum were identified as follows:
20.6-20.9 (Ac, 5C), 30.5 (C-9), 47.1 (C-10), 70.9 (C8), 128.4 (Bz,
2C), 128.5 (Bz, 2C), 129.6 (Bz, 2C), 129.7 (Bz, 2C), 133.6 (Bz,
1C), 133.7 (Bz, 1C), 165.2 (Bz, CO), 165.2 (Bz, CO), 168.9 (C-8,
CO), 169.7 (Ac, CO), 169.7 (C-7, CO), 169.9 (Ac, CO), 170.6 (Ac,
3′,4′,6′,6-Tetra-O-acetyl-2′,3-diazido-1-N-[(S)-4-azido-2-O-acetyl-
butanoyl]paromamine (6). Compound 5 (3.0 g, 5.85 mmol) was
dissolved in dry pyridine (10 mL), cooled at -12 °C, and then
acetic anhydride (5.4 equiv, 3.0 mL, 31.80 mmol) was added. The
reaction temperature was kept at -12 °C, and the reaction progress
was monitored by TLC (EtOAc/hexane 7:3), which indicated
completion after 8 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc
(100 mL) and extracted with aqueous solution of HCl (2%),
saturated aqueous NaHCO3, and brine. The combined organic layer
was dried over MgSO4 and concentrated. The crude product was
purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 2:3) to afford 6
CO), 172.3 (Ac, CO). MALDI-TOF MS calcd for C45H51N13O19
K
([M + K]+) m/e 1116.3; measured m/e 1116.3.
5-O-(5-Amino-5-deoxy-ꢀ-D-ribofuranosyl)-1-N-[(S)-4-amino-2-
hydroxy-butanoyl]paromamine (2). Compound 8 (1.55 g, 1.44
mmol) was treated with a solution of MeNH2 (33% solution in
EtOH, 50 mL) and the reaction progress was monitored by TLC
(EtOAc/MeOH 85:15), which indicated completion after 8 h. The
reaction mixture was evaporated to dryness and the residue was
dissolved in a mixture of THF (5 mL) and aqueous NaOH (1 mM,
5.0 mL). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 10 min,
after which PMe3 (1 M solution in THF, 11.52 mL, 11.52 mmol)
was added. The reaction progress was monitored by TLC [CH2Cl2/
MeOH/H2O/MeNH2 (33% solution in EtOH) 10:15:6:15], which
indicated completion after 1 h. The product was purified by flash
chromatography on a short column of silica gel. The column was
washed with the following solvents: THF (800 mL), CH2Cl2 (800
mL), EtOH (200 mL), and MeOH (400 mL). The product was then
eluted with a mixture of 20% MeNH2 (33% solution in EtOH) in
80% MeOH. Fractions containing the product were combined and
evaporated to dryness. The residue was redissolved in a small
volume of water and evaporated again (2-3 repeats) to afford the
free amine form of 2. The analytically pure product was obtained
by passing the above product through a short column of Amberlite
1
(3.15 g, 75% yield). H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): “Ring I” δH
3.70 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 3.0, J2 ) 11.0 Hz, H-2), 4.10 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 2.0,
J2 ) 12.5 Hz, H-6), 4.31 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 4.5, J2 ) 12.5 Hz, H-6′),
4.36-4.39 (m, 1H, H-5), 5.05 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 10.0, J2 ) 10.0 Hz,
H-4), 5.28 (d, 1H, J ) 3.5 Hz, H-1) 5.50 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 10.0, J2 )
10.0 Hz, H-3); “Ring II” δH 1.48 (ddd, 1H, J1 ) J2 ) J3 ) 12.5
Hz, H-2ax), 2.50 (dt, 1H, J1 ) 4.0, J2 ) 13.0 Hz, H-2eq), 3.34-3.39
(m, 1H, H-4), 3.38-3.43 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.74-3.78 (m, 1H, H-5),
3.99-4.04 (m, 1H, H-1), 4.82 (dd, 1H, J1 ) J2 ) 10.0 Hz, H-6),
6.63 (d, 1H, J ) 7.5 Hz, NH). The additional peaks in the spectrum
were identified as follows: 2.05-2.09 (m, 2H, H-9), 2.05 (s, 3H,
Ac), 2.08 (s, 3H, Ac), 2.09 (s, 3H, Ac), 2.15 (s, 3H, Ac), 2.19 (s,
3H, Ac), 3.35-3.38 (m, 2H, H-10), 5.14 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 5.5, J2 )
6.5, H-8). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) “Ring I” δC 61.8 (C-6),
61.8 (C-2), 68.1 (C-4), 68.4 (C-5), 71.4 (C-3), 99.1 (C-1); “Ring
II” δC 32.5 (C-2), 48.2 (C-1), 58.2 (C-3), 73.8 (C-5), 74.0 (C-6),
84.3 (C-4). The additional peaks in the spectrum were identified
as follows: 20.6-20.9 (Ac, 5C), 30.5 (C-9), 47.1 (C-10), 70.8 (C8),
169.1 (C-8, CO), 169.8 (Ac, CO), 169.8 (C-7, CO), 170.0 (Ac,
CO), 170.6 (Ac, CO), 172.4 (Ac, CO). MALDI-TOF MS calcd for
C26H36N10O14 K ([M + K]+) m/e 751.2; measured m/e 751.1).
5-O-(5-Azido-2,3-O-dibenzoyl-5-deoxy-ꢀ-D-ribofuranosyl)-3′,4′,6′,6-
tetra-O-acetyl-2′,3-diazido-1-N-[(S)-4-azido-2-O-acetyl-butanoyl]pa-
romamine (8). Anhydrous CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was added to a
powdered, flame-dried 4 Å molecular sieves (3.0 g), followed by
the addition of the acceptor (compound 6, 1.75 g, 2.46 mmol) and
the donor (compound 7, 5-deoxy-5-azido-2,3-di-O-benzoyl-1-O-
trichloroacetimido-D-ribofuranose)15 (3.3 g, 6.27 mmol) dissolved
in CH3CN (10 mL). The mixture was stirred for 10 min at room
temperature and was then cooled to -20 °C. A catalytic amount
of BF3-Et2O (100 µL) was added, and the mixture was stirred at
-15 °C. The reaction progress was monitored by TLC (EtOAc/
hexane 3:2), which indicated the completion after 30 min. The
reaction was diluted with CH2Cl2 and filtered through celite. After
thorough washing of the celite with CH2Cl2, the washes were
combined and extracted with saturated aqueous NaHCO3, brine,
dried over MgSO4, and concentrated. The crude product was
purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 2:3) to afford
+
CG50 (NH4 form). The column was first washed with a mixture
of MeOH/H2O (3:2), then the product was eluted with a mixture
of MeOH/H2O/NH4OH (80:10:10) to afford compound 2 (628 mg,
78% yield).
For the storage and biological tests, 2 was converted to its sulfate
salt form: the free base was dissolved in water, the pH was adjusted
1
to 6.5 with H2SO4 (0.1 N) and lyophilized. H NMR (500 MHz,
D2O, pD 3.5) “Ring I” δH 3.52 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 4.0, J2 ) 11.0 Hz,
H-2), 3.53-3.57 (m, 1H, H-4), 3.81-3.85 (m, 1H, H-5), 3.81-3.85
(m, 1H, H-6), 3.93-3.98 (m, 1H, H-6′), 4.04 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 9.0, J2
) 10.0 Hz, H-3), 5.87 (d, 1H, J ) 4.0 Hz, H-1); “Ring II” δH
1.80 (ddd, 1H, J1 ) J2 ) J3 ) 12.5 Hz, H-2ax), 2.24 (dt, 1H, J1 )
4.0, J2 ) 12.5 Hz, H-2eq), 3.54-3.58 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.73 (dd, 1H,
J1 ) J2 ) 9.5 Hz, H-6), 3.92-3.98 (m, 1H, H-1), 3.99 (dd, 1H, J1
) J2 ) 9.0 Hz, H-5), 4.11 (dd, 1H, J1 ) J2 ) 9.5 Hz, H-4); “Ring
III” δH 3.29 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 7.0, J2 ) 13.5 Hz, H-5), 3.42 (dd, 1H,
J1 ) 4.0, J2 ) 13.5 Hz, H-5′), 4.12-4.15 (m, 1H, H-4), 4.23-4.25
(m, 1H, H-3), 4.26-4.29 (m, 1H, H-2), 5.40 (s, 1H, H-1). The
additional peaks in the spectrum were identified as follows:
1.98-2.06 (m, 1H, H-9), 2.15-2.22 (m, 1H, H-9), 3.14-3.23 (m,
2H, H-10), 4.34 (dd, 1H, J1) 4.0, J2 ) 8.5, H-8). 13C NMR (125
MHz, D2O) “Ring I” δC 55.4 (C-2), 61.9 (C-6), 70.8 (C-3), 70.8
(C-4), 75.8 (C-5), 95.7 (C-1); “Ring II” δC 31.4 (C-2), 50.4 (C-3),
51.4 (C-1), 74.6 (C-6), 78.1 (C-4), 85.1 (C-5); “Ring III” δC 43.4
1
compound 8 (2.01 g, 76% yield). H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3):
“Ring I” δH 3.53 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 4.0, J2 ) 11.0 Hz, H-2), 4.15 (dd,
1H, J1 ) 2.0, J2 ) 12.5 Hz, H-6), 4.26 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 4.0, J2 )
12.5 Hz, H-6′), 4.50-4.55 (m, 1H, H-5), 5.07 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 9.5, J2
) 10.0 Hz, H-4), 5.43 (dd, 1H, J1 ) 9.5, J2 ) 10.0 Hz, H-3), 5.83