Table 1 Photovoltaic performances of 1 and 2 as active layersa
Compd
Jsc/nA mÀ2
linc/nm
IPCE (%)
Voc/V
FF
Z (%)
1
2
204
25
470
460
5.5
0.67
0.46
0.22
0.27
0.26
0.25
0.014
a
Upon illumination with 10-mW cmÀ2 monochromatic light.
In summary, the dendritic oligothiophene bearing PDI units
at the terminal positions has been synthesized, and its proper-
ties and photovoltaic characteristics were revealed. Compari-
son between the devices based on 1 and 2 clearly demonstrates
that the structural modification of p-conjugated system has a
major impact on the performance. Our finding provides a
strategy for the development of new materials in photovoltaic
device application. Further study for the elucidation of
structure–photovoltaic property relationship will be reported
in due course.
T. M. Figueira-Duarte, A. Ge
´
Commun., 2007, 109–119; G. Ferna
M. M. Wienk, C. Atienza, D. M. Guldi, R. A. J. Janssen and
N. Martin, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 3189–3196.
4 N. Negishi, K. Yamada, K. Takimiya, Y. Aso, T. Otsubo and
Y. Harima, Chem. Lett., 2003, 32, 404–405; N. Negishi,
K. Takimiya, T. Otsubo, Y. Harima and Y. Aso, Chem. Lett.,
2004, 33, 654–655; N. Negishi, K. Takimiya, T. Otsubo, Y. Harima
and Y. Aso, Synth. Met., 2005, 152, 125–128; H. Kanato,
M. Narutaki, K. Takimiya, T. Otsubo and Y. Harima, Chem.
Lett., 2006, 35, 668–669.
gout and J.-F. Nierengarten, Chem.
ndez, L. Sanchez, D. Veldman,
´
´
5 J. Cremer, E. Mena-Osteritz, N. G. Pschierer, K. Mullen and
¨
P. Bauerle, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2005, 3715–3723.
¨
P. Bauerle, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2005, 3, 985–995; J. Cremer and
The authors acknowledge Dr H. Kajii and Prof. Y. Ohmori at
the Center for Advanced Science and Innovation, Osaka Univ.,
for AFM analysis. Thanks are given to the MAC, ISIR, for
assistance in obtaining elemental analyses. This work was
supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Nos.
19022019, 20027011, and 20108004) from the Ministry of Educa-
tion, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan, and the
Industrial Technology Research Grant Program in 2008 from the
New Energy and Industrial Technology Developing Organiza-
tion (NEDO) of Japan, and also supported by the Cooperative
Research with Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
¨
6 A. Petrella, J. Cremer, L. De Cola, P. Bauerle and R. M. Williams,
¨
J. Phys. Chem. A, 2005, 109, 11687–11695; J. Cremer and
P. Bauerle, J. Mater. Chem., 2006, 16, 874–884.
¨
7 X. Zhan, Z. Tan, B. Domercq, Z. An, X. Zhang, S. Barlow, Y. Li,
D. Zhu, B. Kippelen and S. R. Marder, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007,
129, 7246–7247.
8 N. Negishi, Y. Ie, M. Taniguchi, T. Kawai, H. Tada, T. Kaneda
and Y. Aso, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 829–832.
9 N. Negishi, Y. Ie, H. Tada, T. Kaneda and Y. Aso, Chem. Lett.,
2007, 36, 544–545.
10 K. Petritsch, J. J. Dittmer, E. A. Marseglia and R. H. Friend, Sol.
Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2000, 61, 63–72; J. J. Dittmer,
E. A. Marseglia and R. H. Friend, Adv. Mater., 2000, 12,
1270–1274.
Notes and references
11 L. Schmidt-Mende, A. Fechtenkotter, K. Mullen, E. Moons,
¨
¨
R. H. Friend and J. D. MacKenzie, Science, 2001, 293, 1119–1122.
12 J. P. Parrish, V. L. Flanders, R. Y. Floyd and K. W. Jung,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42, 7729–7731.
1 (a) S. Gunes, H. Neugebauer and N. S. Sariciftci, Chem. Rev.,
´
chet,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 58–77.
2 K. M. Coakley and M. D. McGehee, Chem. Mater., 2004, 16,
4533–4542.
¨
2007, 107, 1324–1338; (b) B. C. Thompson and J. M. J. Fre
13 Both active layers showed amorphous morphology on AFM
measurements as shown in Fig. S4 in ESIw.
14 The best results among three devices for each compound are
summarized in Table 1. For details of photovoltaic performances,
see Table S1 in ESIw.
3 J.-F. Nierengarten, New J. Chem., 2004, 28, 1177–1191;
J. L. Segura, N. Martin and D. M. Guldi, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2005, 34, 31–47; J. Roncali, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2005, 34, 483–495;
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
Chem. Commun., 2009, 1213–1215 | 1215