.
Angewandte
Communications
metalations proceed generally in a Markovnikov fashion[13]
and preferentially place the metal at the least substituted
carbon atom. Thus, besides the ring size formed, the
regioselectivity of the cyclization should be expected to
depend strongly on the olefin substitution pattern. Ideally,
suitable steering ligands would be able to override both of
these intrinsic substrate controls and allow predictable
switching between endo- and exo-cyclization modes
(Scheme 1). Intrigued by the perspective of an efficient and
versatile access to 1,6-annulated 2-pyridones suitable for
concise assembly of pyridone natural products, we decided to
investigate the nickel(0)-catalyzed intramolecular hydroary-
lation in greater detail. Herein, we report our findings using
different ligand sets to fully control and to effect selectively
either exo or endo cyclization during the olefin hydrometa-
lation step.
good yield, thus surpassing the efficiency of the reaction with
a phosphine (entry 5). Other aluminum-based Lewis acids
like AlEt3 or MAD[15] were inefficient as cocatalysts (entries 6
and 7). Although [Ni(cod)2] is an efficient cyclization catalyst,
phosphine/nickel(0) complexes also deliver competent cata-
lytic species, as [(Cy3P)2Ni(C2H4)][16] displayed similar reac-
tivity to that of the [Ni(cod)2]/phosphine combinations
(entry 8). Importantly, the selectivity mode of the cyclization
completely switched when using an N-heterocyclic carbene
(NHC) ligand (IMes) under otherwise identical reaction
conditions (entry 9). The preformed complex [IMes2Ni][17]
performed similarly to the in situ [Ni(cod)2]/IMes combina-
tion, thus indicating little contribution of cod ligand to the
catalytic activity in this case (entry 10). The bulkier IPr ligand
afforded a higher overall reaction yield albeit with a margin-
ally lower selectivity (entry 11). Both parameters could be
improved in the presence of MAD (entry 12). Interestingly,
the usage of saturated analogue SIPr led to a significant
erosion of the selectivity and drop in the yield (entry 13).
With the two sets of reaction conditions for a powerful
switch between endo/exo cyclization modes, the scope of the
cyclization was evaluated (Table 2). Notably, exclusive for-
mation of either product 2 or 3 could be attained for all the
substrates 1 independent of their structure. For some instan-
ces, slight fine-tuning of the reaction conditions was required
to enhance the selectivity. The deuterated 6-D-pyridone 1b
underwent complete deuterium transfer to the methyl group
of 2b in the exo-cyclization mode and to the methylene group
of 3b in the endo-cyclization mode. These findings strongly
We initiated our studies with the cyclization of the
pyridone 1a bearing an unbiased 1,2-disubstituted double
bond (Table 1). Monodentate phosphine ligands provided
Table 1: Optimization of the regiodivergent cyclization.[a]
Entry
Ligand[b]
Lewis acid
Yield [%][c]
2a/3a[c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
(iPr)3P
(tBu)3P
Cy3P
(Cy2PCH2)2
–
–
AlMe3
AlMe3
AlMe3
AlMe3
AlMe3
AlEt3
70
68
70
0
83 (80)
0
>95:5
>95:5
>95:5
–
>95:5
–
À
support the C6 H nickel(0) insertion/hydroarylation mecha-
nism suggested by Nakao, Hiyama, and co-workers.[8] More-
over, the absence of any deuterium scrambling indicates an
irreversible hydroarylation step. The exo cyclization of 1c,
bearing an existing stereogenic center in the tether, provided
the more stable trans-product 2c with a 4:1 selectivity. Most
substrates bearing 1,2-disubstitited double bonds were effi-
ciently transformed through both cyclization modes, thus
affording the corresponding pyridones 2d–f and 3d–f. Inter-
estingly, trans-1d showed a higher reactivity than the corre-
sponding cis-1d (entries 3 and 4), despite the presumed
higher affinity of the latter to the metal center.[18] The
pyridone 1 f underwent smooth cyclizations in both modes to
give the cis-fused tricycle 2 f as well as the bridged tricycle 3 f
(entry 6). The related N-Boc-containing substrate 1g worked
efficiently in the exo mode, but failed to give the endo-
cyclization product, probably because of the bulk of the N-
Boc moiety (entry 7). The substrate 1h, containing a 1,1-
dialkyl-substituted olefin, smoothly delivered the endo-prod-
uct 3h. In this case, the exo cyclization was not possible, and is
likely to be the result of the congested nickelacycle with the
metal at the tertiary carbon atom.[19] Along the same lines,
trialkyl-substituted olefins (1i and 1j) are competent as long
as it does not involve a nickel/tertiary carbon organometallic
intermediate (entries 8 and 9). In contrast, the formation of
quaternary carbon centers is possible with aryl-substituted
olefins (entries 11–14), thus indicating a stabilization via a h3-
benzylic-nickel intermediate.[8,20] The endo cyclization of 1n
produced the trans-product 3n in moderate diastereoselec-
tivity (entry 14). The minor cis isomer is probably formed
7
–
MAD
0
–
8
9
10
11
12
13
(Cy3P)2Ni(C2H4)
AlMe3
AlMe3
AlMe3
AlMe3
MAD
68
70
63
77 (70)
81 (74)
55
>95:5
>5:95
>5:95
6:94
>5:95
15:85
IMes
IMes2Ni
IPr
IPr
SIPr
AlMe3
[a] 0.10 mmol of 1a, 10 mol% [Ni(cod)2], 40 mol% LA, toluene (0.4 mL),
808C for 24 h. [b] 25 mol% monodentate phosphine, 15 mol% bidentate
phosphine or NHC, 10 mol% nickel complex. [c] Determined by 1H NMR
spectroscopy using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard.
Yield of isolated product given within parentheses. LA=Lewis acid,
MAD=see Ref. [15].
excellent exo selectivity in the reaction of 1a (entries 1–3)
with [Ni(cod)2] as a metal source and AlMe3 as Lewis acid.[8]
Surprisingly, the yield of 2a was almost independent of the
phosphine structure. Moreover, the bidentate ligand
[(Cy2PCH2)2] completely inhibited the reaction (entry 4).
This observation prompted us to investigate whether [Ni-
(cod)2] might be solely responsible for the reactivity. The
Lewis acid present in the reaction might potentially bind the
free phosphine resulting from dissociation[14] of the initially
formed nickel(0) complex, thus shifting the equilibrium to
[Ni(cod)2]. Indeed, omitting the phosphine ligand in the
reaction exclusively delivered the exo product 2a with very
634
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 633 –637