organocatalysts with a high level of enantioselectivity comparable
to that of transition-metal-mediated systems, enabling the highly
enantioselective OKR of a wide range of racemic secondary
alcohols even under mild chemical conditions.5
Figure 2. Panel of chiral AZADOs.
Table 1).10 An initial attempt carried out using catalyst 1, which
has no substituent group, with TCCA11 under -40 °C in CH2Cl2
Table 1. OKR of (()-8 Using a Panel of Chiral AZADOs
The designed motif, namely, 4-aryl-1-alkyl-AZADO, relies
on the generally accepted mechanism of TEMPO-catalyzed
alcohol oxidation proposed by Semmelhack6a and Bobbitt,6c
in which the key feature of the concept consists of the following
two steps: (1) addition of the substrate to the oxoammonium
species and (2) H-abstraction via a Cope-like planar five-
membered cyclic transition state. Thus, we expected that in the
first stage the cation-π interaction between N+dO and the aryl
group effectively shielded one side of the oxoammonium moiety
to exhibit face selectivity,7,8 and the alkyl group flanking the
nearby catalytic center played an important role in the dis-
crimination of racemic alcohols during the course of the
oxidation (Figure 1).
entry catalyst t [h] convn [%]a ee [%]b config (alcohol)b krel
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
3
52
55
52
38
50
29
55
8
96
S
S
S
S
R
R
S
1.2
32.0
82.2
7.8
11.7
4.5
32.8
3
98
3
41
24
24
3
-70
-23
98
a Conversion was estimated from isolated yields of alcohols. b Determined
by chiral HPLC analysis.
resulted in rapid oxidation with no selectivity (entry 1, kR/kS12
) 1.2). On the other hand, for catalyst 2 with a methyl group,
good selectivity was observed under the same reaction condi-
tions (entry 2), and with the more sterically effective n-Bu type
of catalyst 3 the oxidation proceeded in 52% conversion with
excellent selectivity (entry 3, kR/kS ) 82.2). Additionally, the
configuration of recovered alcohols depended on the position
of the alkyl substituent group (entries 5 and 6), suggesting that
the R-substituent group of chiral AZADO is essential for the
(7) For examples of cation-π interaction, see: (a) Kawabata, T; Nagato,
M.; Takasu, K.; Fuji, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3169–3170. (b) Li,
X.; Liu, P.; Houk, K. N.; Birman, V. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
13836–13837. (c) Ma, J. C.; Dougherty, D. A. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 1303–
1324.
(8) An interesting paper, in which the effects on the π-facial diastereo-
selectivity of the substituent in the 4-position of adamantin-2-one were
investigated, has been reported; see:(a) Barboni, L.; Filippi, A.; Fraschetti,
C.; Giuli, S.; Marcolini, M.; Marcantoni, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49,
6065–6067.
Figure 1. Working hypothesis of OKR catalyzed by chiral AZADO.
(9) In preliminary experiments, chiral AZADO and chiral AZADOH
(its corresponding hydroxylamine), which is a synthetic precursor of chiral
AZADO, afforded similar kR/kS values for OKR. In view of its availability,
we chose the chiral AZADOH catalyst for further study.
(10) See Supporting Information for details of the preparation of the
catalysts and screening for reaction conditions in OKR.
To assess our hypothesis, we synthesized a panel of chiral
AZADOs and their corresponding hydroxylamine catalysts (see
Supporting Information)9 and evaluated their selectivity in OKR
using trans-2-phenyl-cyclohexanol 8 as a substrate (Figure 2,
(11) (a) Luca, L. D.; Giacomelli, G.; Porcheddu, A. Org. Lett. 2001, 3,
3041–3044. (b) Luca, L. D.; Giacomelli, G.; Masala, S.; Porcheddu, A. J.
Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 4999–5001.
(12) For details of kR/kS values, see: (a) Kagan, H. B.; Flaud, J. C. In
Topics in Stereochemistry; Eliel, E. L., Ed.; Wiley & Sons: New York,
1988; Vol. 18, pp 249-330. (b) Vedejs, E.; Jure, M. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 3974–4001.
(5) Osa and Bobbitt reported a highly enantioselective OKR using a
chiral TEMPO (1-azaspiro[5.5]undecane N-oxyl radical) modified electrode
system; however, the chiral TEMPO itself is not applicable to simple
chemical conditions.3c,e
(6) (a) Semmelhack, M. F.; Schmid, C. R.; Cortes, D. S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1986, 27, 1119–1122. (b) de Nooy, A. E. J.; Basemer, A. C.; van
Bekkum, H. Synthesis 1996, 1153–1174. (c) Bobbitt, J. M.; Wiberg, K. B.
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4504–4509, and references therein.
(13) The sterically congested i-Pr group of the catalyst decreased catalytic
activity and enantioselectivity. We consider that flexibility of the substituent
group as normal butyl group is essential for the generation of broad
asymmetric reaction space. This assumption was supported by the fact that
catalyst 2 with a Me group gave low selectivity with other secondary
alcohols (see Supporting Information).
1830
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 8, 2009