1608
R. Zindell et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 1604–1609
Figure 3. In vivo activity of compounds in zymosan induced paw inflammation model. Change in paw swelling of compound or prednisolone dosed mice compared to vehicle
dose mice are represented. Values are mean of six mice per group SEM. *p < 0.001 versus vehicle control.
erated in example 14, leads to compound 24 which has both excel-
lent potency and selectivity.
References and notes
1. Gaoni, Y.; Mechoulam, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 1646.
Based on overall profile, both 7 and 24 were chosen for further
profiling as shown in Table 5. The SAR described has been devel-
oped based on the functional assays, however the binding data is
also collected on selected compounds to confirm the receptor
interaction. Both 3H-CP55940 and 3H-Win55212 are CB1/CB2 dual
agonists which are used in competition assays towards this end.21
Compound 7 shows modest competition against both radiolabeled
ligands whereas 24 competes only against 3H-Win55212. In addi-
tion to competing against only one of the probes, 24 shows a 25
fold loss in binding affinity as compared to 7 suggesting different
binding modes of the two compounds.29 Each of the compounds
is a very potent CB2 agonist based on the functional data with very
good selectivity over CB1. To examine the anti-inflammatory activ-
ity in vivo, an acute rodent inflammation model was used. Swelling
is induced by zymosan and a compounds’ efficacy is assessed by its
ability to inhibit the swelling after an oral dose of compound.30 The
results reported in Figure 3 show compound 7 dosed at 30 mpk
inhibits 54% of paw swelling as compared to vehicle control. Com-
pound 24 dosed at 100 mpk is also efficacious with 85% inhibition
of paw swelling. Both structural classes of compound show very
good potency as CB2 agonists in the functional assay as well as effi-
cacy in a murine model of inflammation.
In summary, by both rigidifying the amino-alcohol 1 to reduce
the entropy of the molecule, and incorporating a linker between
the aryl rings to reduce potential for unproductive protein binding,
we were able to identify active molecules with improved selectiv-
ity over CB1. These compounds were dosed orally in a mouse mod-
el of inflammation and showed efficacy comparable to
prednisolone. Consequently, these CB2 selective agonists should
be devoid of CB1-mediated psychotropic effects with data support-
ing their use for the treatment of inflammatory indications.
2. Devane, W. A.; Dysarz, F. A., III; Johnson, M. R., et al Mol. Pharmacol. 1988, 605.
3. Munro, S.; Thomas, K. L.; Abu-Shaar, M. Nature 1993, 365, 61.
4. Herkenham, M.; Lynn, A. B.; Little, M. D.; Johnson, M. R.; Melvin, L. S.; de Costa,
B. R.; Rice, K. C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1990, 87, 1932.
5. Gerard, C. M.; Mollereau, C.; Vassart, G.; Parmentier, M. Biochem. J. 1991, 279,
129.
6. Galiegue, S.; Mary, S.; Marchand, J.; Dussossoy, D.; Carriere, D.; Carayon, P.;
Bouaboula, M.; Shire, D.; Fur, G.; Casellas, P. Eur. J. Biochem. 1995, 232, 54.
7. Straiker, A.; Stella, N.; Piomelli, D.; Mackie, K.; Karten, H. J.; Maguire, G. Proc.
Nat. Acad. Sci. 1999, 96, 14565.
8. Bouaboula, M.; Rinaldi, M.; Carayon, P.; Carillon, C.; Delpech, B.; Shire, D.; Fur,
G.; Casellas, P. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993, 214, 173.
9. Van Sickle, M. D.; Duncan, M.; Kingsley, P. J.; Mouihate, A.; Urbani, P.; Mackie,
K.; Stella, N.; Makriyannis, A.; Piomelli, D.; Davison, Joseph S.; Marnett, L. J.; Di
Marzo, V.; Pittman, Q. J.; Patel, K. D.; Sharkey, K. A. Science 2005, 310, 329.
10. Croxford, J. L.; Yamamura, T. J. Neuroimmunol. 2005, 166, 3.
11. Ashton, J. C. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 2007, 8, 373.
12. Croxford, J. L.; Miller, S. D. J. Clin. Invest. 2008, 111, 1231.
13. Fernandez-Ruiz, J.; Romero, J.; Velasco, G.; Tolon, R. M.; Ramos, J. A.; Guzman,
M. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2007, 28, 39.
14. Whiteside, G. T.; Lee, G. P.; Valenzano, K. J. Curr. Med. Chem. 2007, 14, 917.
15. Cheng, Y.; Hitchcock, S. A. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2007, 16, 951.
16. Guindon, J.; Hohmann, A. G. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 153, 319.
17. Yao, B. B.; Hsieh, G. C.; Frost, J. M.; Fan, Y.; Garrison, T. R.; Daza, A. V.; Grayson,
G. K.; Zhu, C. Z.; Pai, M.; Chandran, P.; Salyers, A. K.; Wensink, E. J.; Honore, P.;
Sullivan, J. P.; Dart, M. J.; Meyer, M. D. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 153, 390.
18. Valenzano, K. J.; Tafesse, L.; Lee, G.; Harrison, J. E.; Boulet, J. M.; Gottshall, S. L.;
Mark, L.; Pearson, M. S.; Miller, W.; Shan, S.; Rabadi, L.; Rotshteyn, Y.; Chaffer, S.
M.; Turchin, P. I.; Elsemore, D. A.; Toth, M.; Koetzner, L.; Whiteside, G. T.
Neuropharmacology 2005, 48, 658.
19. Giblin, G. M. P.; O’Shaughnessy, C. T.; Naylor, A.; Mitchell, W. L.; Eatherton, A. J.;
Slingsby, B. P.; Rawlings, D. A.; Goldsmith, P.; Brown, A. J.; Haslam, C. P.;
Clayton, N. M.; Wilson, A. W.; Chessell, I. P.; Wittington, A. R.; Green, R. J. Med.
Chem. 2007, 50, 2597.
20. Pharmos Corp. WO2006/043260.
21. Human CB2 receptor binding assay: CB2 membranes were isolated from HEK
cells stably transfected with the CB2 receptor. The membrane preparation was
bound to scintillation beads (Ysi-Poly-L-lysince SPA beads, GE Healthcare) in
assay buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 2.5 mM EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.8%
fatty acid in free Bovine Serum Albumin. Unbound membrane was removed by
washing in assay buffer. Membrane-bead mixture was added to the 96-well
assay plates in the amounts of 2 mg membrane per well (CB2) and 1 mg SPA
bead per well. Compounds were added to the membrane-bead mixture in
dose-response concentrations ranging from 1 Â 10À5 M to 1 Â 10À10 M. The
competition reaction was initiated with the addition of [3H]-CP55940 or [3H]-
Win55212 as noted (Perkin–Elmer Life and Analytical Sciences) at a final
concentration of 4 nM. IC50 values for each compound were calculated as the
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Drs. John Regan and Matthew
Netherton for their time and effort in proof reading the manuscript.