COMMUNICATION
diols 1a and 1c were treated
with lithium bromide using a
Pd–Cu
system. Interestingly, the bro-
moetherification products
bimetallic
catalytic
4
were observed and, upon further
optimization, could be obtained
in reasonable yields. These con-
ditions were applied to b,g-al-
lendiols 1b and 1d. To our de-
light, in contrast to the oxybro-
mination reaction of methyl al-
lendiols 1a and 1c which led to
a bromodihydropyran, the reac-
Scheme 2. Palladium-catalyzed preparation of dihydropyrans 4 and tetrahydrofurans 5. Reagents and condi-
tions: i) 7 mol% Pd
diphenylsilyl.
ACHTUNTGNERN(UG OAc)2, LiBr, CuAHCUTTGNRENN(GUN OAc)2, K2CO3, MeCN, O2, RT, 2 h. PMP=4-MeOC6H4. TPS=tert-butyl-
tion of phenyl allendiols 1b and 1d under identical condi-
tions afforded 2-(1-bromovinyl)tetrahydrofurans
5
(Scheme 2).[7] Thus, by a subtle variation in the substitution
pattern of the b,g-allendiol (Ph versus Me) both the chemo-
and the regioselectivity can be completely reversed. The dif-
ference in reactivity between both types of allendiols could
be explained by considering the electron-withdrawing ca-
pacity of the phenyl substituent compared to the electron-
donating capacity of the methyl group. Probably, the pres-
ence of a Ph substituent in the allene moiety strengthened
the electrophilicity of the benzylic-like carbon, favoring the
5-exo cyclization of the primary hydroxy group over the 6-
endo cyclization of the secondary hydroxy group. The p-me-
thoxybenzoyloxy group comprises a large substituent; how-
ever, the cis attack, which would be disfavored with a larger
ZO group, increases with 1b (Z=COPMP) in comparison
with 1d (Z=Me). The reason for the total diastereoselectiv-
ity for the 5-exo cyclization toward the internal allene
carbon atom on phenyl allendiol 1d to give adduct 5b com-
pared to the moderate diastereoselectivity of phenyl allen-
diol 1b to give adduct 5a in the examples in Scheme 2, may
be related to unfavorable steric interactions between the
ZO group and Pd in the p-allylpalladium intermediate de-
rived from 1b, hampering the required conformation for the
trans attack.
Scheme 3. Preparation of oxocines 8 and oxocinone 9. Reagents and con-
ditions: i) 5 mol% [Pd(PPh3)4], PhI, K2CO3, toluene, 808C, 120 h; ii)
5 mol% PdCl2, DMF, RT, 8a: 14 h; 8b: 16 h; 8c: 16 h; 8d: 15 h; 8e:
15 h; iii) Dess–Martin periodinane, CH2Cl2, RT, 2 h. PMP=4-MeOC6H4.
AHCTUNGTRENNUNG
cyclization by attack of the primary hydroxy group at the
terminal allene carbon atom.[9] To the best of our knowl-
edge, no example of an 8-endo cyclization at the terminal
allene carbon atom of a d-allenol has been reported. Thus,
we present experimental evidence concerning the 8-endo-
trig cyclization pathways in allene oxycyclization reactions
that enriches Baldwinꢃs rules for ring closure. Besides, oxo-
To assess the scope of the reaction, the even more chal-
lenging 2-azetidinone-tethered g,d-allendiols 6 were tested
as cycloetherification substrates. Attempts to generate a bi-
cyclic structure from 6a by using Pd0 catalysts in the pres-
ence of iodobenzene failed, because b-hydride elimination
to afford diene
more effectively.[8] Accordingly,
solutions of g,d-allendiols
7 competes
6
were exposed to the above-
mentioned conditions for PdII-
catalyzed
heterocyclizations.
Much to our delight, adducts
8a–e were obtained in good
yields in a totally chemo- and
regioselective fashion using the
PdCl2-catalyzed cyclizative cou-
pling reaction with allyl halides
Scheme 4. Preparation of oxocines 10 and dibromide 11. Reagents and conditions: i) 7 mol% Pd
ACHTUNGRTENUN(NG OAc)2, LiBr,
(Scheme 3), through a 8-endo Cu
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 2496 – 2499
ꢂ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
2497