Total Syntheses of Psychotrimine and Kapakahines B and F
A R T I C L E S
Scheme 13. Preparation of the Tripeptide Fragment 116a
121 was synthesized and used quickly due to slow decomposi-
tion. Methyl ester hydrolysis of the alkyne and peptide coupling
to H2N-Ala-Leu-OBn66 proceeded with high efficiency to
provide tripeptide 116.
Larock coupling of 102b with 116 furnished 123 (Scheme
14), which contains the necessary framework to complete
kapakahine F (2). Importantly, the use of Pd(dppf)Cl2 led to a
decrease in reaction time in addition to less depreciation of yield
with increasing scale.53b Double deprotection of the Cbz and
benzyl ester in 123 occurred without event, and the macrocyclic
peptide coupling was attempted under standard conditions, but
isomerization of the pyrroloindoline was not observed. Instead,
the structure of the product was firmly established by HMBC
correlation to be the pyrroloindoline product 124. Alternatively,
coupling of tripeptide 126 to the secondary amine 125 provided
127, which was prepared for a Larock macrocyclization.67
However, in this critical step the same undesired macrocyclic
intermediate, 124, was obtained. Obtaining this product provided
an opportunity to investigate the possibility of achieving an
isomerization event, as illustrated in Figure 13.
With a number of relevant substrates in hand, several
approaches for the crucial isomerization of a pyrroloindoline
to an R-carboline were evaluated (Figure 13): (A) initial
isomerization of differentially substituted pyrroloindolines hav-
ing an o-iodoaniline linked at C-3 (128), (B) isomerization with
an indole at C3 in a macrocyclic context (131), and (C)
rearrangement analogous to scenario A with aniline functionality
and where both nitrogens of tryptophan and phenylalanine are
amides (127). All three approaches outlined above were
attempted to give an R-carboline with or without imidazolone
formation. It was believed that formation of an imid-
azolone could act as a point of irreversibility, such that even if
the R-carboline were less favored, kinetic trapping could afford
the desired product.
To commence these studies, treatment of the pyrroloindoline
102a (Scheme 12) with a variety of acidic conditions (TFA,
AcOH, TMSI, SiO2, etc.) to remove the Boc group and possibly
lead to subsequent rearrangement (Figure 13A) caused extensive
decomposition accompanied by loss of the newly coupled
aniline, analogous to that shown in Scheme 8. Removal of the
Cbz group in 102b, avoiding aryl iodide reduction or loss of
the aniline altogether, proved fruitless (NaBH4, TMSI,
BF3 ·OEt2, Pd(OAc)2/Et3SiH, etc.). The Fmoc removal pro-
ceeded cleanly; however, direct isomerization to the R-carboline
with or without concomitant imidazolone formation was not
observed (BF3 ·Et2O, Sc(OTf)3, MeOH reflux, etc.). Failure to
isomerize these readily obtained intermediates dictated the
necessity of a late-stage isomerization strategy (scenarios B and
C, Figure 13).
a Reagents and conditions: (a) CuCN (0.9 equiv), LiCl (1.8 equiv), Zn
(3.6 equiv), TMSCl (0.1 equiv), Br(CH2)2Br (0.2 equiv), DMF, -20 f 23
°C, 11 h, 60%; (b) LiOH (1.2 equiv), THF/H2O 1:1, 0 °C, 0.5 h; H2N-
Ala-Leu-OBn (1.1 equiv), EDC (1.2 equiv), HOBt (1.4 equiv), THF, 0 f
23 °C, 10 h, 97% (two steps).
The well-documented challenge58 of forming R-carboline
systems such as that found in the kapakahines coupled with
our failure to achieve its direct synthesis (Scheme 12A)
prompted the design of a radically different approach (Scheme
12B). We reasoned that it might be possible to achieve the
conversion of the readily accessible pyrroloindoline architecture
(isomer A) into the topologically distinct, yet constitutionally
isomeric, R-carboline system (isomer B). Since these two
isomers might be in a dynamic equilibrium (favoring isomer
A), it would be necessary to achieve an irreversible kinetic trap.
While highly speculative, the powerfully simplifying nature of
this plan was enticing.
Beginning with dipeptide 120, the pyrroloindoline was
obtained by direct coupling with aniline in the absence of base,
which led to an increased rate of reaction (Scheme 11C). This
oxidative coupling tolerates a variety of typical carbamate
protecting groups on the phenylalanine amine (102a-c) and
remains exclusively exo selective (102). The absence of the endo
diastereomer by TLC, LC-MS, and crude 1H NMR is consistent
with our studies on Boc-Trp-OMe (Vide supra). In line with
previous observations (Scheme 11A), direct formation of the
R-carboline was not observed.
In order to investigate isomerization strategies, the Larock
coupling partner tripeptide 116 was required (Scheme 13). A
route to enantiopure alkyne amino acid 122 was therefore
devised. Several methods were available, including using
Schollko¨pf’s chiral auxiliary59,60 or an asymmetric catalyst in
an alkylation strategy.61 Alternatively, beginning with serine-
derived iodoalanine62 121, Knochel’s copper/zinc63 coupling to
bromo TES-acetylene64 provided large amounts of the alkyne
amino acid as a single enantiomer.65 The copper/zinc-mediated
coupling proved to be reliable on a large scale if the iodoalanine
Thus, several reactions were attempted to convert the pyr-
roloindoline 131 to the R-carboline 132 or 133 (Figure 13B).
Thermal, acidic, and basic conditions were attempted, as well as
(57) Varying the substrate or oxidant led to unproductive oxidation, double
addition, or no reaction at all.
(58) Chaetominine isolation: (a) Jiao, R. H.; Xu, S.; Liu, J. Y.; Ge, H. M.;
Ding, H.; Xu, C.; Zhu, H. L.; Tan, R. X. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5709.
Synthesis of chaetominine: (b) Snider, B. B.; Wu, X. Org. Lett. 2007,
9, 4913. (c) Malgesini, B.; Forte, B.; Toumi, M.; Couty, F.; Marrot,
J.; Evano, G. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5027. (d) Borghi, D.; Quartieri, F.;
Gennari, C.; Papeo, G. Chem.sEur. J. 2009, 15, 7922. (e) Coste, A.;
Karthikeyan, G.; Couty, F.; Evano, G. Synthesis 2009, 17, 2927.
(59) Scho¨llkopf, U.; Groth, U.; Deng, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1981, 20, 798–799.
(61) Castle, S. L.; Srikanth, G. S. C. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3611.
(62) Trost, B. M.; Rudd, M. T. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4599.
(63) Yeh, M. C. P.; Knochel, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 4799.
(64) Nie, X.; Wang, G. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 4734.
(65) IJsselstijn, M.; Kaiser, J.; van Delft, F. L.; Schoemaker, H. E.; Rutjes,
F. P. J. T. Amino Acids 2003, 24, 263.
(60) (a) Ma, J.; Yin, W.; Zhou, H.; Cook, J. M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3491.
(b) Zhou, H.; Liao, X.; Yin, W.; Ma, J.; Cook, J. M. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 251. (c) Yu, J.; Wearing, X. Z.; Cook, J. M. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 3963. (d) Zhou, H.; Liao, K.; Cook, J. M. Org. Lett. 2004,
6, 249. (e) Liu, X.; Deschamp, J. R.; Cook, J. R. Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
3339. (f) Ma, C.; Liu, X.; Li, X.; Flippen-Anderson, J.; Yu, S.; Cook,
J. M. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 55, 4525.
(66) Boggs, N. T.; Bruton, H. D.; Craig, D. H.; Helpern, J. A.; Marsh,
H. C.; Pegram, M. D.; Vandenbergh, D. J.; Koehler, K. A.; Hiskey,
R. G. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 1812.
(67) For the first example of a macrocyclic Larock cyclization, see:
Garfunkle, J.; Kimball, F. S.; Kimball, F. S.; Trzupek, J. D.; Takizawa,
S.; Shimamura, H.; Tomishima, M.; Boger, D. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 16036.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 20, 2010 7133