COMMUNICATION
Table 1. Hydroamination of alkynes a–f with primary amines 1 and 2.[a]
to the involvement of an imido complex (LxM=NR) in the
catalytic cycle.[13] Uchimaru[14] reported that a ruthenium
cluster was efficient but the scope of the reaction was strict-
ly limited to arylacetylenes and N-methyl aniline; moreover
a 10-fold excess of amine was necessary. Schmidt[15] de-
scribed the addition of morpholine (62% yield) and piperi-
dine (38% yield) to phenylacetylene in the presence of pal-
ladium(II) 3-iminophosphine complexes; in this case, a 10-
fold excess of alkyne was necessary due to the competing
cyclotrimerization of phenylacetylene. Lastly, there is only
one report concerning the hydroamination of internal al-
kynes with secondary amines. In 2005, using 10 mol% of the
Entry Amine Alkyne T [8C] t [h] Product
Yield[b]
81
1
2
1
1
a
40
90
16
12
b
86
aquapalladium complex [Pd
to[16] reported the addition of N-methylaniline to diphenyl-
acetylene and phenyl(butyl)acetylene in good yields. Clearly
ACHTUNGTRENU(GNN dppe)ACHTUNREGTG(NNUN H2O)2]ACHTNGUTRENN(UGN TfO)2, Yamamo-
3
4
1
1
c
120
140
16
12
93
94
A
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
general catalytic systems able to promote the intermolecular
hydroamination of alkynes, especially with basic secondary
amines are still missing.
d
Recently, we have shown that the cationic gold(I) com-
5
6
7
1
1
2
e
f
100
90
10
24
12
94
82
81
plex A1 (Scheme 1),[17,18] featuring a bulky cyclic (alkyl)-
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
(amino)carbene (CAAC),[19] as ancillary ligand, efficiently
promotes the addition of ammonia to non-activated
alkynes.[20] These first examples of homogeneous catalytic
d
140
hydroamination with ammonia hinted at the possibility of a
general catalyst for the hydroamination of alkynes with sec-
ondary amines.
[a] A1 (5 mol%), amine (0.5 mmol), alkyne (0.5 mmol), C6D6 (0.4 mL).
[b] Yields are determined by H NMR using benzylmethyl ether as an in-
ternal standard.
1
Here we report that complex A1 catalyzes the addition of
many types of non-tertiary amines to terminal as well as in-
ternal alkynes, and the first examples of intermolecular hy-
droamination of internal alkynes with secondary alkyl
amines. Moreover, we show that addition of a terminal
alkyne to the in situ formed enamines, allows for the synthe-
sis of a variety of allenes without any additional catalyst.
Since several catalytic systems are known to promote the
hydroamination of alkynes with primary amines, we briefly
investigated if complex A1, prepared by mixing the corre-
sponding [(CAAC)AuCl] A complex with one equivalent of
Table 2 shows that diarylamine 3, arylalkylamine 4, benzocy-
clic amine 5, and even dialkylamine 6 add to terminal al-
kynes a, as well as internal alkynes b–d at temperatures be-
tween 60 to 1208C, and reaction times between 7 to 24 h,
using 5 mol% of A1. The only noticeable difficulties have
been found with phenylacetylene a (except entry 1), because
of competitive oligomerization processes. With phenylacety-
lene a (entries 1, 3, 7, 11) and diphenylacetylene b (entries 4,
8, 12) the Markovnikov adduct and the E isomer, respective-
ly, were exclusively formed. With methylphenylacetylene c,
in most cases, the expected mixture of Markovnikov and
anti-Markovnikov products were obtained (entries 2, 5, 9,
13) but more surprising are the results observed with diethyl-
acetylene d (entries 6, 10, 14). Indeed, we observed that the
expected hydroamination adduct was only the minor prod-
uct (21–43%) of the reaction, the major product (79–57%)
being an isomer in which the unsaturation has been shifted.
So far, we have no explanation for this isomerization. How-
ever, as can be seen below, this is not a hurdle for the next
step of the cascade reaction leading to allenes.
KBACHTUNGTRENNUNG(C6F5)4 (Scheme 1e) was efficient as well. We chose the
bulky mesitylamine 1, as an example of arylamine, and six
different alkynes a–f, which are representative of all types of
simple acetylene derivatives (Table 1). In all cases
(entries 1–6), clean reactions occurred (81–94% yield) at
temperatures between 40 and 1408C, and a reaction time
between 10 to 24 h, using 5 mol% of A1. Not surprisingly, a
mixture of Markovnikov and anti-Markovnikov products
were obtained when methylphenylacetylene c and tert-butyl-
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
obtained (entry 6). Since the reaction with 3-hexyne re-
quired the most drastic conditions, this substrate was used to
test a primary alkylamine, and we chose the bulky tert-butyl-
amine (entry 7). We were pleased to observe that after 12 h
at 1408C, the hydroamination adduct was obtained in 81%
yield (as a 55/45 mixture of E and Z isomers), indicating the
broad applicability of our catalytic system.
Then, having demonstrated that complex A1 allowed for
the synthesis of tertiary enamines, with alkyl substituents at
nitrogen, we investigated the one-pot preparation of allenes
by coupling two alkynes, using a sacrificial secondary amine
(Scheme 1d). Our synthetic strategy was first checked by
studying the homocoupling of tert-butylacetylene e. A deu-
terated benzene solution of alkyne with 0.5 equivalent of
various amines was heated at 1208C for 16 h, in the pres-
ence of 5 mol% of A1. As shown in Scheme 2, (methyl)-
These quite promising results prompted us to investigate
the hydroamination of alkynes with secondary amines.
Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 3056 – 3060
ꢁ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3057