M. K. Khera et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 2887–2889
2889
Table 2
CYP profile and metabolic stability of 4l
Compound
% CYP inhibition (at 10
lM)
Metabolic stability
ml/min/g liver
HLM
1A2
0
2C9
15
2C19
30
2D6
13
3A4
28
4l
0.3
derivatives (4l and 4m) were found to have values closer to that
of Linezolid.
In summary, we have described initial results from a study of 3-
(4-([1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]pyrimidin-3-yl)phenyl)oxazolidin-2-ones.
The thioamide derivatives 4l and 4m were found to display a good
antibacterial activity profile against all the Gram-positive patho-
gens tested. Compound 4l was also found to be metabolically sta-
ble and devoid of any CYP liability up to a concentration of 10 lM.
Further modifications in this series of compounds including the
impact of additional fluorine atom substitution in the phenyl ring
and substitutions on the triazolopyrimidine ring will be the subject
of further communications.
Figure 3. MIC values of 4l and Linezolid against Gram-positive strains.
Deprotonation followed by reaction with (R)-glycidyl butyrate
yielded the oxazolidinone alcohol 11. This was converted to the
corresponding azide 13 by a series of nucleophilic reactions. The
azide derivative was converted to the corresponding amine 14
with triphenyl phosphine in aqueous THF with heating.14 It should
be noted that hydride-containing reagents (e.g. LAH) or hydrogena-
tion methods were not suitable for this transformation owing to
the reactivity of the triazolopyrimidine ring. The amine derivative
14 was converted to the corresponding amides 4a–k, carbamates
4n–p, ureas 4q–s and thioureas 4t–v using standard procedures.
The amides 4a–b were also converted to the corresponding thio-
amides 4l–m using Lawesson’s reagent.15
Acknowledgements
We thank the analytical chemistry department of New Drug
Discovery Research, Ranbaxy Research Laboratories for support.
We also thank the metabolism and pharmacokinetics department
for ADME related support.
References and notes
1. Service, R. F. Science 1995, 270, 724.
2. Swartz, M. N. Proc. Natl. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91, 2420.
Final compounds 4a–v were screened16 against target patho-
gens including both Gram-positive (E. faecalis ATCC 29212, S. aur-
eus MRSA 43300, S. aureus ATCC 25923 S. epidermidis ATCC
12228) and Gram-negative (E. Coli ATCC 25922) strains (Table 1).
Compounds showed varying degrees of activity against Gram-posi-
tive pathogens; however, all the compounds were found to be inac-
tive against E. coli. A weak enhancement of activity was observed
among the alkyl amide derivatives 4a–k when the alkyl group
was relatively small in size (compare acetamide 4a and cyclopro-
pyl amide 4i with the larger alkylamides 4b–f, 4j–k). The surpris-
ingly moderate to good activity of relatively large chloroacetamide
derivatives 4g–h may arise from electronic effects such as
enhancement of double bond character within the carbonyl group
of the amide. Such enhancement of electron density in this region
would be expected to occur when the carbonyl oxygen atom is re-
placed by sulphur and it was gratifying to see that the thioamide
derivatives 4l–m displayed excellent potency against all Gram-
positive target pathogens tested. Indeed, thioacetamide 4l was
found to be two- to four- fold more potent than Linezolid. As ex-
pected, the sterically demanding and less electron rich carbamate,
urea and thiourea systems 4n–v had moderate to low activity
against Gram-positive pathogens. In order to establish the spec-
trum of activity, the most potent compound 4l was tested against
other Gram-positive strains including Streptococcus pneumoniae
and Streptococcus pyogenes ( Fig. 3). Compound 4l, being active
against these strains, indicates that it could be useful in treating
upper respiratory tract bacterial infections. This compound was
also profiled for its CYP liability17 and metabolic stability18 and
found to be stable in human liver microsome and to have no
3. Tomasz, A. N. Eng. J. Med. 1994, 330, 1247.
4. Selvekumar, N.; Srinivas, D.; Khera, M. K.; Kumar, M. S.; Mamidi, N. V. S. R.;
Sarnaik, H.; Chandershekhar, C.; Rao, B. S.; Raheem, M. A.; Das, J.; Iqbal, J.;
Rajagopalan, R. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 3953.
5. Brickner, S. J. Curr. Pharm. Des. 1996, 2, 175.
6. Phillips, O. A. Curr. Opin. Invest. Drugs 2003, 4, 117.
7. Brickner, S. J.; Hutchinson, D. K.; Barbachyn, M. R.; Manninen, P. R.; Ulanowicz,
D. A.; Garmon, S. A.; Grega, K. C.; Henges, S. K.; Toops, D. S.; Ford, C. W.;
Zurenko, G. E. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 673.
8. Swaney, S. M.; Aoki, H.; Ganoza, M. C.; Shinabarger, D. L. Antimicrob. Agents
Chemother. 1998, 42, 3251.
9. Aoki, H.; Ke, L.; Poppe, S. M.; Poel, T. J.; Weaver, E. A.; Gadwood, R. C.; Thomas,
R. C.; Shinabarger, D. L.; Ganoza, M. C. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46,
1080.
10. Prakash, O.; Bhardwaj, V.; Kumar, R.; Tyagi, P.; Aneja, K. R. Eur. J. Med. Chem.
2004, 39, 1073.
11. Kumar, R.; Nair, R. R.; Dhiman, S. S.; Sharma, J.; Prakash, O. Eur. J. Med. Chem.
2009, 44, 2260.
12. Srinivasan, V.; Jebaratnam, D. J.; Budil, D. E. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5644.
13. Sadana, A. K.; Mirza, Y.; Aneja, K. R.; Prakash, O. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 38, 533.
14. Vaultier, A.; Knouzi, N.; Carrie, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 763.
15. Cava, M. P.; Levinson, M. I. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 5061.
16. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined as per the CLSI
guidelines 2009, 29(2), M07-A8.
17. CYP inhibition was evaluated in vitro using a standard commercial kit (BD-
Gentest) comprising recombinant CYPs, fluorogenic substrates, standard
inhibitors, buffers and stop reagents. The recombinant CYP metabolizes the
(non-fluorescent) fluorogenic substrate into
a fluorescent product, whose
fluorescence is measured in a fluorescent plate reader. The concentration-
dependent ability of compounds to reduce this fluorescence for each individual
CYP is measured and reported as CYP inhibition.
18. Compound 4l (10 lM concentration) was incubated with liver microsomes
(1 mg/mL), obtained from BD Gentest, at 37 °C in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4)
with UDPGA and an NADPH regenerating system. Samples were withdrawn at
specific time points up to 30 min. Reaction was immediately quenched and the
parent compound quantified by LCMS. The data was analyzed using GRAPHPAD
PRISM software.
19. Apparent Caco-2 cell permeability was calculated using an in-silico ADME
prediction tool (Qik Prop from Schrodinger molecular modeling suite). The
predicted permeability values for compounds 4a, 4b, 4l, 4m and Linezolid were
found to be 55, 81, 277, 311 and 520 nm/s, respectively.
CYP-related liabilities up to a concentration of 10 lM (Table 2).
Interestingly, the predicted permeability19 of amide derivatives
(4a and 4b) was low; however, the corresponding thioamide