pubs.acs.org/joc
enantio-enriched compounds.2 The conformer population
Supramolecular-Directed Chiral Induction in
Biaryl Derivatives
of a dynamically racemic mixture (rapidly interconverting
enantiomers) can be disturbed from equilibrium by a
chiral bias. Some examples of this strategy have been repor-
ted,1a-c,e,f,h,3 and this paper details our preliminary efforts in
the induction and control of axial chirality in stereolabile
biaryls, by means of hydrogen bonding. Further, the effects
of orthogonal binding motifs (aromatic interactions with
respect to hydrogen bonding) have proven to be a tool to
switch the sense of chiral induction.
J. Etxebarria,† H. Degenbeck,† A.-S. Felten,† S. Serres,†
N. Nieto,† and A. Vidal-Ferran*,†,‡
†Institute of Chemical Research of Catalonia (ICIQ),
Av. Paısos Catalans 16, 43007 Tarragona, Spain, and
¨
‡Catalan Institute for Research and Advanced Studies
(ICREA), Pg. Lluis Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain
We envisaged that supramolecular complexes of the type 1
could be formed from enantiopure diamines 3a-g and free
rotating (tropos)3a biphenyl-2,20-diols 2a-c by two simulta-
neous hydrogen bonding interactions between the amino and
hydroxyl substituents (Scheme 1). It was reasoned that the
multipoint interactions would increase the strength of the
complexation process through the chelate effect,4 thus pre-
ferentially leading to cyclic structures.
Received July 17, 2009
SCHEME 1. Design of Hydrogen Bonding-Mediated
Complexes 1
A thermodynamically controlled resolution has allowed
for the generation of diastereomerically enriched com-
plexes, by chirality transfer from an enantiopure building
block to a dynamically racemic biaryl derivative. A swit-
chable sense of induction could be achieved depending on
the substituents of the chiral block.
Aliphatic amino and phenolic groups can be regarded as
complementary hydrogen bonding acceptors and donors,
the hydrogen bonding between them has been well studied
both experimentally5 and theoretically.6 The ortho-substit-
uents of the phenolic OH groups were essential to our
approach: their electronic character, acceptor or donator,
should be reflected in an enhanced (or decreased) acidity of
the phenol group, and hence in the strength of any resulting
hydrogen bond.6 For this purpose, compounds 2 with do-
nator (R1 = Me, 2b; R1 = OMe, 2c) and acceptor groups
(R1 = NO2, 2a) were synthesized. Another key strategy was
altering the N-substituents which, through steric interactions
Hydrogen bonding has long been used as a driving force
for chiral recognition and binding, and a great number of
chiral supramolecular complexes have been prepared with
this strategy.1 In most cases, chemical and physical proper-
ties associated with chirality are due to “static” stereochem-
istry, the fixed spatial arrangements of atoms. Conversely,
dynamic stereochemistry deals with molecular changes and
constitutes an interesting alternative strategy for generating
(1) See for example: (a) Mizutani, T.; Takagi, H.; Hara, O.; Horiguchi,
T.; Ogoshi, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 1991–1994. (b) Takagi, H.;
Mizutani, T.; Horiguchi, T.; Kitagawa, S.; Ogoshi, H. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2005, 3, 2091–2094. (c) Eelkema, R.; Feringa, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 13480–13481. (d) Breit, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6816–6825.
(e) Morioka, K.; Tamagawa, N.; Maeda, K.; Yashima, E. Chem. Lett. 2006,
35, 110–111. (f) Ishii, Y.; Onda, Y.; Kubo, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47,
8221–8225. (g) Ikeda, T.; Hirata, O.; Takeuchi, M.; Shinkai, S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 16008–16009. (h) Suzuki, T.; Ohta, K.; Nehira, T.; Higuchi,
H.; Ohta, E.; Kawai, H.; Fujiwara, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 772–776.
(i) Yu, J.; RajanBabu, T. V.; Parquette, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
7845–7847. (j) Hembury, G. A.; Borovkov, V. V.; Inoue, Y. Chem. Rev. 2008,
108, 1–73. (k) Breuil, P. A. R.; Patureau, F.; Reek, J. N. H. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2009, 48, 2162-2165 and references cited therein.
(3) See for example: (a) Walsh, P. J.; Lurain, A. E.; Balsells, J. Chem. Rev.
2003, 103, 3297–3344. (b) Costa, A. M.; Jimeno, C.; Gavenonis, J.; Carroll, P. J.;
Walsh, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6929-6941 and references cited
therein.
(4) (a) Blackman, A. G. C. R. Chim. 2005, 8, 107–119. (b) Bowman, D. C.
J. Chem. Educ. 2006, 83, 1158–1160.
(5) (a) Gurka, D.; Taft, R. W.; Joris, L.; Schleyer, P. v. R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1967, 89, 5957–5958. (b) Kraemer, R.; Zundel, G. J. Chem. Soc.,
Faraday Trans. 1990, 86, 301–305. (c) Koll, A.; Rospenk, M.; Sobczyk, L.
J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 1981, 77, 2309–2314. (d) Albrecht, G.;
Zundel, G. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 1984, 80, 553–561. (e) Pawelka,
Z.; Kuc, T. Pol. J. Chem. 2001, 75, 845–855.
(6) (a) Gilli, P.; Pretto, L.; Bertolasi, V.; Gilli, G. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009,
42, 33–44. (b) Szatylowicz, H. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2008, 21, 897–914.
(c) Hunter, C. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5310–5324. (d) Fedorowicz,
A.; Koll, A.; Mavri, J. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2003, 109, 220–228.
(2) Wolf, C. Dynamic Stereochemistry of Chiral Compounds: Principles
and Applications; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2008.
8794 J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 8794–8797
Published on Web 10/16/2009
DOI: 10.1021/jo9015425
r
2009 American Chemical Society