D. Castagnolo et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 2203–2205
2205
imum inhibitory concentration (l
g mLꢁ1) was determined for each
6. McLean, K. J.; Marshall, K. R.; Richmond, A.; Hunter, I. S.; Fowler, K.; Kieser, T.;
Gurcha, S. S.; Besra, G. S.; Munro, A. W. Microbiology 2002, 148, 2937.
7. Guardiola-Diaz, H.; Foster, L.-A.; Mushrush, D.; Vaz, A. D. N. Biochem.
Pharmacol. 2001, 61, 1463.
8. (a) Ahmad, Z.; Sharma, S.; Khuller, G. K. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006, 261, 181; (b)
Ahmad, Z.; Sharma, S.; Khuller, G. K. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006, 258, 200.
9. Munro, A. W.; McLean, K. J.; Marshall, K. R.; Warman, A. J.; Lewis, G.; Roitel, O.;
Sutcliffe, M. J.; Kemp, C. A.; Modi, S.; Scrutton, N. S.; Leys, D. Biochem. Soc. Trans.
2003, 31, 625.
compound. Clotrimazole and econazole were used a reference
compounds.14 Resulting data are reported in Table 2. Compounds
4a and b showed medium activity toward MTB as well as com-
pounds 4d (entries 1–4 and 7 and 8). In all these cases, both enan-
tiomers presented the same biological profile. On the contrary,
componds 4c resulted to be inactive (entries 5 and 6). Finally the
bromo derivatives 4e showed good MIC values. In particular one
of the two enantiomers, namely (R)-4e (entry 10), proved to have
very promising antimycobacterial activity, showing a biological
profile similar to econazole (entry 12) and better than clotrimazole
(entry 11).15
In conclusion, a new class of azole derivatives has been synthes-
ised. All the compounds were obtained in good yield and in enan-
tiomerically pure form and were tested as new potential
antitubercular agents. One of those compounds, derivative (R)-
4e17,18 showed good activity against MTB. Interestingly, its enan-
tiomer, derivative (S)-4e presented higher MIC values, confirming
the importance of synthesizing enantiomerically pure compounds
due to the different interactions of single enantiomers with chiral
biological systems. Attempts to design and synthesize novel azole
derivatives of 4 to improve the activity against MTB are currently
in progress.
10. Seward, H. E.; Roujeinikova, A.; McLean, K. J.; Munro, A. W.; Leys, D. J. Biol.
Chem. 2006, 281, 39437.
11. Manetti, F.; Magnani, M.; Castagnolo, D.; Passalacqua, L.; Botta, M.; Corelli, F.;
Saddi, M.; Deidda, D.; De Logu, A. Chem. Med. Chem. 2006, 1, 973.
12. Castagnolo, D.; De Logu, A.; Radi, M.; Bechi, B.; Manetti, F.; Magnani, M.;
Supino, S.; Meleddu, R.; Chisu, L.; Botta, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 8587.
13. (a) Castagnolo, D.; Dessı‘, F.; Radi, M.; Botta, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007,
18, 1345; (b) Castagnolo, D.; Renzulli, M. L.; Galletti, E.; Corelli, F.; Botta, M.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 2893.
14. Menozzi, G.; Morello, L.; Fossa, P.; Schenone, S.; Ranise, A.; Mosti, L.;
Bondavalli, F.; Loddo, R.; Murgioni, C.; Mascia, V.; La Colla, P.; Tamburini, E.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 5465.
15. M. tuberculosis H37Rv ATCC 27294 was used in this study. It was maintained on
Löwenstein-Jensen (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France) agar slants until
needed. MICs were determined by a standard twofold agar dilution method.
Briefly, 1 mL of Middlebrook 7H11 agar (Becton Dickinson BBL, Sparks, MD)
supplemented with 10% oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase enrichment
containing the testing compounds in 24-multiwell plates at concentrations
ranging between 0.0312 and 64 lg/mL was inoculated with 10 lL of a
suspension containing M. tuberculosis H37Rv 1.5 ꢂ 105 cfu/mL grown on
Middlebrook 7H9 broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI) supplemented with
10% albumin–dextrose–catalase enrichment. Final inoculum was 1.5 ꢂ 103 per
well and was obtained as described previously.11,12 Plates were incubated for
21–28 days and MICs were read as minimal concentrations of compounds
completely inhibiting visible growth of mycobacteria.
Acknowledgements
16. QikProp, version 2.5, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2005.
Financial support from the Italian Ministero dell’Istruzione,
dell’Università e della Ricerca (PRIN 2007N7KYCY) is gratefully
acknowledged. CARIPLO (Grant Rif. 2006.0880/10.8485 Bando
2006) is gratefully acknowledged.
17. Synthesis of azoles 4. General procedure.Amine 3 (0.38 mmol) was dissolved into
a solution of H2O/dioxane (3/1 mL) and H3PO4 was added until pH 2. Then solid
paraformaldehyde (15 mg) and glyoxal sol. 40% in water (0.1 mL) were added
and the mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 10 min. NH4Cl saturated solution
(0.5 mL) was added at this temperature and the resulting solution, in a 10-mL
sealed glass vial, was irradiated by microwave for 6 min at 120 °C. The mixture
was then cooled at 0 °C and NaOH was added until pH 12. The alkaline solution
was extracted with AcOEt two times. The combined organic layers were
washed with brine, dried (Na2SO4), filtered and evaporated to give the crude 4.
The crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel, using
AcOEt/MeOH 9:1 as eluant, and obtained as a tan oil.
References and notes
1. World Health Organization (WHO). Tuberculosis Fact sheet No. 104 - Global
and regional incidence. March 2006, Retrieved on 6 October 2006.
2. Raviglione, M. C.; O’Brien, R. J. Tuberculosis. In Harrison’s Principles of Internal
Medicine; Kasper, D. L., Braunwald, E., Fauci, A. S., Hauser, S. L., Longo, D. L.,
Jameson, J. L., Isselbacher, K. J., Eds., 16th ed.; McGraw-Hill Professional, 2004;
pp 953–966.
3. (a) Janin, Y. L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 2479; (b) Gutierrez-Lugo, M. T.;
Bewley, C. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 2606.
4. Cole, S. T.; Brosch, R.; Parkhill, J. Nature 1998, 393, 537.
18. Characterization of azole (R)-4e. Yield: 49%. 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 7.48–7.46 (3H,
m, NCHN and Ph), 7.39–7.38 (2H, m, Ph), 7.27–7.24 (3H,m, CCHNBn and Ph),
7.08 (1H, s, NCHCHN), 7.03–7.07 (2H, d, J = 8.21, Ph), 6.91(1H, s, NCHCHN), 6.59
(1H, s, CHN), 5.25 (2H, s, CH2Ph) ppm. 13C NMR (CDCl3): d 146.06, 136.76,
133.70,131.86, 129.48, 128.94, 128.94, 128.75, 128.53, 127.71, 122.51, 122.29,
56.62, 54.09 ppm. MS: 393.04 (M+), 395.04 (M+H)+ 416.04 (M+Na)+. ½a 2D0
ꢀ
+10.1
(c 1.0 CH2Cl2). Anal. Calcd for C19H16BrN5: C, 57.88; H, 4.09; N, 17.76. Found: C,
57.97; H, 4.32; N, 17.87.
5. Camus, J. C.; Pryor, M. J.; Medigue, C.; Cole, S. T. Microbiology 2002, 148, 2967.