Table 1 Enantioselective H2O2-sulfoxidations of aryl methyl sulfides
catalyzed by conjugates 1 and 2a
down to 0.2 mol% with a turnover number up to 395.
Structural modifications of both the flavin and cyclo-
dextrin components, which may bring about further improve-
ment in efficiencies (namely stability of the catalyst) and
enantioselectivities of the sulfoxidations as well as broad-
ening the substrate scope, are under investigation in our
laboratories.
Optimized conversion
Conv.
Catalystc 10 min (%)
Timed/min Conv. (%)
e
ee (%)
This work was financially supported by Czech Science
Foundation (Grant No. 203/07/1246) and IOCB (Z40550506).
Entry R
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
H
H
H
H
1
2
83
20
20
90
120
120
—
—
—
36
—
30
60
120
—
120
60
93
99
80
82
—
—
—
90
—
96
34
23
—
95
99
79
64
21
0
0
73
9
72
28
76
21
73
35
80
41
77
77
7 + b-CDf 17
Notes and references
8 + b-CDf 17
OH
OH
OCH3
OCH3
ORb
ORb
COOH 1
COOH 2
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
1
2
1
2
1
2
91
95
97
78
98
46
30
4
1 (a) I. Ferna
´
(b) M. C. Carreno, G. H. Herna
´
ndez and N. Khiar, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 3651;
ndez-Torres, M. Ribagorda and
A. Urbano, Chem. Commun., 2009, 6129; (c) J. Legras, J. R. Dehli
and C. Bolm, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2005, 347, 19.
2 (a) K. P. Bryliakov and E. P. Talsi, Curr. Org. Chem., 2008, 12, 386;
(b) H. B. Kagan, in Organosulfur Chemistry in Asymmetric Synthesis,
ed. T. Toru and C. Bolm, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2008, pp. 1–29.
3 Recent examples of metal catalyzed enantioselective sulfoxidations:
(a) Y. Wu, J. Liu, X. Li and A. S. C. Chan, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2009,
2607; (b) K. Matsumoto, T. Yamaguchi and T. Katsuki, Chem.
Commun., 2008, 1704; (c) T. Yamaguchi, K. Matsumoto, B. Saito
and T. Katsuki, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 4729;
(d) E. Kiromichi and T. Katsuki, Synlett, 2008, 1543.
1
2
97
18
1 (0.5%) 67
1 (0.2%) 35
60
a
Conditions: substrate (0.1 mmol), H2O2 (2.3 equiv.), phosphate
b
4 Organocatalytic systems for sulfoxidations are reviewed in: (a)
J.-E. Backvall, in Modern Oxidation Methods, ed. J.-E. Backvall,
buffer pH 7.5 (for 1) or 2.9 (for 2), RT. RQO(CH2)2O(CH2)2OCH3.
Catalyst loading 1 mol% (related to the substrate) if not stated
¨
¨
c
Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim, 2004, pp. 193–222; (b) A. Armstrong,
in Enantioselective Organocatalysis, ed. P. I. Dalko, Wiley-VCH
Verlag, Weinheim, 2007, pp. 403–424.
5 (a) F. G. Gelalcha, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 3338; (b) I. Yasushi and
N. Takeshi, Chem. Rec., 2007, 7, 354.
6 (a) S. Shinkai, T. Yamaguchi, O. Manabe and F. Toda, Chem.
d
otherwise. Time necessary to achieve at least 90% conversion,
e
maximally 120 min. Enantiomer ratios were determined by HPLC
f
on a chiral stationary phase (see ESIw). For structures of compounds
7 and 8, see Fig. 2.
Commun., 1988, 1399; (b) R. Jurok, R. Cibulka, H. Dvora
F. Hampl and J. Hodacova, Eur. J. Org. Chem, 2010, DOI:
10.1002/ejoc.201000592.
kova,
´ ´
´
7 S.-I. Murahashi, S. Ono and Y. Imada, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2002, 41, 2366.
8 R. Breslow and S. D. Dong, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 1997.
9 (a) L. G. Marinescu, M. Molbach, C. Rousseau and M. Bols,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 17578; (b) L. G. Marinescu and
M. Bols, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 4590.
10 K. Takahashi, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 2013.
Fig. 2 Structures of flavin catalysts 7 and 8.
11 (a) I. Tabushi and M. Kodera, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109, 4734;
(b) D. Rong, H. Ye, T. R. Boehlow and V. T. D’Souza, J. Org.
Chem., 1992, 57, 163; (c) H. P. Ye, W. Tong and V. T. D’Souza,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 5470; (d) H. Ye, W. Tong and
V. T. D’Souza, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1994, 2431;
(e) V. T. D’Souza, Supramol. Chem., 2003, 15, 221.
of methyl 4-methylphenyl sulfide (entry 15), quantitative
conversion was accomplished within 60 minutes of reaction
time. With 0.2 mol% loading of 1 79% conversion was
achieved within the same period (entry 16). Further increase
of reaction time produced no effect, indicating that the catalyst
was inactive after 1 hour of reaction time.
12 C. Smit, M. W. Fraaije and A. J. Minnaard, J. Org. Chem., 2008,
73, 9482.
13 The presence of reduced form of 1 could not be evidenced by MS
despite great efforts devoted to avoiding oxidation of the sample by
air oxygen. Higher sensitivity of dihydroalloxazine moiety towards
oxidation compared to dihydroisoalloxazine can be explained by
lower oxidation potential of the former; see ref. 14.
14 Y. Imada, H. Iida, S. Ono, Y. Masui and S.-I. Murahashi,
Chem.–Asian J., 2006, 1, 136.
15 The concentration of the catalysts 1 and 2 corresponds to
the concentration of the conjugates 5 and 6 prior to reductive
amination assuming quantitative conversion.
In conclusion, we have synthesized two b-cyclodextrin–
flavin conjugates, which proved to be highly efficient catalysts
for the oxidation of electron-rich methyl phenyl sulfides to
sulfoxides by hydrogen peroxide. In particular, the catalytic
system based on b-cyclodextrin–alloxazine conjugate 1 is
distinguished from other organocatalysts by fast near-
quantitative conversions and high enantioselectivities, reaching
up to 80% ee. It is also remarkable that the reactions proceed
in neat aqueous media with very low loadings of the catalyst
16 R. Cibulka, L. Baxova, H. Dvorakova, F. Hampl, P. Menova,
´ ´ ´ ´ ´
V. Mojr, B. Plancq and S. Sayin, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun.,
2009, 74, 973.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 7599–7601 7601