because of the high reactivity of BBr3 toward the terminal alkynes.
This observation led us to propose that the moderate stereoselec-
tivity for the reaction shown in Sequence 2 (Scheme 1) resulted
from a competitive reaction involving the facile formation of (Z)-
vinylboron dihalide (giving the Z-isomer after coupling with the
alkoxide). To minimize this undesired competitive reaction, we
felt that replacement of boron trihalide with Lewis acids that do
not undergo facile addition to alkynes might enhance the stereo-
selectivity of the overall coupling reaction. Previous studies from
our group,7 as well as other groups,8 have demonstrated that C-O
bond cleavage in alkoxide-type RC-OMXn (M ) Ti, Fe)
intermediates can occur smoothly at room temperature. In 2008,
Fuchter and Levy reported a one-pot method for the conversion
of carbonyl electrophiles to allylic chlorides by activating the in
to screen other metal halides. Fortunately, the desired reaction
occurred smoothly at room temperature using TiCl4; product
1a was isolated in 78% yield and with excellent stereose-
lectivity (E/Z ) 96:4).13 ZnCl2 and NiCl2 proved to be
ineffective. The product’s E stereochemistry was confirmed
by X-ray analysis of compound 1d.14
To evaluate the scope and limitations of the reaction, a
variety of benzylic, allylic, and propargylic alcohols were
prepared and subjected to the new reaction conditions (Table
1). Several examples illustrate that ether moieties, double
Table 1. Titanium(IV) Chloride Mediated Coupling of
Alkoxides with Alkynesa
9
situ generated magnesium alkoxides using TiCl4. Related work
by Murai and co-workers documented successful C-S bond
cleavage.10 Herein we report our preliminary results focused on
the stereoselective synthesis of trisubstituted (E)-alkenyl halides.
The reaction of lithium diphenylmethanoxide with phe-
nylacetylene was chosen as the model system (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. Lewis Acid Induced Coupling Reaction
Due to its low cost, FeCl3 was initially used to test the
feasibility of the coupling reaction.
Several solvents were surveyed but the poor solubility of
FeCl3 led to modest yield even after 24 h at room temper-
ature. Elevating the reaction temperature did increase the
yield but led to decreased stereoselectivity. These results are
consistent with a recent publication concerning the FeCl3
mediated coupling of benzyl alcohols and aryl alkynes in
refluxing CH2Cl2 which reports the formation of trisubstituted
(E)-alkenyl halides as the major products but with only
moderate stereoselectivities (E/Z ) ∼8:1).11 Notably, in 2008
Jana et al. reported that the FeCl3 mediated reaction in
nitromethane at 80 °C gives aryl ketones, rather than
trisubstituted (E)-alkenyl halides.12 Due to the poor solubility
of FeCl3 in organic solvents at room temperature, we decided
a Reaction was carried out at 0 °C for 10 min, then maintained at room
temperature (see experimental section for details). b E:Z ratio determined
by NMR. c Isolated yield based on alcohol. d E:Z stereoselectivity and yield
using BCl3 instead of TiCl4.
bonds, and triple bonds all tolerate the reaction conditions.
The E products are produced in excellent stereochemical
yields.15 Even lithium di(4-fluorobenzyl)methanoxide gives
excellent stereoselectivity (entry 5) using TiCl4. In our
previous work, this reaction afforded very poor stereoselec-
tivity (E/Z ) 60:40) when BCl3 was used.5 Successful
coupling using an aliphatic alkyne is notable, though the
stereoselectivity is rather poor (E/Z ) 70:30, entry 7). In
recent reports,11,12 it was noted that the FeCl3 mediated
coupling reaction of benzylic alcohols with alkynes is only
successful for aryl alkynes. The lower stereoselectivity
(E/Z) for aliphatic alkynes is most likely due to the lack of
steric bulk of the n-butyl group.
(5) Kabalka, G. W.; Yao, M.-L.; Borella, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 11320.
(6) Yao, M.-L.; Reddy, M. S.; Zeng, W.-b.; Hall, K.; Walfish, I.;
Kabalka, G. W. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 1385.
(7) (a) Kabalka, G. W.; Yao, M.-L.; Borella, S.; Goins, L. K. Organo-
metallics 2007, 26, 4112. (b) Kabalka, G. W.; Ju, Y.; Wu, Z. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 7915. (c) Kabalka, G. W.; Wu, Z.; Ju, Y. Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
3415.
(8) (a) Karunakar, G. V.; Periasamy, M. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7463.
(b) Falck, J. R.; Bejot, R.; Barma, D. K.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Joseph, S.;
Mioskowski, C. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 8178. (c) Miranda, P. O.; Diaz,
D. D.; Padron, J. I.; Ramirez, M. A.; Martin, V. S. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
57.
(9) Fuchter, M. J.; Levy, J.-N. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4919.
(10) (a) Murai, T.; Asai, F. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73 (2), 9518. (b) Murai,
T.; Asai, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 780.
2648
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 12, 2009