2688
E.G. Barbosa et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 44 (2009) 2685–2688
4.1.4. Synthesis of 1,2,3-trimethoxy-5-
[(4-methoxyphenyl)sulfonyl]benzene (3)
stabilizing buffer system [22] and 1.0
5.0
M [3H]colchicine (from Perkin–Elmer), compound at 1.0, 5.0,
or 50 M in a final dimethyl sulfoxide concentration of 5% (v/v). The
0.1 mL reaction mixtures were incubated for 10 min at 37 ꢀC, at
which time the reaction is about 40–50% complete in the absence of
compound. The reactions were stopped with 3 mL of ice water, and
each diluted reaction mixture was filtered through a stack of two
DEAE-cellulose filters from Whatman. The amount of radiolabeled
colchicine bound to the tubulin adsorbed to the filters was deter-
mined in a scintillation counter.
mM (0.1 mg/mL) tubulin,
m
To a solution of 30 mg (9.2 mmol) of compound 1 and 5 mL of
dichloromethane was added very slowly 2 equiv. of m-CPBA over 3
h. The reaction was monitored by thin-layer chromatography.
Purification was performed by flash chromatography, and an
amorphous powder was obtained (90% yield). M.p. ¼111–112 ꢀC. 1H
m
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3):
d
d 3.85 (s, 3H), d 3.86 (s, 3H), d 3.89 (s, 6H),
6.98 (d, J ¼ 9.04 Hz, 2H), 7.14 (s, 2H), 7.87 (d, J ¼ 9.04 Hz, 2H). 13
C
NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3),
d
55.62,
d
56.45,
d
60.89,
d
104.73,
d
114.5,
d
128.27,
d
129.6,
d
133.72,
d
136.84,
d
153.46, d 163.29. HRMS [ESI
(þ) – MS]: C16H18O6S [M þ H]þ m/z, calc. 339.0902, found 339.0993.
Acknowledgements
4.2. Antiproliferative and antitubulin activities
The authors owe a debt of gratitude to the following Brazilian
research agencies: FUNDECT-MS, CAPES, PROPP-UFMS, FINEP for
financial support and scholarships. We are also grateful to Kardol
MCF-7 human breast cancer cells were obtained from the
National Cancer Institute drug screening program. They were
grown in monolayer culture in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented
with 5% fetal bovine serum in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at
37 ꢀC. Compounds, dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide, were added at
varying concentrations, with a final dimethyl sulfoxide concentra-
tion of 1% (v/v). Compounds were added to cells that had been
seeded in 96-well plates 24 h earlier, and incubation continued for
48 h. Cells were fixed with 5% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid, and cell
protein was stained with sulforhodamine B [18]. The plates were
read in a Molecular Devices plate reader (Spectra Max 340). The
IC50 was the compound concentration that reduced the increase in
cell protein after 48 h by 50%.
´
´
Industria Quımica Ltda. (Brazil) for providing some reagents and,
LOE-UFC (Brazil) for carrying out the additional cytotoxic tests.
´
Euzebio thanks and dedicates this work to Nazinha.
References
[1] P.B. Schiff, J. Fant, S.B. Horwitz, Nature 277 (1979) 665–667.
[2] G.R. Pettit, S.B. Singh, E. Hamel, C.M. Lin, D.S. Alberts, D. Garcia-Kendall,
Experientia 45 (1989) 209–211.
[3] L. Vincent, P. Kermani, L.M. Young, J. Cheng, F. Zhang, K. Shido, G. Lam,
H. Bompais-Vincent, Z. Zhu, D.J. Hicklin, P. Bohlen, D.J. Chaplin, C. May,
S.J. Rafii, Clin. Invest. 115 (2005) 2992–3006.
Cytotoxicity assay in other cell lines: All compounds (0.0009–
5 mg/mL) were tested for cytotoxic activity against four additional
[4] G.C. Tron, T. Pirali, G. Sorba, F. Pagliai, S. Busacca, A.A. Genazzani, J. Med. Chem.
49 (2006) 3033–3044.
[5] G.R. Pettit, B. Toki, D.L. Herald, P. Verdier-Pinard, M.R. Boyd, E. Hamel,
R.K. Pettit, J. Med. Chem. 41 (1998) 1688–1695.
[6] N.J. Lawrence, D. Rennison, M. Woo, A.T. McGown, J.A. Hadfield, Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 11 (2001) 51–54.
[7] M. Cushman, D. Nagarathnam, D. Gopal, A.K. Chakraborti, C.M. Lin, E. Hamel,
J. Med. Chem. 34 (1991) 2579–2588.
[8] M. Cushman, D. Nagarathnam, D. Gopal, H.-H. He, C.M. Lin, E. Hamel, J. Med.
Chem. 35 (1992) 2293–2306.
human cell lines during 72 h of incubation: MDA/MB-435 (breast),
HCT-8 (colon), SF-295 (glyoblastoma) and HL-60 (leukemia). Tumor
cell growth was quantified by the ability of living cells to reduce the
yellow dye 3-(4,5-dymethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazo-
lium bromide (MTT) to a blue formazan product as described by
Mosmann [19].
The tubulin assembly and [3H]colchicine binding assays were
performed with electrophoretically homogenous bovine brain
[9] Z. Getahun, L. Jurd, P.S. Chu, C.M. Lin, E. Hamel, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 35 (1992)
1058–1067.
[10] C.G. Bates, R.K. Gujadhur, D. Venkataraman, Org. Lett. 4 (2002) 2803–2806.
[11] E.L. Clennan, X. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111 (1989) 5787–5792.
[12] J.G. Sime, D.J. Woodhouse, J. Cryst. Mol. Struct. 4 (1974) 269–285.
[13] S.C. Abrahams, Acta Crystalollogr. 10 (1957) 417–422.
[14] V.R. Vangala, R. Mondal, C.K. Broder, J.A.K. Howard, G.R. Desiraju, Cryst.
Growth Des. 5 (2005) 99–104.
[15] G.R. Pettit, S.B. Singh, M.L. Niven, E. Hamel, J. Schmidt, J. Nat. Prod. 50 (1987)
119–131.
[16] D.D. Perrin, W.L.F. Armarego (Eds.), Purification of Laboratory Chemicals,
Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1988.
[17] R.G.R. Bacon, J.R. Wright, J. Chem. Soc. C (1969) 1978–1981.
[18] A. Monks, D. Scudiero, P. Skehan, R. Shoemaker, K. Paull, D. Vistica, C. Hose,
J. Langley, P. Cronise, A. Vaigro-Wolff, M. Gray-Goodrich, H. Campbell, J. Mayo,
M. Boyd, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 83 (1991) 757–766.
[19] T. Mosmann, J. Immunol. Methods 65 (1983) 55–63.
[20] E. Hamel, C.M. Lin, Biochemistry 23 (1984) 4173–4184.
[21] E. Hamel, Cell Biochem. Biophys. 38 (2003) 1–21.
[22] P. Verdier-Pinard, J.-Y. Lai, H.-D. Yoo, J. Yu, B. Marquez, D.G. Nagle, M. Nambu,
J.D. White, J.R. Falck, W.H. Gerwick, B.W. Day, E. Hamel, Mol. Pharmacol. 53
(1998) 62–76.
tubulin [20]. The assembly assay [21] was performed with 10 mM
(1.0 mg/mL) tubulin in 0.8 M monosodium glutamate (pH 6.6 with
HCl in a 2.0 M stock solution), 0.4 mM GTP, and 4% (v/v) dimethyl
sulfoxide (as compound solvent). Tubulin and varying compound
concentrations were preincubated without GTP for 15 min at 30 ꢀC,
samples were placed on ice, and GTP was added. The samples were
transferred to 0 ꢀC cuvettes in Beckman DU7400 and DU7500
recording spectrophotometers equipped with electronic tempera-
ture controllers. After baselines were established at 350 nm, the
temperature was jumped to 30 ꢀC (less than 1 min), and sample
turbidity was followed for 20 min. The IC50 was the compound
concentration that reduced the turbidity reading at 20 min by 50%
relative to a control reaction mixture without compound.
The colchicine binding assay was described in detail by Verdier-
Pinard et al. [22]. The reaction mixtures contained a tubulin