competitive carbocyclization when the reaction is conducted
in a mixture of CH2Cl2 and methanol (Scheme 1). The major
Table 1. Phenylseleniranium Ion-Induced Friedel-Crafts
Cyclizations
product(s)/yield
(%)
reaction conditionsa
Scheme 1. Seleniranium-Ion Initiated Friedel-Crafts Reaction
entry
1
2
3
5a
7a
-90 °C, 2 h, -80 °C, 8 h
-78 °C, 2 h
AgBF4 (3.1 equiv) -90 °C,
2 h, -80 °C, 8 h
AgOTf (3.1 equiv) -90 °C,
2 h, -80 °C, 8 h
-100 °C, 2 h, -80 °C, 8 h
-90 °C, 2 h, -80 °C, 8 h
-90 °C, 2 h, -80 °C,
8 h (no MeOH quench)
-78 °C, 2 h, rt, 8 h
6a (85)
6a (7)
6a (75)
4
6a (61)
5
6
7
8a (55), 9a (30)
8a (48), 9a (15)
8a + 9a (30%)
8
9
8a + 9a (<5%)
8a + 9a (<5%)
PhSeCl, AgSbF6 (3.1 equiv)
-90 °C, 2 h, -80 °C, 8 h
side product, the ꢀ-methoxyselenide 4, is readily converted
into the cyclic product 3 by protic or Lewis acids. Formation
of the methoxylated product 4 cannot be avoided since in
the absence of methanol the reaction gave poor yields. Yet
another limitation of this potentially powerful Friedel-Crafts
cyclization is that nonactivated arenes (e.g., phenyl) do not
participate in this reaction.3j,4,5a
While searching for a general route to 1-methylenetetralin
and analogous heterocyclic compounds in connection with
our asymmetric hydrovinylation approach to 2,3-pyrrolidi-
noindoles (Figure 1), we decided to revisit this area. We
10
11
12
13
14
15
NaBARF 1.2 (equiv), -90 °C, 2 h 8a (38), 9a (15)
-78 °C, 2 h 6b (97)
AgSbF6 (1.05 equiv), -78 °C, 2 h 6b (50)
5b
10a -90 °C, 1 h, -70 °C, 8 h
10b -90 °C, 1 h, -80 °C, 8 h
11a (80)
11b (52)
13 (74)
12
-90 °C, 2 h, -80 °C, 8 h
a See the text and Supporting Information for details. Reactions
performed in CH2Cl2 in the presence of 1.01 equiv of PhSeBr and 3.1 equiv
of AgSbF6 unless otherwise mentioned. At the end of the reaction, excess
MeOH was added and the mixture stirred for 1 h before workup.
Our studies (eqs 1 and 2; Table 1) started with cyclizations
of two prototypical substrates, but-3-enyl 4-methoxyphenyl
ether (5a) and N-phenyl-N-(but-3-enyl)-4-toluenesulfonamide
(7a). A number of studies in the literature have suggested
that counterions and additives in the reaction medium
significantly affect the reactivity and selectivity of the
reactions of seleniranium ions.7 For example, in a study that
is highly pertinent to the present work, it has been reported
that PhSeCl in the presence of a silver salt does not effect
the cyclization of 4-aryl-1-butenes,5a even though such
reactions are known to proceed in moderate yields using
combination of N-(phenylseleno)succinimide and Lewis
acids3j as long as the arene is activated and electron-rich.
We decided to explore the effect of alternate counterions
and reaction conditions on the cyclizations. Initial scouting
experiments to identify the optimal reaction conditions
revealed that the best yields are obtained when a combination
of PhSeBr and a silver salt in anhydrous CH2Cl2 is employed.
Thus, the but-3-enyl aryl ether 5a gave the expected product
6a in 85% isolated yield when the reaction was initiated at
-90 °C and then stirred for 8 h at -80 °C (entry 1, Table
1). Generation of the seleniranium ion and its subsequent
reaction at low temperature are critical for success of this
reaction. Entry 2 shows a reaction that was allowed to
proceed only for a shorter period, resulting in a much lower
yield. Entry 8 is a related example using the substrate 7a.
Presumably, alternate modes of reactivity of the seleniranium
ions have higher energies of activation and they are not
competent at low temperatues where the slow cyclization
ensues. Under the optimized reaction conditions, 3.1 equiv
of the silver salt is used. Highly reproducible results were
Figure 1. Alkene precursors for 2,3-pyrrolidinoindoles.
expected the alkene-forming elimination reaction to be more
facile via a selenide as compared to an iodide5 or sulfide6
arising from alternate cyclizations, especially for the synthesis
of the more sensitive N- and O-containing heterocycles.
Several novel observations that were made during the course
of these investigations form the basis of this paper.
(3) (a) Clive, D. L. J.; Chittatu, G.; Wong, C. K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1978, 441. (b) Kametani, T.; Suzuki, K.; Kurobe, H.; Nemoto,
H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1979, 1128. (c) Nicolaou, K. C.;
Claremon, D. A.; Barnette, W. E.; Seitz, S. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979,
101, 3704. (d) Jackson, W. P.; Ley, S. V.; Whittle, A. J. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1980, 1173. (e) Alderdice, M.; Weiler, L. Can. J. Chem.
1981, 59, 2239. (f) Jackson, W. P.; Ley, S. V.; Morton, J. A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1981, 22, 2601. (g) Kametani, T.; Suzuki, K.; Kurobe, H.; Nemoto,
H. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1981, 29, 105. (h) Ley, S. V.; Lygo, B.; Molines,
H.; Morton, J. A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1982, 1251. (i) Toshimitsu,
A.; Uemura, S.; Okano, M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1982, 87. (j)
Edstrom, E. D.; Livinghouse, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 3483.
(4) De´ziel, R.; Malenfant, E.; Thibault, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
5493.
(5) (a) Appelbe, R.; Casey, M.; Dunne, A.; Pascarella, E. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2003, 44, 7641. (b) Barluenga, J.; Trincado, M.; Rubio, E.; Gonza´lez,
J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3416.
(6) Edstrom, E. D.; Livinghouse, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 1334.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 13, 2009
2925