Conclusions
The results suggest that the mechanism of generation of a
cathodic photocurrent from the dyeÈITO electrode involves
the formation of excited-state tautomerism. This state accepts
an electron from the conductive band of the ITO electrode
and, meanwhile, transfers an electron to the electrolyte solu-
tion through the LB Ðlm. The mechanism is supported by
studying the e†ect of bias voltage, the addition of donors and
acceptors, and pH, on the photocurrent generation. The
quantum yield is 0.58% under favourable conditions.
Scheme 3 Schematic diagram showing electron transfer processes.
Arrows indicate the electron Ñow. (a) and (b) cathodic photocurrent,
(Dye-H`) represents the state of dye 1 which combines with H` ions
in acidic medium, (c) anodic photocurrent.
This project is Ðnancially supported by a National Funda-
mental Research Key Project of China and the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 29671001)
tron acceptor and thus assists generation of a cathodic photo-
current. This mechanism is also supported by the spectrum
change in an acidic medium. C and D have a resonance struc-
ture which accepts electrons to become E.
References
The direction of the photocurrent generation is shown in
Scheme 3. We can see that it depends not only on the dye
sensitized by light, but also on the nature of the redox couple
in the aqueous phase surrounding the electrode. In the pres-
ence of redox couples favouring electron donation an anodic
photocurrent is generated, while with electron acceptors in the
aqueous phase a cathodic photocurrent is produced.
In order to examine the mechanism of light sensitization for
the production of cathodic and anodic photocurrents, the
energies of the relevant electronic states must be estimated.
1
2
K. Y. Law, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 449.
G. J. Ashwell, G. Je†eries, D. G. Hamilton, D. E. Lynch, M. P. S.
Roberts, G. S. Bahra and C. R. Brown, Nature (L ondon), 1995,
375, 385.
3
W. S. Xia, C. H. Huang, L. B. Gan and H. Li, J. Chem. Soc.,
Faraday T rans., 1996, 92, 3131.
W. S. Xia, C. H. Huang and D. J. Zhou, L angmuir, 1997, 13, 80.
W. S. Xia, C. H. Huang, X. Z. Ye, C. P. Luo, L. B. Gan and Z. F.
Liu, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 2244.
W. S. Xia, C. H. Huang, L. B. Gan, H. Li and X. S. Zhao, J.
Chem. Soc., Faraday T rans., 1996, 92, 769.
Organic Materials for Nonlinear Optics III ed. G. J. Ashwell and
D. Bloor, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1993.
P. N. Prasad and D. J. Williams, Introduction to Nonlinear
Optical E†ects in Molecules and Polymers, Wiley, New York,
1991.
4
5
6
7
8
From the electron affinity the conduction band (E ) and
c
valence band (E ) edges of the ITO electrode surface are esti-
v
mated to be ca. [4.5 and [8.3 eV,16 respectively. The energy
levels of the dye are assumed to be [5.54 eV (0.80 V vs. SCE)
and [2.78 eV on the absolute scale, respectively, with refer-
ence to an oxidation potential of 0.80 V vs. SCE and a band
gap of 2.76 eV (450 nm). The reduction potential of the dye in
an acidic medium is [4.52 eV ([0.22 V vs. SCE), the re-
duction potential of MV2` is [4.51 eV ([0.23 V vs. SCE),17
9
S. Nespurek, Int. J. Electron., 1994, 76, 777.
10 S. Allen, in Molecular Electronics, ed. G. J. Ashwell, Research
Studies, Taunton, 1992, pp. 207È265.
11 C. Bubeck, A. Laschewsky, D. Lupo, D. Neher, P. Ottenbreit, W.
Paulus, W. Prass, H. Ringsdorf and G. Wegner, Adv. Mater.,
1991, 3, 54.
12 A. Haraguchi, Y. Yonezawa and R. Hanawa, Photochem. Photo-
biol., 1990, 52, 307.
the oxidation potential of H Q is [4.61 eV ([0.13 V vs.
2
SCE)17 on the absolute scale.
The cathodic photocurrent probably involves electron
transfer from the excited dye aggregate to the electron accep-
tor, with a subsequent electron transfer from the conduction
band of the ITO electrode to the hole residing in the dye
aggregate17 in the presence of some electron acceptors, such
13 Y. Li and S. Dong, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1993, 348, 181.
14 (a) H. Hada and Y. Yonezawa, Synth. Met., 1987, 18, 791; (b) H.
Hada, Y. Yonezawa and H. Inaba, Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem.,
1981, 85, 425.
15 (a) N. S. Bayliss and E. G. Mcrae, J. Phys. Chem., 1954, 58, 1002;
(b) G. J. Brealey and M. Kasha, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1955, 77,
4462.
16 L. Sereno, J. J. Silber, L. Otero, M. D. V. Bohorquez, A. L.
Moore, T. A. Moore and D. Gust., J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 814.
17 Y. S. Kim, K. Liang, K. Y. Law and D. G. Whitten, J. Phys.
Chem., 1994, 98, 984.
as O , MV2` and in an acidic medium.
2
Anodic photocurrent generation may occur when an elec-
tron donor injects an electron into the hole of the ground-
state dye aggregate with subsequent electron transfer from the
excited dye aggregate to the conduction band of the ITO elec-
trode,17 in the presence of some electron donors, such as H Q,
2
K [Fe(CN) ] and in an alkaline medium.
Paper 7/08450A; Received 24th November, 1997
4
6
J. Chem. Soc., Faraday T rans., 1998, V ol. 94
1415