5460
N. Ototake et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 5458–5460
3. Typical examples of separable amide rotamers: (a) Mannschreck, A.
O
R
Tetrahedron Lett. 1965, 1341; (b) Staab, H. A.; Lauer, D. Tetrahedron Lett.
1966, 4593; (c) Schlecker, R.; Seebach, D.; Lubosch, W. Helv. Chim. Acta 1978,
61, 512; (d) Seebach, D.; Wykypiel, W.; Lubosch, W.; Kalinowski, H. O. Helv.
Chim. Acta 1978, 61, 3100.
"steric
repulsion"
R
N
O
-Bu
N
Δ
t-Bu
t
-Bu
t
-Bu
t
(toluene, 100 ºC
10 - 30 h)
4. Our papers on atropisomeric ortho-mono-tert-butylanilides: (a) Kitagawa, O.;
Izawa, H.; Sato, K.; Dobashi, A.; Taguchi, T.; Shiro, M. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
2634; (b) Kitagawa, O.; Takahashi, M.; Yoshikawa, M.; Taguchi, T. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 3676; (c) Kitagawa, O.; Yoshikawa, M.; Tanabe, H.; Morita, T.;
Takahashi, M.; Dobashi, Y.; Taguchi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12923.
5. Zyryanov, G. V.; Hampe, E. M.; Rudkevich, D. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
3854.
"steric
repulsion"
t
-Bu
"n-π repulsion"
Z-2 (minor)
t
-Bu
E-2 (major)
2a (R = Et, E/Z =6), 2b (R = Me, E/Z = 10), 2c (R = Me2CH, E/Z= 1.4),
2d (R = cyclohexyl, E/Z = 1.4), 2e (R = CO2Me, E/Z = 4),
2f (R = p-Br-C6H4, E/Z = 3), 2g (R = MeCH=CH, E/Z = 5)
6. (a) Tsuji, J. J. Syn. Org. Chem. Jpn. 1999, 57, 1036; (b) Trost, B. M. Acc. Chem. Res.
1980, 13, 385.
7. The allylation of ortho-mono-tert-butylanilide using
a p-allyl-Pd catalyst
directly gave N-allylated product without the formation of an O-allylation
product: (a) Kitagawa, O.; Kohriyama, M.; Taguchi, T. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
67, 8682; (b) Terauchi, J.; Curran, D. P. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14,
587.
Figure 2. Thermal isomerization between E-2 and Z-2.
8. It is obvious that the present O,N-allylic rearrangement does not proceed via
rt. Meanwhile, 2a–g of Z-major changed to equilibrium mixture of
E-major when heated for 10–30 h at 100 °C in toluene (Fig. 2). The
equilibrium ratio (E/Z = 1.4–10) considerably depended on substi-
tuent R. The E-rotamer preference of 2 may be explained on the ba-
aza-Claisen reaction, but via reproduction of
p-allyl-Pd complex, because the
reaction through aza-Claisen mechanism should give E-rotamer. Typical papers
on Pd-catalyzed conversions from O-allyl imidates to N-allyl amides: (a)
Overman, L. E. Acc. Chem. Res 1980, 13, 218; (b) Ikariya, T.; Ishikawa, Y.; Hirai,
K.; Yoshikawa, S. Chem. Lett. 1982, 1815; (c) Schenck, T. G.; Bosnich, B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 2058; (d) Calter, M.; Hollis, T. K.; Overman, L. E.; Ziller, J.;
Zipp, C. G. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 1449.
sis of n–p repulsion between the lone pairs on the carbonyl oxygen
and aromatic ring, and steric repulsion between R and allyl group
(Fig. 2).12 Namely, the destabilization of the Z-rotamer due to both
9. General procedure for N-allylation of 2,4,6-tri-tert-butyl-NH-anilide 1. Under an
Ar atmosphere, to 1b (752 mg, 2.48 mmol) in DMF (10 mL) was added NaH
(228 mg, 5.7 mmol, 60% assay). After being stirred for 5 min at rt, the
suspension of (allyl-Pd-Cl)2 (19.8 mg, 0.054 mmol), dppf (68.7 mg,
0.124 mmol), and allyl acetate (0.4 mL, 3.72 mmol) in DMF (3.0 mL) was
added to the mixture, and then the reaction mixture was stirred for 15 h at rt.
The mixture was poured into 2% HCl solution and extracted with AcOEt. The
AcOEt extracts were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and evaporated to
dryness. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/
AcOEt = 12) gave the mixture of Z-2b and E-2b (787 mg, 92%, E/Z = 3.2). Z-2b
(more polar) and E-2b (less polar) were separated by MPLC (hexane/AcOEt = 7).
the n–p repulsion and the steric repulsion may bring about the E-
rotamer preference.4c,12,13 In the cases of 1c and 1d having bulky
substituent R, the decrease in the E/Z ratio of 2 should be observed
because of strong steric repulsion between R and the tert-butyl-
phenyl group in E-2 (E/Z = 1.4).
In conclusion, we succeeded in the development of stereoselec-
tive synthetic method of separable amide rotamer through N-ally-
lation using p-allyl-Pd catalyst. This result should be noted as very
Z-2b: mp 141–143 °C; IR (KBr) 1649 cmꢀ1 1H NMR (CDCl3) d: 7.39 (2H, s), 5.41
;
(1H, tdd, J = 6.7, 10.2, 17.0 Hz), 5.16 (1H, qd, J = 1.3, 17.0 Hz), 5.02 (1H, qd,
J = 1.3, 10.2 Hz), 4.23 (2H, td, J = 1.3, 6.7 Hz), 2.11 (3H, s), 1.37 (18H, s), 1.28 (9H,
s);13C NMR (CDCl3) d: 172.9, 148.3, 146.4, 132.1, 131.7, 125.4, 118.5, 56.2, 37.3,
34.6, 33.1, 31.3, 23.7; MS (m/z) 344 (MH+). Anal. Calcd for C23H37NO: C, 80.41;
H, 10.86; N, 4.08. Found: C, 80.33; H, 10.58; N, 3.96. E-2b: mp 70–73 °C; IR
few examples of kinetically controlled stereoselective synthesis of
separable amide rotamers.3c,d,14 Furthermore, the interesting
mechanism of the present N-allylation, which proceeds via O-ally-
lation and subsequent O,N-allylic rearrangement, and the thermo-
dynamic stabilities of the various prepared amide rotamers were
clarified. Rotamers based on an amide C(O)–N bond play an impor-
tant role in the regulation of the actions in biologically active pep-
tides and functional molecules having amide skeletons.15 Thus, the
present work should provide broad interest from the viewpoint of
structural organic chemistry as well as unique stereoselective reac-
(KBr) 1655 cmꢀ1 1H NMR (CDCl3) d: 7.42 (2H, s), 5.38 (1H, tdd, J = 6.8, 10.2,
;
17.1 Hz), 5.19 (1H, qd, J = 1.5, 17.1 Hz), 5.01 (1H, qd, J = 1.5, 10.2 Hz), 4.27 (2H,
br d, J = 6.8 Hz), 1.85 (3H, s), 1.34 (18H, s), 1.31 (9H, s);13C NMR (CDCl3) d:
171.7, 149.4, 146.7, 132.9, 132.1, 125.9, 118.8, 53.5, 37.6, 34.7, 33.4, 31.3, 24.4;
MS (m/z) 344 (MH+). Anal. Calcd for C23H37NO: C, 80.41; H, 10.86; N, 4.08.
Found: C, 80.34; H, 10.75; N, 3.98.
10. Unfortunately, under the same conditions, the reaction with 2,4,6-tri-tert-
butylchloroacetanilide gave a complex mixture.
11. The stereochemistries of 2a and 2e were determined by NOESY experiment. In
tion (rotamer-selective reaction) and p-allyl-Pd chemistry.
Z-2a and Z-2e, strong NOE between allylic hydrogen and
ester Me group (2e) was observed. Stereochemistries of 2b–d, 2f, and 2g were
determined on the basis of chemical shifts of -hydrogens or ortho-hydrogens
in 1H NMR. That is,
-hydrogens and ortho-hydrogens of E-rotamers appeared
a-hydrogen (2a) or
a
Supplementary data
a
in higher field than those of Z-rotamers because of an anisotropy effect by the
tert-butylphenyl group having large twist angle.3
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
12. Typical papers on the E-rotamer preference of N-alkylated anilide derivatives:
(a) Pederson, B. F.; Pederson, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1956, 2995; (b) Itai, A.;
Toriumi, Y.; Tomioka, N.; Kagechika, H.; Azumaya, I.; Shudo, K. Tetrahedron Lett.
1989, 30, 6177; (c) Curran, D. P.; Hale, G. R.; Geib, S. J.; Balog, A.; Cass, Q. B.;
Degani, A. L. G.; Hernandes, M. Z.; Freitas, L. C. G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997,
8, 3955; (d) Azumaya, I.; Yamaguchi, K.; Okamoto, I.; Kagechika, H.; Shudo, K. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9083.
References and notes
1. Typical papers on atropisomeric ortho-mono-tert-butylanilides: (a) Kawamoto,
T.; Tomishima, M.; Yoneda, F.; Hayami, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 3169; (b)
Curran, D. P.; Qi, H.; Geib, S. J.; DeMello, N. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3131;
(c) Kishikawa, K.; Tsuru, I.; Kohomoto, S.; Yamamoto, M.; Yamada, K. Chem. Lett.
1994, 1605; (d) Clayden, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 949; (e) Hughes, A.
D.; Price, D. A.; Simpkins, N. S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 1295; (f) Bach,
T.; Schröder, J.; Harms, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 9003; (g) Kondo, K.; Iida,
T.; Fujita, H.; Suzuki, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Murakami, Y. Tetrahedron 2000, 56,
8883; (h) Dantale, S.; Reboul, V.; Metzner, P.; Philouze, C. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8,
632; (i) Tetrahedron Symposium-in-print on Atropisomerism, Clayden, J. Ed.,
Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 4325.
13. E-Rotamer preference of N-methylanilides has been rationalized on the basis of
such n–p interaction: Saito, S.; Toriumi, Y.; Tomioka, N.; Itai, A. J. Org. Chem.
1995, 60, 4715. See also Ref. 4c.
14. (a) Beak, P.; Zajdel, W. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 1010; (b) Hay, D. R.; Song,
Z.; Smith, S. G.; Beak, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 8145; (c) Yokokawa, F.;
Sameshima, H.; Shioiri, T. Synlett 2001, 986; (d) Deng, S.; Taunton, J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 916.
15. (a) Tanatani, A.; Azumaya, I.; Kagechika, H. J. Syn. Org. Chem. Jpn. 2000, 58, 556;
(b) Chen, R. P.; Gellman, S. H.; DeGrado, W. F. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3219; (c)
Hill, D. J.; Mio, M. J.; Prince, R. B.; Hughes, T. S.; Moore, J. S. Chem. Rev. 2001,
101, 3893.
2. (a) Chupp, J. P.; Olin, J. F. J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32, 2297; (b) Molin, W. T.; Porter, C.
A.; Chupp, J. P.; Naylor, K. Pest. Biochem. Phys. 1990, 36, 277.